1- Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran 2- Department of Occupational Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran 3- Department of Statistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Abstract: (10227 Views)
Background and Aim: One of the chemical pollutions which is frequently common in industry-other than noise is carbon monoxide. The present study aimed to assess the putative protective effect of N-acetylcysteine on the function of outer hair cells of rabbits exposed simultaneously to noise and carbon monoxide. Methods: 24 male rabbits are entered in this interventional study. After obtaining baseline distortion product otoacoustic emissions, rabits were randomely devided into four groups. The groups Included: exposed with noise and received saline, exposed with noise and carbon monoxide and received saline, exposed with noise and received N-acetylcysteine, and exposed with noise and carbon monoxide and received N-acetylcysteine. Subsequently, they were evaluated again with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two stages (two hours and one week after the exposure). Data were recorded and analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: Exposure to noise, and also simultaneous exposure to noise and carbon monoxide, and moreover using N-acetylcysteine in both groups, produced significant changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitudes (p<0.005). Conclusion: The findings of the present research reveal that simultaneous exposure to noise and carbon monoxide may potentiate noise induced hearing loss. In addition, utilizing N-acetylcysteine can be used as a preventive agent for noise induced hearing loss and to avoid its potentiation with carbon monoxide.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.