|
|
|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Auditory Brain Stem Response
Abdollah Mousavi, Bahram Jalaei, Volume 5, Issue 1 (5-1998)
Abstract
Masking is a necessary part in ABR test the same as other Audiological experiments to obtain the real responses without the intrusion of the other ear. In the current research we are aimed at studying the effect of the masking noise on the pure latency of wave V and interwave latencies of I-III, III-V and I-V. Noise was delivered to the non test ear with intensities of 0, 30, 50 and 70 dB in four different sessions while the intensity level of the stimulus was fixed in all four sessions.
Mahin Sedaie, Volume 7, Issue 1 (5-1999)
Abstract
Many pregnant women are exposed to noise in the workplace. Noise can affect both fetus and pregnancy of pregnant women. Hormonal disturbances and nanism are of devastating effects of noise. An increased risk of shortened gestation has been shown in four studies Results. In a third study showed the length of gestation in female infants to be inversely correlated to maternal residential noise exposure. Decreased birth weight has also been associated with noise exposure in pregnant women.Some of the adverse impacts of exposure to noise is discussed here as an investigation report.
Naser Akbarlou, Dr.mohammad Farhadi, Dr. Ahmad Daneshi, Dr. Gholamreza Olyaei, Dr. Soqrat Faghihzadeh, Volume 9, Issue 1 (5-2001)
Abstract
Methods and Materials: Investigation of electrically evoked auditory brain stem response (EABR) is a new issue, especially in implanted patients. Experiments were performed in C.I Center of Iranian Institute for Science and research expansion,1996 on 30 implanted patients with 22 spectra and MSP cochlear implant system and 30 normal subjects with the range of 3-33 years.Findings:1- EABR was obtained in the implanted patients.2- Absolute latency of EABR waves is 1-1.5 ms shorter than ABR waves ‘P<0.05).3-Absolute latency of wave V decreases as a function of electric stimulus magnitude (P<0.05).4- No significant difference was observed in IPL Ill-V between ABR and EABR.
|
|
|
|
|
| This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
|
|
|
|