|
|
|
|
Search published articles |
|
|
Showing 4 results for Musician
Mina Milani, Volume 7, Issue 1 (5-1999)
Abstract
Sound is an inseparable part of human life and provides us with lovely experiences such as listening to music. Musicians from classical orchestras to rock groups are exposed to high decibel of sounds. Musicians playing percussion musical instruments are exposed to high level of impact noise and players of Brass musical instruments are highly exposed to noise peaks higher than 100dB. Woodwind players are enduring the risk of posing directly in front of Brass players. Based on the above-mentioned risks for hearing loss clinical consideration of noise induced hearing loss in musicians is highly required.In the current study we were aimed at examining hearing stratus of classic and traditional musicians by means of pure tone audiometry in Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. 33 subjects were evaluated aged between 22 to 59 years old. Their musical experience was variable between 6 to 45 years.The study demonstrated that most of the musicians in this study suffered bilateral high frequency hearing loss with a notch in the frequency range of 4-8 KHz.
Parisa Mirhaj, Ghassem Mohammadkhani, Mahin Sedaie, Mansoureh Adel Gharaman, Soghrat Faghihzadeh, Volume 14, Issue 1 (9-2005)
Abstract
Objective: determining difference limen for Frequency (DLF)in string musicians. Materials &Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 15 string musicians with musicianship > 10 years (30 ears) and 15 normal hearing subjects (30 ears). They all were male and 20-30 years old. DLF was measured after otoscopy and immitance audiometry and pure tone audiometry. Results: DLF was significantly different between two groups of case and control. DLF in musicians is less than the normal hearing subjects. Conclusion: It seems that familiarization with notes results in better DLF in musicians comparing to others.
Parisa Mirhaj, Ghasem Mohammad Khani, Mahin Sedaie, Soghrat Faghihzadeh, Volume 14, Issue 2 (2-2006)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Hearing sensitivity is so vital for musicians as loud music can cause hearing loss. The aim of this study was to assess hearing sensitivity of musicians in order to determine the effects of music exposure on hearing organ. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 15 string musicians with musicianship history of more than 10 years and 15 normal hearing subjects. They all were male and 20-30 years old. TEOAEs and DPOAEs performed after otoscopy , immittance and pure tone audiometry in octave frequencies between 250 to 16000 Hz. Results: There is not significant difference between pure tone thresholds of two groups for all frequencies.A significant difference of TEOAE is found between two groups for total response and amplituds of TEOAEs . DPOAEs amplituds are not significantly different between two groups . Conclusion: Musicianship may affect TEOAEs amplitudes , but cannot affect results of PTA and DPOAEs. Therefore this can be useful to detect cochlear lesions secondary to music exposure and also as a tool in hearing protection program.
Ghassem Mohamadkhani, Mohammad Hossein Nilforoushkhoshk, Ali Zadeh Mohammadi, Soghrat Faghihzadeh, Mahsa Sepehrnejhad, Volume 19, Issue 2 (6-2010)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Main feature of auditory processing abilities is temporal processing including temporal resolution, temporal ordering, temporal integration and temporal masking. Many studies have shown the superiority of musicians in temporal discrimination over non-musicians. In this study we compared temporal processing in musicians and non-musician controls via Gap in Noise (GIN) test. Methods: This cohort study was conducted on 24 musicians with mean age of 25.3 years and 24 normal hearing non-musician controls with mean age of 24.5 years, in Faculty of Rehabilitation of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. GIN test results (approximate threshold and percent of corrected answers) obtained and analyzed by Mann-Whitney non-parametric statistical test. Results: There was significant difference between approximate threshold and percent of corrected answers between musicians and non-musician group (p<0.001), while no sex difference was observed between both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: the lower approximate threshold and the more corrected answers in GIN test by musician group indicate rapid auditory temporal processing ability of this group rather than non-musicians group. This might be related to effects of musical training on central auditory processing.
|
|
|
|
| This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
|
|
|