Hearing function can affect communication skills and especially speech and language abilities.As a result, most of the attempts in behavioral audiometry have focused on the improvement and rectification of the techniques for hearing evaluations of the infants and children.Crib-O-gram and the methods suggested by northern & Downs are some of the mentined protocoles.

For years a significant advance for evaluating hearing sensitivity of children have been taken place. say, behavoral visual audiometry, VRA, TROCA and play audiometry. some studies also have been performed regarding to the use of BOA technique in mental retarded children and its success in evaluating hearing sensitivity in such children.other protocoles use rewarding thechniques for reinforcing child's responses which have been demonstrated to be success in the evaluation.

In addition,by comparying the results of frequency and intensity discrimination (by means of Luescher test), the changes in the resonance frequency of the outer ear and loudness conmfortable level(LDL), one can study the process of hearing development in children.

Background: hearing loss is a major health care problem that tends to retard the developmental milestones of children. It takes early detection and intervention to avoid a permanent loss in acquisition of speech and cognitive functions. Hence, the importance of hearing screening in all children especially in the developing world for accurate statistics and early intervention is clear. This work was aimed at predicting hearing in children by means of acoustic reflex measurements
Method: In this study which was performed in 1995, 146 ears(86 children aged between 5-10years old referring to audio logy clinic in Tehran university of medical sciences between august 1995 and February 1996) were evaluated (amongst 95 were normal and 51 ears with SNHL<84dB).the methods Niemeyer and Destrehan formula ,Lilly2 equation, un weighed Sensitivity prediction by acoustic reflex, weighed sensitivity prediction by acoustic reflex to establish their clinical viability.
Results: findings demonstrated that weighed sensitivity prediction by acoustic reflex(WASPAR) have a good correlation with conventional audiometric evaluation(K=.78) and also it has good sensitivity, Specificity , Negative predicted value(NPA) and positive predicted value (PPV).
Conclusion: In case that conventional audiometry is not applicable, WASPAR is a good objective choice in lieu of subjective tests.

Materials and Methods: It is for the first time in Iran that designing and construction of phase-shifter instrument for performing Masking Level Difference have been studied. For reducing limitations of MLD test in middle ear pathologies, new methods of performing MLD has been considered.
In this method noise is conducted by bone vibrator, located on forehead. The comparison between standard method and proposed method has been obtained.Forty 20-25 year-old men referring to the Faculty of Rehabilitation Science in Iran university of Medical Sciences have been tested in the period of time between 10.30.1998 to 12.21.1998.The MLD test was performed in both method at frequencies of 250, 500, 1000, 2000 & 4000 Hz.
Results: The mean of MLD results n the standard method was 11.175 dB ranging from 10 to 13 dB that is in accordance with normative data.
- There was no significant difference between the means obtained in the methods for performing MLD.
- In both methods the MLD means decreased with frequency increments.
Conclusion: It is preferable to use proposal method in middle ear disorders due to normal cochlear sensitivity and subsequently enough noise that is conducted by bone conduction (60 dB SPL).

Background and Aim: Rapid automized naming test is an appropriate tool to diagnose learning disability even before teaching reading. This study aimed to detect the cut-off point of this test for good readers and dyslexics.

Methods: The test has 4 parts including: objects, colors, numbers and letters. 5 items are repeated on cards randomly for 10 times. Children were asked to name items rapidly. We studied 18 dyslexic students and 18 age-matched good readers between 7 and 8 years of age at second and third grades of elementary school they were recruited by non-randomize sampling into 2 groups: children with developmental dyslexia from learning disabilities centers with mean age of 100 months, and normal children with mean age of 107 months from general schools in Tehran. Good readers selected from the same class of dyslexics.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.849 for letter naming, 0.892 for color naming, 0.971 for number naming, 0.887 for picture naming, and 0.965 totally. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 1 and was 0.79, respectively. The highest sensitivity and specificity were related to number naming (1 and 0.90, respectively).