Volume 32, Issue 2 (10-2019)                   jdm 2019, 32(2): 92-97 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hekmatfar S, Mousavi S, Mohammadian H, Jafari K. Evaluation of dimensional changes and detail reproduction of three type IV dental gypsums . jdm 2019; 32 (2) :92-97
URL: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5899-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
3- Dental Student, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract:   (2300 Views)

Background and Aims: Gypsum products are used for several different purposes. Adaptation and success of casting restorations are dependent on dimensional accuracy, strength, and reproduction of details of dental gypsums. This study was designed to evaluate the dimensional changes and accurate details reproduction of three type IV dental gypsums.
Materials and Methods: 60 samples in 3 groups of dental gypsums of G30,Yeti Rock and FujirockEP were evaluated. The detail reproduction of 50 micron scratched line was analyzed by a microscope at 12× magnification. The samples were assayed for dimensional changes at 2 and 24 hours and 1 week after pouring. Photograph images were taken from samples in fixed distance by a camera (Canon D600) and analyzed in corel draw software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-square (P<0.05).
Results: There were significant differences in the details reproduction between three gypsums (P≤0.05) and the highest values was for Fujirock EP, Yeti Rock. The G30 did not reconstruct the details. There was no significant difference in the dimensional changes of the evaluated gypsums based on time (P≥0.05).
Conclusion: All three different gypsums evaluated in this study showed the dimensional stability during one week. Fujirock EP and Yeti Rock could reconstruct the details and G30 gypsum could not.
Full-Text [PDF 695 kb]   (1160 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: general
Received: 2019/10/16 | Accepted: 2019/10/16 | Published: 2019/10/16

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb