Tehran University Medical Journal

Background: Fungi have a worldwide distribution which can cause a broad spectrum of disease ranging from allergic to systemic infections, particularly in immuno-compromised individuals. Fungal spores are an important group of bioaerosols in hospital environment which are an emerging cause of hospital-acquired infection. Nosocomial infections cause significant morbidity and mortality as well as large financial burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and species distribution of airborne fungi in selected wards of two tertiary hospitals in Tehran, Iran.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, samples were collected during six months from July 2016 to December 2016 by using of settle plate method. Samples were collected from selected wards of Imam Khomeini Hospital and Children's Medical Center and then incubated at 28 °C for 8-10 days. Fungal isolates were identified using the macroscopic features of colony and microscopic characteristics in slide cultures. Yeast isolates were identified by CHROMagar candida medium. PCR-sequencing of ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA was used for identification of unknown isolates.
Results: A total of 202 colonies including 133 colonies from the Imam Khomeini Hospital and 69 colonies from the Children's Medical Center were isolated. Cladosporium spp. were the most common obtained fungi accounted for 30.1% and 47.8% of all isolates in the Imam Khomeini Hospital and the Children's Medical Center, respectively. Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus spp. were other frequent species in two hospitals. Infectious diseases ward in Imam Khomeini hospital and emergency and urology wards in Children's Medical Center had the highest rate of contamination.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the frequency and diversity of fungal spores in hospital wards were different. In addition, since the fungal contamination in the hospital environment are affected by various environmental factors and the efficiency of ventilation systems, some of these wards require better ventilation system as well as regular monitoring to remove these fungal bioaerosols in order to maintain the health of patients and health care workers.

Background: Hospitals are dealing with unlimited demands and limited resources. Hospital managers should use appropriate strategies to improve quality of services, enhance patients’ satisfaction and increase financial resources. This study aimed to examine the impact of quality management.
Methods: A participatory action research was used for the intervention on income of operating theatre in Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, between March and September 2014. A quality improvement team was established and improved operational processes of the operating theatre department of the hospital using Mosadeghrad’s ten-step quality management model. The quality improvement team standardized processes, identified goals for the processes and improved them until achieved the goals. Accordingly, an action plan was developed and implemented for increasing the income of the operating theatre department. Income data of the operating theatre department were obtained for a 6-month period in 2014, and were compared with a control 6-month period in 2013.
Results: Implementing quality management increased the number of surgeries by 14.96 percent, decreased cancelled surgeries by 14.6 percent and reduced bill deductions imposed by health insurance companies by 44.9 percent. As a result, the operation theatre department income has increased by 68.8 percent (P=0.028). Some of solutions used for increasing the income were as standardizing and improving working processes, removing unnecessary activities, empowering staff; increasing department’s working hours, on time visit of patients by doctors and surgeons, reducing surgery cancellations, increasing number of patients, reducing deductions applied by the health insurance companies and training staff and patients.
Conclusion: Implementing an appropriate quality management model appropriately helps improve quality of services and enhance hospital departments’ income.

Background: Hospital accreditation is an external evaluation of a hospital’s structures, processes and results by an independent professional accreditation body using pre-established optimum standards. Accreditation has an important role in improving the quality, safety, effectiveness and efficiency of hospital services. This study aimed to examine the effects of hospital accreditation program from hospitals managers’ perspective.
Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in 2015 using a valid and reliable questionnaire designed to examine accreditation effects on hospital performance, hospital employees, patients, and the society. The study population consisted of 914 hospital managers in Iran. Overall, 547 hospital managers were surveyed through stratified random sampling.
Results: About 71% of hospitals achieved grade one and above accreditation status. The mean score of accreditation positive effects in hospitals was 3.16±0.66 out of 5 (Average). Almost 38% of managers were satisfied with the accreditation results in their hospitals. Hospital accreditation program was successful in improving patient and staff safety, reducing medical errors and enhancing staff competencies. Its success in improving communication, promoting organizational culture, continuous quality improvement, resource utilization, and reducing nosocomial infections and hospital mortality rates was moderate. Accreditation was less successful in improving staff satisfaction, getting physicians involved in process improvement, practicing evidence based medicine, attracting patients and increasing hospital income. A statistically significant correlation was found between hospital size and accreditation results (P=0.038, r=-0.090). There was no correlation between using quality management models and getting better accreditation results (P=0.085). However, there was correlation between using accreditation consultants and positive accreditation results (P=0.045, r=-0.087). Utilizing hospital resources, organizational learning, continuous quality improvement and effective communication had the most effect on accreditation success.
Conclusion: The accreditation program had a moderate effect on hospital performance. It is costly to implement accreditation standards in hospitals. Hence, changes should be made to the accreditation system including accreditation standards and methods in order to have more positive effects on the staff and hospitals’ performance.

Background: Unnecessary patient admission to a hospital refers to the hospitalization of a patient without clinical indications and criteria. Various factors related to the patient (e.g., age, disease severity, payment method, and admission route and time), the physician and the hospital and its facilities and diagnostic technologies affect a patient unnecessary admission in a hospital. Unnecessary patient hospitalization increases nosocomial infections, morbidity and mortality, and decreases patient satisfaction and hospital productivity. This study aimed to measure unnecessary patient admissions in hospitals in Iran.
Methods: This study was conducted using a systematic review and meta-analysis at Tehran University of Medical Science in August 2019. Seven electronic databases were searched and evaluated for original research papers published between March 2006 and 2018 on patients’ unnecessary admission to a hospital. Finally, 12 articles were selected and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software.
Results: All studies used the appropriateness evaluation protocol (AEP) for assessing patients’ unnecessary hospitalization in the hospitals. Overall, 2.7% of hospital admissions were rated as inappropriate and unnecessary (CI 95%: 1.5-4.9%). The highest unnecessary patients’ admissions were 11.8% in a teaching hospital in Meshginshahr city in 2016, (CI 95%: 8.8%-15.8%) and the lowest unnecessary patients’ admissions was 0.3% in a teaching hospital in Yasuj city in 2016 (CI 95%: 0%-3.6%). Unnecessary patient admission in public hospitals was higher than private hospitals. A significant statistical correlation was observed between unnecessary patient admission, and sample size (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The rate of unnecessary hospital admission in Iran is low. However, hospital resources are wasted due to unnecessary admissions. Expanding the primary health care network, reducing hospital beds, introducing an effective and efficient patient referral system, using a fixed provider payment method, and promoting residential and social services care at macro level, and establishing utilization management committee, using the appropriateness evaluation protocol, establishing short-stay units, and implementing quality management strategies at the hospital level are useful strategies for reducing avoidable hospital admissions.

Background: Medical errors are those errors or mistakes committed by healthcare professionals due to errors of omission, errors in planning, and errors of execution of a planned healthcare action whether or not it is harmful to the patient. Medical error in hospitals increases morbidity and mortality and decreases patient satisfaction and hospital productivity. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of medical errors in Iranian hospitals.
Methods: This study was conducted using systematic review and meta-analysis approaches. All articles written in English and Persian on the prevalence of medical errors in Iranian hospitals up to March 2019 were searched in Web of Science, PubMed, Elsevier, Scopus, Magiran, IranMedex and Scientific Information Database (SID) databases, and Google and Google Scholar search engines. In addition, reference lists of the retrieved papers were hand-searched. A total of 9 studies matching the inclusion criteria were identified, reviewed, and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software.