---

Background & Aim: Clinical competence is the ability to perform professional tasks and coordinate cognitive, communication and psycho-motion skills in patient care, and empathy is one of the factors influencing clinical competence. Given the role of clinical competence in the quality of midwifery care, this study aimed to determine the effect of empathy skill training on clinical competence in midwifery students.
Methods & Materials: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 73 midwifery students and 438 pregnant women in 2015. A clinical competence questionnaire was used to assess the clinical competence of the students, which was completed in two ways by self-assessment and researcher assessment (after reviewing the student's performance for 3 times). Data were analyzed by chi-square test, independent t-test and paired t-test using the SPSS software version 16.
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean score of clinical competence in the ways of self-assessment and assessment by the researcher before the intervention (P>0.05). Results from the post-intervention showed that there was significant difference between the two groups. However, the clinical competence score by the researcher assessment in the intervention group was significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05). Also, the difference in the mean scores of the self-assessment of clinical competence before and after the intervention between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05), but the difference in the mean scores of the researcher assessment of clinical competence before and after the intervention between the two groups was significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Empathy skill training is an effective way to increase the clinical competence of students.
Clinical trial registry: IRCT 2016051127855N1
 

---

Background & Aim: Clinical competence may influence the level of compassion fatigue experienced by nursing staff. This study aimed to determine the relationship between clinical competence and compassion fatigue among emergency department nurses.
Methods & Materials: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted among nurses working in the emergency departments of teaching hospitals in Urmia in 2024. A total of 120 nurses were randomly selected for participation. Data collection was performed using three questionnaires: a socio-demographic characteristics questionnaire, Leo’s Clinical Competence Questionnaire, and Figley's Professional Quality of Life Scale. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Pearson correlation coefficient with SPSS version 23.
Results: The results showed a significant inverse relationship between clinical competence and compassion fatigue (r=-0.45; P<0.05). The mean score of clinical competence among participants was 201.13±0.54. The average scores for compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and secondary traumatic stress were 27.73±8.54, 38.73±1.81, and 28.45±4.82, respectively.
Conclusion: The results suggest that higher levels of clinical competence are associated with lower levels of compassion fatigue among emergency nurses. To mitigate compassion fatigue, nursing administrators and policymakers should consider implementing targeted strategies, such as comprehensive training, ongoing in-service education, and staffing with experienced and specialized nurses, thereby fostering a supportive work environment that reduces compassion fatigue.

 

---

Background & Aim: Clinical competence is crucial for enhancing the quality of patient care and increasing patient satisfaction with nurses. Critical thinking is a key factor that influences the clinical competence of nurses. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the relationship between critical thinking and clinical competence among nurses working in intensive care units.
Methods & Materials: This descriptive-correlational study involved 240 nurses working in intensive care units at hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2021. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling. Data collection included demographic questionnaires, the California Critical Thinking Form B, and assessments of nurses' clinical competence. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and the Spearman correlation coefficient in SPSS software version 23.
Results: The mean total score of nurses' clinical competence was 143.53 with a standard deviation of 26.62, indicating an average level of clinical competence based on the instrument's scoring. The total score for nurses' critical thinking was 17.51 with a standard deviation of 13.41, showing a relatively high level of critical thinking among the nurses in the study. A positive and significant correlation was found between the total score of clinical competence and critical thinking (r=0.147, P=0.023).
Conclusion: The results suggest that nurses with stronger critical thinking skills also demonstrate higher levels of clinical competence. Therefore, incorporating strategies to enhance critical thinking in nursing education programs can enhance students' clinical competence, better preparing them for effective clinical judgment and decision-making in complex care scenarios.
 

---

Background & Aim: The health of nurses’ work environments can influence their clinical competence and accordingly the quality of care they provide. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the relationship between a healthy work environment and clinical competence among nurses working in intensive care units of the teaching hospitals affiliated with Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences in 2023.
Methods & Materials: This cross‑sectional study was conducted using a census method on 245 nurses working in the intensive care units of Kosar, Tohid, and Besat teaching hospitals in Sanandaj during the winter of 2023. Data were collected using a demographic and occupational information form, as well as the Healthy Work Environment and Clinical Competence questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using STATA software version 12, using independent t‑test, one‑way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests.
Results: In the present study, 198 nurses (81.1%) reported their work environment health as low, 43 nurses (17.6%) as favorable, and only 3 nurses (1.3%) as very favorable. Nurses reported their clinical competence as good (86.5±2.72). No statistically significant relationship was found between a healthy work environment and overall clinical competence or its dimensions (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The lack of a significant relationship between a healthy work environment and nurses’ clinical competence in this study does not diminish the importance of providing a healthy work environment for nurses. The findings indicated that the level of work environment health was not desirable, whereas nurses’ clinical competence was good. Considering the importance of a healthy work environment, implementing measures to improve work environment health is essential.