Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Decision-Making

R Karimi, Z Parsa-Yekta, A Mehran, L Nik-Farid,
Volume 8, Issue 3 (7-2002)
Abstract

Post-surgery pain is usually controlled by PRN drugs administered by nurses. According to the decision-making theories, this clinical decision-making depends on three factors: nurse-related factors child-related factors and hospital-related factors. This study deals with the first and second factors mentioned. This descriptive-analytic study aims at determining the perspective of nurses on factors which affect their decisions to administer the analgesic PRN to children after surgery in several chosen hospitals of Tehran. The study used a standardized questionnaire to collect data from 57 nurses in pediatric surgery wards. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: 1) nurses demographic data 2) 20 clinical scenario for nurses to make a decision for prescribing either analgesic medication, non-analgesic medication or no medication where necessary and 3) 12 factors which affect clinical decision-making in using analgesics.(in prioritizing among the above mentioned). The results show that factors such as age, nursing experience, pediatric nursing experience and motherhood were significantly related to choosing to use analgesics. Education and personal experience of extreme pain was also related to the type of analgesic chosen. Concerning the specifics of the children there was a significant difference between the choice to use analgesics and the type of analgesic used according to the various ages of the children. There was also a significant relationship between the type of surgery and the time of surgery and with the choice to use analgesics and the type of analgesics used, such that medication and analgesics were administered more frequently for complicated surgeries and in first 24 hours after surgery. Type of surgery, severity of pain, time of surgery and uneasy behaviors were selected respectively as the most effective in the administration of PRN analgesic drugs. Nurse and child related factors strongly influence nurses in making decisions to administer PRN analgesics postoperatively.
Mohammad Hossein Esmaeilzadeh, Marzieh Mogharab, Seyyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini, Javad Bazeli, Amin Zamani,
Volume 25, Issue 2 (7-2019)
Abstract

Background & Aim: Improving clinical decision-making is one of the challenges of the pre-hospital emergency system. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of pre-hospital trauma management training program on the capability of clinical decision- making in emergency medical technicians.
Methods & Materials: In a randomized controlled field trial study, 64 pre-hospital emergency technicians from Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, were randomly assigned to either intervention or control groups by the stratified sampling method in 2018. For the intervention group, a pre-hospital trauma management training program was administered based on existing domestic and global standards in a two-day crash course with a combination of learning techniques including lecture and simulation. The research instruments were a demographic questionnaire and a researcher-made questionnaire on clinical decision-making, completed before the course, immediately and one month after the completion of the course. Data were analyzed by the SPSS software version 19 using independent t-test, the repeated analysis of variance and Bonferroni's post-test.
Results: The mean changes in clinical decision-making scores before and immediately after the intervention (9.31 vs. 0.3), before and one month after the intervention (7.86 vs. 1.1) and immediately after the intervention and follow-up one month after the intervention (1.62 in. vs. 1.39) were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The pre-hospital trauma management training program can improve clinical decision-making in pre-hospital emergency medical technicians. Therefore, this program can be integrated into the technicians’ training programs.
Clinical trial registry: IRCT20180802040677N1
 
Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh, Eesa Mohammadi, Masoumeh Simbar, Ahmad Reza Baghestani,
Volume 25, Issue 4 (1-2020)
Abstract

Background & Aim: Some women, throughout their life cycle, experience unintended pregnancy and had to decide on continuing or terminating it. Although the decision-making process always recurs, few studies have so far shed light on this complex, and context-based process. The aim of the present study was to explore Iranian women’s decision-making process to abort or continue an unintended pregnancy.
Methods & Materials: This was a qualitative study using grounded theory approach. Data were collected through unstructured, in-depth interviews with 29 participants in Tabriz from March 2016 to May 2017. The participants were selected through the purposeful sampling method and data collection were continued until reaching data saturation. Data analysis was carried out concurrently with the data collection, using the MAXQDA software version 10.
Results: Data analysis gave rise to four axial categories: “perceived threats”, “resistance mixed with indecision”, “values and supportive resources”, as well as “acceptance and confirmation of decision”. This means that the decision-making process among women with unintended pregnancy initially starts with a perceived threat as a main concern leading to their resistance towards accepting such a pregnancy, then exposure to threats arising from abortion can cause indecision and uncertainty in practicing abortion. In this respect, given the social support, women affected by religious values make efforts to choose the procedure with the least harm and threats and maximum acceptability and confirmability. “Confirmation of decision” is as well the outcome of the interactive process of decision-making.
Conclusion: What can differentiate the theory of decision-making on abortion or continuation of an unintended pregnancy from the general theories of decision-making is its sociocultural confirmability. Social acceptance of abortion and childbearing in line with moral evaluation of fetal development directs the confirmability process of decision-making about unintended pregnancy.
 
Sara Sharafieh, Shiva Khaleghparast, Fatemeh Ghani Dehkordi, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh,
Volume 27, Issue 3 (10-2021)
Abstract

Background & Aim: Clinical decision-making is an essential part of the nursing profession. The nursing profession is based on ethical principles. Due to their commitment to patients, morally courageous nurses ignore occupational risks threatening their own lives.  The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between moral courage of nurses and their participation in clinical decision-making.
Methods & Materials: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019. The study population was nurses working in the CCU and ICU of Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center. The sample size was 195 people. The data was collected using the Sekerka’s Moral Courage Scale, and the Participation in Decision Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient through the SPSS software version 19.
Results: The mean scores of moral courage and PDAQ in nurses were 90.38 ± 11.48 and 117.24±39.42, respectively. A positive correlation was found between moral courage and participation in clinical decision-makings (r=0.397, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results showed that moral courage has pride of place in the nursing profession that can encourage nurses to actively participate in clinical decision making. Therefore, professional ethics courses are suggested to be organized to improve decision-making and clinical ethical performance of nursing students and nurses.
 

Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb