---

Background & Aim: Poor oral care for the ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU) can result in the accumulation of pathogens and respiratory infections. In this regard, in addition to the chemical methods, a mechanical method has been recommended to be added. However, concerning its effect on pneumonia, different findings have been reported. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the effects of chlorhexidine solution with or without toothbrushing on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia among patients in ICUs.

Methods & Materials: This was a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in two selected hospitals of Ahvaz city in 2014. A convenience sample of 68 ventilated patients was randomly allocated to the toothbrush group (34 patients) or the gauze swab group (34 patients) using R software. Both groups received 0.2% Chlorhexidine solution. The intervention was performed in both groups for 3 minutes twice a day for five days. At the end of the fifth day, the development of pneumonia was assessed using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS). Data were analyzed by Chi-square and t-independent test through SPSS v.16.

Results: The two groups were similar for age, sex, cause of admission, level of consciousness, medication and tobacco use. The majority of patients (58.8%) were diagnosed with pneumonia (Group A: 55.9% and Group B: 61.8%). The Chi-square test showed no significant difference between the two groups for the development of pneumonia (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The use of Chlorhexidine solution with toothbrushing compared to using Chlorhexidine with swab could not reduce the development of pneumonia. However, due to its importance, further research is needed in this regard.

---

Background & Aim: Clinical decision-making is an essential part of the nursing profession. The nursing profession is based on ethical principles. Due to their commitment to patients, morally courageous nurses ignore occupational risks threatening their own lives.  The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between moral courage of nurses and their participation in clinical decision-making.
Methods & Materials: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019. The study population was nurses working in the CCU and ICU of Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center. The sample size was 195 people. The data was collected using the Sekerka’s Moral Courage Scale, and the Participation in Decision Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient through the SPSS software version 19.
Results: The mean scores of moral courage and PDAQ in nurses were 90.38 ± 11.48 and 117.24±39.42, respectively. A positive correlation was found between moral courage and participation in clinical decision-makings (r=0.397, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results showed that moral courage has pride of place in the nursing profession that can encourage nurses to actively participate in clinical decision making. Therefore, professional ethics courses are suggested to be organized to improve decision-making and clinical ethical performance of nursing students and nurses.
 

---

Background & Aim: Mothers with premature babies are more likely to experience anxiety than mothers with full-term babies. The separation of the mother from the baby disrupts physical contact with the baby, which is the most important component affecting attachment. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a group positive thinking program on anxiety and attachment in mothers with premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.
Methods & Materials: This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted in Kermanshah in 2020. A total of 72 mothers with premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Imam Reza and Mohammad Kermanshahi hospitals were randomly assigned into two groups of control and intervention. The Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory and Postpartum Attachment Scale were used to collect the data. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 16 using statistical tests (ANOVA and Chi-Square).
Results: There was no significant difference in the state anxiety levels before (p =0.791) and after the intervention (p =0.373) between the control and intervention groups. Likewise, no statistically significant difference was observed in the latent anxiety levels before (p =0.831) and after the intervention (p =0.093) between the two groups but comparing the amount of changes showed a significant difference (p =0.025). Regarding attachment, none of the attachment subscales had a statistically significant difference between the two groups before the intervention (p>0.05). After the intervention, a significant difference was observed in the scores of the subscales “lack of hostility" and "satisfaction with the interaction" (p<0.05).
Conclusion: According to the findings of the study, the group positive thinking training is recommended to the nurses and managers of neonatal intensive care units as a complementary program, along with the routine care for mothers of premature infants.
Clinical trial registry: IRCT20210108049965N1