---

Background & Aim: Youths are the most at risk group for HIV/AIDS in the world and education of the preventive measurements is the most effective way for decreasing the incidence of HIV/AIDS among them. Due to ever-increasing cases of HIV and the importance of education, we compared the effects of three educational methods (peer education, education by physician and giving pamphlets) on knowledge of female high school students&apos of Kerman shah on HIV/AIDS.

Methods & Materials: One thousand and five hundred female third grade students were recruited from 21 high schools using stratified random sampling method. An average of 73 students were selected from each school and participated in a pre-test exam using a questionnaire. Of 1500 students, 498 and 502 students were taught by general practitioners and peers, respectively. Pamphlets were presented to 500 other students. Twenty days after the educational intervention, the participants were contributed in a post-test exam using the very questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics via SPSS version 11.5.

Results: The students&apos mean age was 16.78 (SD=0.7). The mean scores of pretests and post-tests in all 3 groups were significantly different (P<0.001). The mean score for the group taught by general practitioners (10.7±3.6) was higher than the scores of other two group scores (8.8±3.4 and 7.3±3.9, respectively for peer education and pamphlet groups) after the interventions. Bonferroni statistical test showed the significant difference (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Education presented by general practitioners seems to be more effective than the other two ways in increasing students&apos knowledge about HIV/AIDS.

---

Background & Aim: Providing self-care education to patients and their family leads to improvement in the quality of life and increase in participation in self-care programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of education by peer and nurse on self-care in hemodialysis patients.
Methods & Materials: In this quasi-experimental study, 105 hemodialysis patients from three selected hospitals in three cities of Isfahan province (Zarinshahr, Falavarjan and Mobarakeh) were selected by the simple random sampling method from February 2016 to September 2016. Three centers were randomly assigned to three groups including education by peer, education by nurse and control. The individual face-to-face education was provided by the peer or the nurse to hemodialysis patients, and the control group only received routine education. Data gathering tool was the hemodialysis patients’ self-care questionnaire which was completed for three groups before and one month after education. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 18 through Chi-square test, paired t test, the analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test at the significance level of P<0.05.
Results: There were no significant differences between the three groups in age, duration of dialysis, gender, and level of education (P>0.05). The Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests showed that the effect of nurse intervention on self-care improvement was significantly more than peer intervention and the control group (P<0.001) and also the effect of peer intervention on self-care improvement was significantly more than the control group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Education by a nurse is effective in the self-care behaviors of hemodialysis patients and will improve these behaviors. Also, using peer experiences has advantages for hemodialysis patients such as easy, low-cost and effective education, based on life experiences and lack of need for special equipment.