---

Introduction: There are different methods of teacher evaluation .The aim of this study was to investigate process of teacher evaluation in selected Iranian Medical of Sciences Universities.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, we investigate the existing documents and performed serial semi-structured interviews with evaluation staff in the universities. The implementation of the whole process of staff evaluation at universities were also observed. The data were analyzed considering both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The descriptive analytic method as well as content analysis was applied for data analysis.
Results: Review of the teachers by students was the dominant method for teacher evaluation in the selected universities. This method have some important advantages and disadvantages which are discussed in this article according to the findings.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it is highly recommended to use a combination of different methods for evaluation of the university teachers as well as decision making purposes.

---

Background & Aim: In the view of the importance of evidence-based clinical practice in recent years, clinical disciplines such as nursing and midwifery have found a special need to systematic review and meta-analysis. However, systematic reviews and meta-analysises like any other studies may be poorly designed and implemented. Therefore, certain guidelines have been considered for reporting of such studies. The PRISMA statement is one of the most recent developments to improve the reporting quality of systematic reviews. The present study aimed to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysises in the Iranian journals of Nursing and Midwifery, based on the PRISMA statement.

Methods & Materials: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive search on the Iranian journals of Nursing and Midwifery (Persian and English), indexed by the SID, Magiran, Irandoc, Iranmedex and Google Scholar databases during 2010 to 2015 years. The search was implemented using the key words such as systematic review and meta-analysis. Of the 44 articles found, after considering the inclusion criteria, 16 articles remained that were investigated using the PRISMA statement. Data were analyzed through the descriptive statistics and chi-square test using SPSS software version 16.

Results: The compliance rate of studies on the basis of PRISMA statement was estimated to be about 63%. The most common deficiency in the reporting quality was related to methodology estimated to be about 57%. The most visible deficiencies in the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysises were related to bias in the primary studies and bias in combining the results of these studies and lack of reporting these biases.

Conclusion: In this study, the reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysises in the Iranian journals of nursing and midwifery was in the moderate level. The most probable reason for this may be the lack of enough attention of researchers to the PRISMA statement or not using this statement in reviewing articles. Therefore, it is recommended that an appropriate share of the educational programs on research methodology be allocated to systematic reviews and familiarizing with valid criteria such as PRISMA statement.

---

Background & Aim: Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are a serious occupational hazard for health care providers and nurses that are often not reported for various reasons. Several studies have reported a different rate of this great challenge. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the prevalence of under-reporting of NSIs in healthcare providers in Iran.
Methods & Materials: By searching national and international databases including SID, Magiran, Google Scholar, IranMedex, Science Direct, PubMed and Scopus, 19 published articles were extracted. Data analysis was carried out through the random-effects model, and heterogeneity was investigated by I² index. The data were analyzed using the Stata software version 12.0.
Results: The rate of non-reporting of NSIs in 19 relevant articles in Iran with the sample size of 9274 was 59% (95% CI: 49-69). The rate of under-reporting of NSIs in the healthcare providers (64%) was higher than in nurses (55%). Based on the meta-regression results, there was no significant relationship between the prevalence of under-reporting of NSIs and the year of publication (P=0.138), sample size (P=0.390) and age (P=0.918).
Conclusion: The results of the study showed that more than half of health care providers did not report NSIs. Notifying health care providers about the risks of NSIs and properly dealing with the injured cases is necessary in order to increase the reporting of NSIs.
 

---

Background & Aim: Empowerment is a dynamic, positive, interactive and social process, leading to the improvement of quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic disease. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of family-centered empowerment model (FCEM) on QOL in adults with chronic diseases.
Methods & Materials: By searching FCEM in Persian databases including SID, MagIran, IranMedex, IranDoc, and googlescholar, Scopus, Pubmed, Web-of-science, Proquest, and Sciencedirect, all relevant studies were extracted. The methodological quality of the papers was examined using Cochrane-risk-of-bias. Data analysis was carried out through the random effects model and heterogeneity by I² index. The data were analyzed using the STATA software version 11.0.
Results: Of the 647 initial studies, only 8 studies examined the effect of FCEM on the QOL in adult patients using SF-36. The pooled standardized mean difference of the 8-dimensions of QOL included: social-functioning (1.781), Physical role limitation (1.416), bodily pain (0.987), general health (1.352), social functioning (1.010), general health (1.122), emotional role limitation (0.656), and vitality (1.361).
Conclusion: The implementation of FCEM had a significant effect on the 8-dimensions of QOL based on the SF-36 questionnaire. The implementation of FCEM is recommended in order to improve the QOL of adult patients with chronic disease.
 

---

Background & Aim: Female genital cancers are the third most common type of malignancy among women. Considering the importance of these cancers, the present study was conducted to determine the age-standardized rate (ASR) of female genital cancers in Iran.
Methods & Materials: In this systematic review, six international databases (Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar), and four national databases (Scientific Information Database, MagIran, IranMedex, and IranDoc) were searched in 2017. Thereafter, Persian and English papers referring to the ASR of female genital cancers in Iran were included. The Joanna Briggs checklist was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers.
Results: A total of 264 papers were found in the initial search of the databases, and 27 papers were included for final analysis. Based on the random-effect model, the ASR was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.83-2.31) for cervical cancer, 3.15 (95% CI, 2.75-3.54) for ovarian cancer, and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.32-1.73) per 100,000 for uterine cancer.
Conclusion: The ASR of female genital cancers in Iran was lower than other countries of the world. It should be noted that the results of this review must be judged with caution because of the high heterogeneity of the studies.
 

---

Background & Aim: Nursing prescription is an expanding category with many supporters and critics. The present research attempts to answer three questions: What are the fields of activity of nurse prescribers? What are the challenges of nursing prescription? and what are the positive outcomes of nursing prescription?
Methods & Materials: In the present systematic review, all relevant papers published until March 2017, were examined. Search was done in databases: SID, Iran Medex, Iran Doc, Magiran, Science Direct, Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and with keywords: nursing prescription, nurse prescribing, nurse prescriber, independent prescribing, supplementary prescribing and their equivalent terms in persian. Inclusion criteria were articles in English or persian, quasi experimental, questionnaire based study, qualitative study and relevant to the objectives of the study. Exclusion criteria were review articles, posters, presentation, and letter to the editor.
Results: A total of 72 articles that were included in the systematic review, showed extensive nurse prescribing activity in the fields of diabetes, mental health, rheumatology, dermatology, primary care, elderly care, epilepsy, pain, asthma, hypertension, constipation, emergency, hemodialysis, glaucoma and elderly. Challenges included: the critical look of the care team and lack of support, lack of attention to professional competence assessment, legal constraints, and lack of community awareness of the role of nurse purscribers. The positive outcomes of nursing prescription were classified in three areas related to the patient, the nurse and the organization.
Conclusion: Nurse prescribing activity is changing, and identifying its challenges and outcomes will help it progress.
 

---

Background & Aim: Postoperative pain is one of the clinical challenges for nurses who care for patients. The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of preoperative education on postoperative pain after elective surgery.
Methods & Materials: A literature search was done on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE to find the articles published in English on clinical trials from January 2012 to June 2018.
Results: Out of 153 studies retrieved, 13 studies (2482 people) were reviewed. Generally, most studies indicated the effectiveness of preoperative education on postoperative pain relief (7 studies, n=1678). In other studies, there was no significant difference between education and the degree of pain reduction in the patient. Also, the results of some studies (n=204) showed that education with empathy could reduce anxiety in half of the cases.
Conclusion: Preoperative education as a complex intervention can reduce postoperative pain. Interactive education with empathy reduces patient’s anxiety and the need for postoperative analgesics. Therefore, training skilled nurses and the providers of such education is suggested for managing pain in patients.
 

---

Background & Aim: Pregnancy and childbirth is one of the most important events in the life of every woman that can be a memorable experience with positive consequences for the mother and the baby, under support of others, especially the spouse. Numerous interventions to promote men's participation have been conducted during this period. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of a systematic review of men's participation in prenatal care.
Methods & Materials: This study is a systematic review of published articles on strategies to promote male participation, during pregnancy, childbirth and after childbirth (from 2000 to 2019), based on PRISMA guidelines, and the search was conducted by two scholars on the valid databases. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies, published on strategies for increasing male participation during perinatal period, published in national and international journals, were included in the study. Qualitative assessment of the articles was done using the Jadad and CONSORT checklist and the data extraction was based on the researcher's checklist.
Results: In this systematic review, 4808 articles were identified. After reviewing the titles, and considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were included in the study. The promotion strategies were categorized into four groups: female-centered, couple-centered, community-centered, and facility-centered.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, in order to promote the participation of men in perinatal care, it should be planned on four areas of female-centered, couple-centered, community-centered and facility-centered.
 

---

Background & Aim: Although pain control in patients with burns has improved over recent years, the ineffectiveness of some treatments to reduce pain in this group of patients remains a challenging issue for health care professionals. This systematic review was conducted to investigate nursing interventions in the field of pain relief in burn patients.
Methods & Materials: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, relevant information was searched from databases PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Irandoc, SID, and Cochrane library with keywords nursing interventions, pain, burns and their equivalent Persian keywords in the period 2010-2020. To increase the validity and reliability of the study, three people evaluated the quality of the articles separately and Jedad criterion was used to evaluate the articles.
Results: After assessing 181 articles on the databases, 19 articles were systeatically reviewed. Nursing interventions to reduce pain in burn patients included using breathing techniques, new dressings, muscle relaxation, music therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), electrical brain stimulation, play therapy, aromatherapy, use of Zekr Allah, massage, guided imagery, distraction techniques, and eye movement desensitization. In eight meta-analyses, total mean differences of pain relief score were estimated 1.28 (0.95% CI: 0.78-1.78).
Conclusion: Most nursing interventions reduced pain in burn patients. Easier-to-use pain relief techniques such as muscle relaxation, guided imagery, and spiritual care are emphasized.