Showing 8 results for Hasani
Bagher Larijani, Farid Abolhasani, Mohammad Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani, Ozra Tabtabaie,
Volume 4, Issue 3 (17 2005)
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is one of the chronic metabolic diseases with several organ damages that dearese life span. Prevalence of known diabetes appears to be increasing in most countries, presumably due to increasing the prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, lower physical activity and improved diagnosis. WHO expect the number of adults (20 years and older) with diabetes rises up to 300 millions in 2025. In view of the worldwide geographic differences in diabetes and lack of documented informations about prevalence of diabetes in Iran, we assigned this study.
Methods: The base of our study for assessment of prevalence of diabetes in Iran was results of ״Health and Disease Study in Iran, 1999״. We used epidemiologic model (DisMod) for estimating the incidence of diabetes in Iran.
Results: The prevalence of diabetes in over 20 years of Iranian population in 2000, was 1.6 million or 4.67%. Also it is estimated up to 100000 persons have been affected by type II diabetes.
Conclusion: The true limitation of our study was limitations of documents about estimated of proportion of true prevalence to prevalence of known diabetes.
Farshad Forouzandeh, Alireza Aziz Ahari, Farid Abolhasani, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 4, Issue 4 (17 2005)
Abstract
Background: Foot complications are among the important problems of diabetic patients. Vascular and neurological involvements are two major causes for such complications.
Methods: We studied 142 diabetic outpatients referred to diabetes clinic of Dr.Shariati Hospital from Dec. 2003 to Sep. 2004. We performed different neurological and vascular tests to assess the diabetic foot and data were analyzed by SPSS software.
Results: 54.9% of the cases reached the symptom score of 5 and upper so they had neuropathy regarding the Michigan Neuropathy Disability Score (MNDS). By analyzing the overall symptom and sign scores, 61% had neuropathy. Regarding MNDS, 42.7% of the subjects were neuropathic. Finally 23.9% were unable to sense at least one point from 12 points of monofilament examination. 16.9% of the patients had the complaint of intermittent claudication, in 8.8% at least one of the peripheral pulses was not palpable, whereas 10.6% had some degree of PAD regarding to ABI and toe pressure.
Conclusion: Using a monofilament is the most reliable method for screening of the neuropathy in diabetic patients. On the other hand, relying on symptoms like intermittent claudication and physical examination in order to find peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients may lead to miss many cases, thus, performing some more precise diagnostic tests, such as ABI and toe pressure are highly recommended and reliable.
Farid Abolhasani, Mohammad Reza Mohagerie Tehrani, Ozra Tabatabaei, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (18 2005)
Abstract
Background: Since by considering increases worldwide prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and its management in the short and long–term requires significant expenditure on the part of patients and healthcare providers alike, and on the other hand existing resources fall short of the country's needs in this domain, diabetes has become one of the major health priorities in our country, as it has across the globe. Assessment of injuries due to diabetes mellitus and complications are divided to two sections: 1– economic cost of diabetes mellitus and 2 – burden of diabetes mellitus. In this study we assessed burden of diabetes mellitus and complications in Iran in year 2000.
Methods: We used ten years ago studies about prevalence of diabetes and complications in Iran, associated DALYs index by helping computer model (DisMod) for assessment of burden of diabetes and complications in Iran in year 2000.
Results: Burden of diabetes in Iran was 306440 years in year 2000. Burden of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, diabetic foot and lower limb amputation were 20532, 20532, 33286, 5848 and 1573 years, respectively.
Conclusion: Pay attention to this study, we will need to reduce diabetes's burden by setting serious programs about prevention and treatment of diabetes mellitus and complications. Thus, we suggest, other studies are planning for assessment of burden of other diseases. Then after comparing burden of diabetes to other diseases, government politicians are performance priorities setting for using of our country resource.
Shirin Hasani Ranjbar, Javad Tavakkoly Bazzaz, Parvin Amiri, Mahsa M.amoli, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 6, Issue 3 (17 2007)
Abstract
Background: Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Adiponectin gene have been associated with BMI, insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes, reportedly. In present study we performed a genetic association study for Adiponectin gene at position +45*T/G in type 2 diabetes and normal subjects of Tehran population.
Methods: Diabetic patients were selected from diabetes clinic and normal healthy control subjects aged between 25-64 years selected from zone 17 of Tehran. Adiponectin gene polymorphism was analyzed using PCR-RFLP method in normal healthy controls (N=70), obese diabetic patients (N=80) and non-obese diabetic patients (N=72).
Results: Frequency of TT genotype was 62.5% in non-obese diabetic patients and 78% in control group, that was statistically significant (TT vs TG+GG: P=0.02, OR=2.2, CI:0.98-5.00). There was also a significant difference for allele T and G frequencies when we compared between non-obese diabetic patients and controls group. The frequency of allele G was increased in non-obese diabetic (20.1%) patients compared to controls (12%) (P: 0.04 OR: 1.8 CI: 0.9-3.7).
Conclusion: This study showed TG and GG alleles of Adiponectin gene polymorphism at position +45*T/G are risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus while this effect is independent from BMI and obesity.
Farzaneh Ahanjideh, Abbas Ali Keshtkar, Moloud Payab, Mostafa Qorbani, Neda Shaygan, Tayeb Ramim, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar,
Volume 14, Issue 3 (3-2015)
Abstract
Background: Evidences exist that abdominal obesity is a difference in terms of body mass index (BMI) and these two factors have different effects on bone density. This study examined the association between body mass index, obesity, the history of fracture and bone mineral density in Iranian population. There exist evidences on the effects of body mass index (BMI) and abdominal obesity, and the role of this two factor on bone density. This study examined the association between body mass index, abdominal obesity, and the frequency of fracture with bone mineral density in Iranian population Methods: The Study was done as a cross-sectional, population-based retrospective study. People over 18 years were included in the third part of the IMOS project (National comprehensive plan for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis). Abdominal obesity was calculated based on waist to hip ratio that was considered positive > 0.95 in men and 0.85 in women. The linear regression test was used to examine the relationship between BMI and abdominal obesity with bone densitometry. Results: A total 2019 cases (717 men, 1302 women) with 41.85 ± 13.95 years enrolled in this study. Almost, 36% of men and women were obese based on waist circumference. Correlation coefficients of BMI with bone density were equal 0.236 for Hip, 0.133 for femoral neck, 0.138 for lumbar spine. Waist to hip ratio was inversely associated with bone density. Bone densities in the hip and lumbar spine, in individuals with a positive history of wrist fracture were significantly lower than those with a negative history of fracture. Conclusion: contrary to the total body fat, abdominal obesity based on waist to hip ratio is inversely associated with bone density. In other words, abdominal obesity increases the risk of fractures by reducing the bone density without creating protective shield of adipose tissue in vulnerable areas.
Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Hanieh Malmir, Azin Pakmehr, Rezvan Razmande, Yasaman Khorshidi, Golaleh Asghari, Ahmadreza Soroush, Afshin Ostovar, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 23, Issue 6 (1-2024)
Abstract
Background: Considering the increasing and alarming trend of overweight and obesity as well as its related complications, in this study, a comprehensive clinical guide for the medical care of patients with obesity was written based on the clinical recommendations of the American Endocrinology Association and the American College of Endocrinology, and it has been adjusted as much as possible based on the conditions in Iran.
Methods: A complete search was performed in the available databases without any restrictions with a specific strategy. Using the opinions of experts in this field, the best clinical guidelines were selected and obesity clinical guidelines were written for Iranian adults. Recommendations were given based on a detailed review of available clinical evidence and considering objective factors.
Results: A total of 1788 references were used and in response to 9 clinical questions, 123 recommendations, including 160 special statements, were provided to determine a comprehensive medical care program for obesity. In this article, we discuss the prevention, screening, diagnosis, benefits and goals of obesity treatment. Questions 6 to 9 regarding obesity treatment steps and its individualization will be published in the next part of the article.
Conclusion: The detailed evidence-based questions and recommendations outlined in this study identify clinical considerations that facilitate decision-making in obese patients from screening and diagnosis to goals of treatment.
Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Hanieh Malmir, Rezvan Razmandeh, Azin Pakmehr, Yasaman Khorshidi, Golaleh Asghari, Amir Mohammad Mortazavian, Mohammad Reza Mohajer-Tehrani, Afshin Ostovar, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 24, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of overweight, obesity and related complications is increasing rapidly in the world. Also, treating this disease in the presence or absence of co-morbidities has become a challenge. In this article, based on the clinical recommendations of the American Endocrinology Association and the American College of Endocrinology, a comprehensive clinical guide has been written for the stages of treating obese patients and its individualization, and it has been tried to be adjusted as much as possible based on the conditions in Iran.
Methods: with a specific search strategy, a complete search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar Cochrane databases. Then, the best clinical guidelines suitable for the Iranian society were selected and using the opinions of specialists and clinical experts, a clinical guideline was prepared for the treatment of obesity in Iranian adults.
Results: In this article, in continuation of the previous article, we answered the questions number 4 to 6 regarding the stages of obesity treatment and its individualization in adults of Iranian society, and presented a total of 60 recommendations in this regard.
Conclusion: In this part of the clinical guide for obesity in Iranian adults, we tried to have a special view on the treatment of these patients and by providing evidence-based recommendations and statements, the treatment process was personalized as much as possible for patients with special conditions so that decision-making in this regard is facilitated for the relevant colleagues in this field.
Somayeh Hasani, Seyedeh Maryan Moshirian Farahi, Haniyeh Zarif Golbar Yazdi,
Volume 25, Issue 6 (1-2026)
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the efficacy of the “Rehacom” cognitive rehabilitation software on five key cognitive domains—working memory, information processing speed, attention, inhibition, and executive functions—in patients diagnosed with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Methods: A pre-test/post-test experimental design with a control group was employed. A sample of 30 diabetic patients was recruited via convenience sampling and randomly allocated to either the experimental group (receiving Rehacom software intervention for 12 sessions) or the control group. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Rehacom software itself and the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS). Each session lasted 45 minutes.
Results: Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) revealed a significant overall effect of the intervention on the composite of dependent variables (Wilks’ Lambda= 0.184, F (5.24)= 7.978, P< 0.001). Subsequent Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) indicated that the intervention significantly enhanced “attention” (η²= 0.236, P= 0.016) and “executive functions” (η²= 0.621, P< 0.001). However, no significant impact was observed on working memory, information processing speed, or inhibition.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the Rehacom software serves as an effective tool for improving attention and executive functions in diabetic patients. The notable effect sizes for these two domains underscore its clinical utility in cognitive rehabilitation programs for chronic patients. The absence of effects on other components may be attributable to factors such as the limited duration of the intervention, specific software exercises, or the underlying neurochemical and pathophysiological characteristics of diabetes, warranting further investigation with more robust designs.