Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Gholamnia

Mohaad-Reza Mohebbi, Koshyar Azam Vaghefi, Ahmad Montazeri, Mehrnoosh Abtahi, Sogol Oktahi, Reza Gholamnia, Fatemeh Aliasgari, Reza Saeedi,
Volume 6, Issue 2 (9-2013)
Abstract

Background and objectives: In this research, an innovative drinking water quality index for assessing water resources as “modified drinking water quality index (MDWQI)” was developed and applied for evaluating all of the groundwater resources utilized for community water supply in urban areas of Iran during 2011. Materials and methods: Twenty-three water quality parameters and relevant Iranian standards for drinking water quality were selected as input parameters and benchmarks respectively. The MDWQI is calculated using three factors including the number of parameters that excurse benchmarks, the number of measurements in a dataset that excurse benchmarks and the magnitude of excursions. The MDWQI scores range from 0 to 100 and classify water quality in five categories as excellent (95-100), good (80-94), fair (65-79), marginal (45-64), and poor (0-44). Results: According to the MDWQI value, about 95% of the groundwater resources were in the good condition and the others were in the fair or marginal condition also the best and the worst water quality of water resources were observed in Ardebil Province and Qom Province respectively. The three parameters of fluoride, magnesium, and nitrate recorded the highest rates of violation to be 74, 32, and 13% respectively. Conclusion: The nationwide average score of the MDWQI was 85 (good description). This study indicated that the MDWQI and its sub-indices could describe the overall water quality of water bodies easily, reliably and correctly and have the potential suitability for extensive application all over the world.


Negin Alaei Borujeni, Reza Gholamnia, Amin Bagheri, Amir Kavousi, Reza Saeedi,
Volume 18, Issue 4 (3-2026)
Abstract

Background and Objective: Performance assessment of health, safety, and environmental (HSE) management is the process of applying and estimating components and indicators through which the extent of achieving organizational objectives, as well as progress and continuous improvement in the HSE domain, can be determined. In this study, a performance assessment index for urban HSE management using a process–outcome approach was developed and applied in Isfahan.
Materials and Methods: The index design process included the following steps: (1) extracting preliminary list of principles and indicators, (2) determining the principles and indicators through expert panel consultation, (3) assigning weights to the components of the index, (4) defining integration functions, and (5) classifying the index score. The required data for evaluating HSE management in Isfahan were collected through visits to relevant organizations, existing reports and studies, and public surveys.
Results: The performance assessment index of urban HSE management, including 16 principles and 61 indicators, was validated based on expert panel opinions, and the total weights of process-oriented and outcome-based indicators were 0.16 and 0.84, respectively. The HSE performance score for Isfahan was 66.4, indicating a medium level. The most important domains identified for improvement of HSE management in Isfahan (based on high weight and low performance score) were ambient air quality, access to health-care services, solid waste management, prevention of resource degradation and loss, public education, and top management commitment.
Conclusion: The developed index demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness in assessing the performance of urban HSE management and due to comprehensiveness and flexibility can be applied to other cities.
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb