Iranian Journal of

Background and Objectives: Aydughmush dam was built on Aydughmush River at 19km in southwest of Mianeh City. The dam is multipurpose and its main aims are the spring floods control, supplying potable water for villages and providing irrigation water. Different pollutants which probably discharge to the river finally enter to the dam reservoir so this study focuses on evaluating the quality of the dam reservoir.
Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study standard field parameters including dissolved oxygen, temperature, Biochemical and chemical oxygen Demand, Most Probable Number of Coliforms, Fecal Coliform, Turbidity, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Solids, pH, conductivity and others were measured at eight different stations during the spring and summer in 2010. Sampling points were selected on the basis of their importance. Water quality index was calculated using water quality index calculator given by National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) information system.
Results: The highest value of WQI of the samples was 84.89 in A3 station in July while the lowest value was 67.96 in A2 station in May. The lower value of WQI has been found mainly due to the slightly lower value of DO in the dam reservoir water. Most of the water samples were found within Good category of National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (NSF-WQI). Comparison of the measured parameters based on the sampling stations and  various months by variance and t-student analysis showed a significant relationship for some parameters(P<0.05). Nutrient budget determination indicates that the concentration of phosphate, nitrite, nitrate and ammonia at inlet are higher than outlet of the dam reservoir.
Conclusion: The calculated (WQI) showed good water quality. Based on the results of NSFQWI calculations, the dam reservoir water quality is suitable for various purposes.

Background and Objectives: Dez dam located on Karun River is one of the largest Iranian dams. In a field study, EC, NO₃, NH₄, PO₄, turbidity, TS, alkalinity, coli, temperature, chlorophyll a, DO, BOD₅, and Secchi disk (at depths of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50 m)were measured at five sampling points during 2011-2012 water year. Materials and Methods: Water Quality Index and TSI were calculated for all sampling points and quality zonation was conducted in GIS. Results: It was found that the best water quality index for reservoir water is at second sampling point with amount of 61 situated at the center of reservoir, and the worst index is at entering point to the reservoir with amount of 46 in April. The main reason of changes was turnover of thermal stratification. Conclusion: The laboratory analysis and assessing the quality indices revealed that the Dez reservoir water is suitable for variety of public uses, however, it needs advanced treatment for drinking purpose. Moreover, in the case of continuity of pollutant entrance into the reservoir, the eutrophication risk would threaten the reservoir water quality. Eutrophication occurrence will cause serious limitations in water use applicability, increase turbidity, produce toxic materials, and increase sedimentation regime.

Background and Objectives: Due to the importance of Sanandaj Gheshlagh Reservoir (SGR) in the region and proven mercury pollution in SGR water, a research project was carried out to determine the amount of mercury concentration and bioaccumulation and its behavior through a food route in SGR food chain (i.e., water, sediments, fish, and human).This was done, because it has been reported that mercury concentration and its toxicity could increase during mercury exchange between trophic levels. Materials and methods: During April to December 2012, 24 water, sediment, and fish samples (Capoetta trutta) (4 samples per month) from SGR and 24 human hair samples from Sarab Ghamish village settlers (the major Capoetta trutta consumers in the region) were collected. Results: Total mercury mean concentration in water, sediment, Capoeta trutta, and human hair were 0.0028±0.000128, 0.110±0.0057, 0.296±0.0119, 2.059±0.1704 ppm respectively. Calculated bioconcentration factors were 4 × 10 and 1 × 10² in SGR sediment and fish, and related biomagnifications factors were 40 and 5 respectively. Conclusion: Due to the high bioaccumulation, biomagnifications factors and mercury concentration recorded in edible parts of SGR fish, local consumers should not eat more than 1182 gram of this fish weekly without accounting for other potential sources of total mercury in their food basket.