V Past, K Yaghmaeian, R Nabizadeh Nodehi , Mh Dehghani, M Momeni, M Naderi,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (9-2017)
Abstract
Background and Objective: Environmental pollution due to dumping construction and demolition wastes has adverse effects on public health. This study aimed to select the best method for managing construction and demolition wastes disposal in Tehran by AHP.
Materials and Methods: This research was a descriptive study. The study population consisted of environmental health experts in the field of construction waste management. Initially, criteria and alternatives for construction waste management, recycling and reuse and landfilling were identified and classified. Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), different outcomes were compared based on scoring by Expert Choice 11 software.
Results: The results of this study showed that the discharge percentage in the permanent landfills was 68%, in temporary pits was 9% and in recovery centers was 23% in the last 6 years. The final priority of criteria with respect to the economical criterion was reuse (0.492), recycling (0.274) and landfilling (0.235), respectively. Also, according to the environmental criterion, the scores for reuse, recycling and landfilling were 0.492, 0.373 and 0.198 respectively. Based on social criterion the calculated scores were 0.5, 0.279 and 0.222 for landfilling, recycling and reuse, respectively.
Conclusion: In this study, the reuse option with the weight of 0.439 was the best disposal option; and the recycling option with the weight of 0.312 was the second priority. Landfilling showed the lowest score with the weight of 0.250.
M Ansari, M Fahiminia, M Farzadkia,
Volume 11, Issue 4 (3-2019)
Abstract
Background and Objective: Rural wastewater management is recognized as one of the pillars of sustainable development. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess needs and prioritization of establishment of rural wastewater management facilities in order to supply a safe and alternative water source in the provinces of Iran experiencing severe water stress.
Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study which was carried out in rural areas of the provinces with severe water stress (South Khorasan, Khorasan Razavi, Fars, Isfahan, Yazd, Semnan, Qom, Sistan and Baluchistan) in 2017-2018. In this study, the number of sample rural areas was calculated by Cochran method and the determination of the sample rural area was done by stratified sampling. The data related to the sample rural area was collected using a validated constructor questionnaire.
Results: The results of this study showed that the difference among all the studied provinces in terms of their priority in establishing rural waste water management facilities to provide a safe and alternative water source was very low. The provinces of Isfahan, Semnan and Fars were rated at 76 out of 100, while the provinces of South Khorasan and Sistan and Baluchestan scored 71 points.
Conclusion: With emphasis on comprehensive decision making criteria based on sustainable development, the results of this study showed that the provinces with severe water stress have a high priority regarding the establishment of rural sewage management projects in order to provide a safe and alternative water sources.
Narges Lasemi, Mahdi Hadi, Simin Nasseri,
Volume 13, Issue 4 (2-2021)
Abstract
Background and Objective: One of the most important factors affecting communities’ health is safe drinking water. The UN general assembly considers “ensure availability and sustainable water and sanitation for all “as one of the 17 goals of SDGs for the 2030 development agenda. Target 6.1 of SDGs aims to provide universal and equitable access to affordable drinking water and to provide safe drinking water for all households. Target 6.2 calls for an end to defecation in an open environment to ensure that each person has access to the toilet and safe disposal system. In current study, 143 Savadkooh villages with defects in water supply systems and health services were selected to update the indicators and implement sustainable development goals.
Materials and Methods: A checklist was designed to extract targets 6.1 and 6.2 based on the Joint Monitoring Program (JMP). Considering 7400 households, margin of error of 5%, confidence limit of 95%, and the most conservative mode for response distribution (50%), the sample size was determined (512 households). Samples were collected randomly from all villages and then analysis was performed by SPSS 19.
Results: In drinking water sector, 84% of people have access to safe services, while only 15% and 1% have access to basic services and unimproved services, respectively. In sanitation sector, 98.8% of people use safe services though only 0.2% utilize limited services. In hygiene sector, 98.8% of people are provided with safe services.
Conclusion: Lack of drinking water safety and failure to improve water resources’ quality are the main problems in the drinking water sector. Lack of access to sewage network, wastewater disposal in the land is the biggest health hazard in the region. This study can provide solutions to improve the health quality of affected community.
