Ethical Challenges in Admission and Resource Allocation for Patients in Need of Rehabilitation Services

Hosseinabadi Farahani, MohammadJavad

Volume 17 - Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics IJMEHM 2024, 17 - Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics : 1-2 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Hosseinabadi Farahani M. Ethical Challenges in Admission and Resource Allocation for Patients in Need of Rehabilitation Services. IJMEHM 2024; 17 (S1) :1-2
URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6924-en.html

Ethical Challenges in Admission and Resource Allocation for Patients in Need of Rehabilitation Services

MohammadJavad Hosseinabadi Farahani ^*

Assistant Professor, Nursing Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciencess; Assistant Professor, Clinical Research Development Center, Rofeideh Hospital, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract: (1008 Views)

Ethical challenges and concerns have long been a part of healthcare, primarily focusing on acute care or end-of-life decisions. However, with the growing elderly population and society's emphasis on restoring patients to the highest possible level of functioning, ethical dilemmas in rehabilitation care have garnered increasing attention. Ethical decisions are a routine part of rehabilitation care. While some are straightforward, such as obtaining informed consent for therapeutic and rehabilitation procedures, others are far more complex. Among the most significant challenges are resource allocation and the selection of patients for rehabilitation services. The process of selecting patients for admission to rehabilitation centers is typically carried out by specialist physicians. However, many centers face demand that exceeds their capacity, necessitating difficult decisions about patient prioritization. Although some centers may have clear guidelines, patient selection is often subjective, involving multiple factors such as:

Clinical considerations: Diagnosis, prognosis, secondary complications, and learning ability.
Non-clinical factors: Social, occupational, personal, and financial circumstances.

This subjectivity in patient selection raises several ethical concerns. The rights, duties, and responsibilities of both patients and physicians must be carefully weighed. The potential for injustice exists when decisions become overly subjective, leading to possible inequities in resource allocation. Balancing the ethical principles of beneficence (acting in the patient’s best interest) and justice (fair distribution of resources) is essential but can be challenging, as these principles may occasionally conflict. To address these issues, members of the rehabilitation team, particularly physicians, must strive to minimize subjectivity in their decisions. Additionally, it is important to implement follow-up mechanisms for patients initially denied admission, ensuring that any changes in their condition are reevaluated. Medical and rehabilitation ethicists should prioritize the development of clear, evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and admission. These guidelines should be made accessible to the rehabilitation team to promote fairness, transparency, and consistency in decision-making, ultimately ensuring that resources are allocated equitably to those in need.

Keywords: Ethics, Equality, Rehabilitation services, Justice

Full-Text [PDF 372 kb] (293 Downloads)

Type of Study: Oral Presentation | Subject: Health Ethics Congress (11th) - Oral Presentation
Received: 2025/05/10 | Revised: 2026/01/12 | Accepted: 2024/12/22 | Published: 2024/12/22