Hoda Ahmari Tehran, Esmat Jafarbagloo, Nazanin Zia Sheikholeslami, Zahra Abedini, Azam Heidarpoor,
Volume 4, Issue 1 (12-2010)
Abstract
Surrogacy is considered as one of the selective methods for infertile women especially those who don't have womb. As this method is controversial and the sides should be analyzed both ethically and legally, the purpose of this study is to scrutinize the attitude of infertile women who visit Hazrat Masoumeh Infertility Centre in Qom for surrogacy.
This cross-sectional study conducted on 300 infertile women. The information were gathered from a two part questionnaire which in one part there was personal information and the other part was for phrases related to attitudes. The earned data were analyzed by descriptive test analysis and P<0.05 was considered significant.
The results showed that 61.3% of infertile women were in favor of surrogacy and 38.7% were against it. The highest priority in terms of attitude was the fear of an emotional relationship between the surrogate mother and the baby, and also the problems of delivering the baby from surrogate mother to the applicant couple. There was a logical statistical relation between the infertile women's attitude and age, educational level of the woman, educational level, the educational level of infertile women's partners, years of infertility and income of the bread winner( P<0.05).
As the attitude of vast majority of the study samples was positive and as it is important to know about opinions and preferences of families to make this action lawful, wider investigations in this field in more variable groups is recommended.
Hoda Ahmari Tehran, Ahmad Mashkoori, Tayebeh Ilaghinezad, Maryam Tajadini,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
Research shows that stress in medical students leads to burnout and a loss of respect for patients’ rights. These declines in mood and an increase in malpractice are particularly evident during the internship period. On the other hand, literature highlights the importance of reflective practice in education. This study investigates the effect of using student reflective narratives on observing dignity and respect for patients’ rights in clinical education. A mixed-methods study based on reflective learning theories (Gibbs' Reflective Model) was conducted over 12 months with 48 intern students. In a quasi-experimental design, 38 medical students were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. Only students in the intervention group were allowed to engage in conversations with patients and inquire whether they had properly respected the patients’ rights and dignity. The students then reflected on their performances. In the first week, a pretest was conducted in both groups. The intervention group received reflective education and participated in reflection writing during the second and third weeks. In the final week, a post-test was conducted for both groups. To explore students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of reflecting on their performance, a qualitative content analysis was carried out, including 12 semi-structured interviews and 144 reflection notes. The mean scores of students’ performance regarding respect for patients in the intervention group improved significantly in the post-test (12.32 ± 1.21) compared to the pretest (9.85 ± 1.39) (p < 0.05). An independent t-test indicated that the difference in post-test scores between the two groups was significant (p = 0.01). From the interviews, four main themes emerged: improving empathy and understanding patients’ feelings, paying attention to patients’ humanistic dimensions, respecting patients’ autonomy and rights, and promoting interpersonal communication skills. This study demonstrated the positive emotional effects of reflective narrative writing interventions on medical students in observing dignity and respecting patients' rights. It is recommended to incorporate reflective narratives into medical education programs to enhance these qualities.
