Search published articles


Showing 5 results for Akrami

Seyyed Mohammad Akrami, Amir Bastani, Zahra Osati,
Volume 3, Issue 4 (10-2010)
Abstract


Asghar Safari Fard, Saeed Rivandi, Seyyed Mohammd Akrami,
Volume 4, Issue 6 (12-2011)
Abstract

Despite advances in science and technology, human is not yet capable to produce a material or solution to compensate blood loss or act as blood this vital material of the body. Blood loss is only recovered through transfusion of blood prepared from donors.
Blood safety widely depends on the information obtained from voluntary blood donor. It is his/her ethical responsibility to provide valid information. On the other hand, some ethical issues about the donor and the recipients right should be considered. For this reason, the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), in 1980, in Montreal, approved the code of Ethics for Blood Transfusion. This code emphasizes on access to safe blood, free blood without need to be substituted, informed consent for blood transfusion, the right not to accept the blood and the right to be informed if they have been harmed. This article attempts to highlight some of the important points in blood transfusion medicine, and ethical aspects of blood transfusion according to the Islamic principles and Iran laws.


,
Volume 5, Issue 8 (3-2013)
Abstract


Haleh Habibi, Mehrandokht Nekavand, Seyed Mohammad Akrami,
Volume 9, Issue 5 (1-2017)
Abstract

Errors in health care services may cause irreversible harm in some cases. Medical errors are a threat to the welfare and health of the patient and their family and should be prevented. The majority of medical errors have little impact on human health, but some of them cause huge losses. This report describes a case of laboratory error in amniocentesis during pregnancy in which uncertain test result caused anxiety and lots of concern for the family. Inappropriate approach to medical error causes more errors to happen. Studies have shown that appropriate reporting and shift from traditional to systematic approach are important factors in reducing the frequency of medical errors.


Forouzan Akrami,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract

For many years, the question of whether or not to resuscitate periviable newborns has been a topic of debate among perinatologists, neonatologists, and ethicists. Unlike other studies that focus on the value and sanctity of human life during intrauterine development, the present study seeks to address the ethical question of what constitutes the right decision regarding life-support measures for newborns born at peri-viability ages, within the ethical norms of the Islamic tradition. This study assumes the inherent value of every moment of human life and acknowledges the human dignity of individuals from the time of conception. This multi-method study was conducted in three parts: (1) a review of the ethical frameworks presented for supporting the lives of periviable newborns, (2) an explanation of the principles of Islamic bioethics based on common Sunni and Shiite sources, and (3) the development of an Islamic bioethics framework. According to the ethical principles of the Islamic tradition—contrary to secular biomedical ethics—first and foremost, efforts should be made to preserve and prolong the life of periviable newborns regardless of their anticipated quality of life. Second, in decisions involving life and death, the priority is not the preferences of the infant's parents but rather the saving of the infant's life and its preservation by the physician and medical team. Nonetheless, parental participation in the decision-making process is essential. Preserving life, however, is not an absolute obligation; the aim of life-support measures is not merely to extend the infant's life for a short period but to do so in proportion to the prognosis and expected benefits. Specifically, these measures should be considered when there is a significant probability of the newborn’s survival. This requires a case-by-case assessment of risks, taking into account the newborn’s clinical condition, as well as regional resources and conditions. It is recommended to use the proposed Islamic bioethical framework to develop a clinical guideline that includes criteria for classifying infants born at the edge of viability based on their clinical condition. Ethical decisions to intervene should then be based on the infant's clinical state, probability of survival, and the resources available in the region.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb