Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Joodaki

Behzad Joodaki, Abolfath Khaleghi,
Volume 5, Issue 6 (25 2012)
Abstract

One of the important issues in the field of medical ethics is the patient's consent to treatment. This issue has also been addressed in the law, and Islamic legislators have clarified the conditions of gaining patient's consent and approached questions such as legitimacy of treatments or surgical operations, capacity of the person giving consent and so on. In medical ethics, there are different types of consent including expressed, implied and informed consent, while the Islamic Criminal Act concerns itself only with the expression of consent and it is unclear which type of consent the legislators are referring to. The importance of this issue lies in the fact that gaining the patient's consent without meeting the specified legal conditions causes liability for the physician. This article attempts to clarify the legal conditions for gaining patient's consent and at the same time answer questions such as whether the consent mentioned in the Islamic Criminal Act includes various types in medical ethics or not, how failure to meet the legal conditions for gaining consent should be penalized, what the liabilities are in the event that the patient's consent is not gained, and other questions related to the issue


Saeedeh Saeeditehrani, Pooneh Salari, Mansure Madani, Kobra Joodaki,
Volume 8, Issue 3 (9-2015)
Abstract

During their professional life, physicians may face demands for procedures that do not entail significant medical benefits for the applicants, but rather originate from cultural and common considerations of the society. In such cases, physicians are sometimes forced to ignore cultural concerns in order to fulfill their ethical and professional responsibilities and provide healthcare services based on patients’ interests and beneficence. This can create ethical challenges and lead to physicians’ inability to act on their patients’ requests. One case in point is the request for hymenorrhaphy.In this article, we aimed to discuss the different opinions, ethical considerations and legal issues concerning hymenorrhaphy, and to investigate the Islamic aspects of the problem. In view of all existing debates and considerations, it appears that the reconstruction of hymen is an ethical and professional measure in certain situations.


Behzad Joodaki, Mohsen Sadeghi, Keivan Ghani, Mohamad Mirzaie,
Volume 9, Issue 4 (10-2016)
Abstract

Physician-assisted suicide is an important, challenging issue in medical ethics, which the right to die is a central point in this issue. Physician-assisted suicide is offered to end intolerable pain and suffering. Although, it is a legal practice in some countries, still it is a challenging and controversial practice in ethical and legal perspectives. It has been argued that based on the principles of medical ethics, physicians should respect patient’s decision, however many ethicists and jurists believe that Physician-assisted suicide is unethical. It should be noted that the main reason for proponents and opponents is based on their interpretation about human dignity. This controversy can be resolved by reference to religious interpretation of human dignity in which asserts that Physician-assisted suicide is against human dignity and respect for human life.


Kobra Joodaki,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract

Women play a central role in human reproduction, with the continuation of the human race relying on their pregnancies. When women contribute to this vital social function for the survival of humankind, society has a moral obligation to safeguard their health. While healthcare interventions benefit the fetus, the fetus is entirely dependent on the mother, and any treatment must occur through her body. Consequently, the best strategy for improving fetal health lies in enhancing the care and support provided to pregnant women. The current state of population dynamics, associated challenges, and the introduction of general population policies led to the formulation and enactment of the "Supporting Families and Population Rejuvenation Law." This legislation aims to address many—though not all—of the challenges related to population growth and childbearing. The efforts to combat population aging and meet demographic needs are laudable, and the law includes several economic incentives to encourage childbearing. However, financial incentives alone are insufficient to address the complex reasons behind individuals' unwillingness to have children. Cultural, social, and political factors also play significant roles, and these are addressed to some extent within the law. Notably, specific provisions focus on supporting infertile couples, assisting pregnant women, and offering solutions to address illegal abortions. Regrettably, during the drafting of these provisions, the expert opinions of relevant scientific associations were overlooked. As a result, numerous ethical and scientific challenges have emerged in the implementation of the law, leading to deviations from its intended objectives. In particular, certain sections fail to adequately protect the fundamental rights of pregnant women. This article aims to analyze these challenges and propose solutions grounded in the principles of medical ethics.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb