Showing 2 results for KHodaparast
Fatemeh Doomanlo, Amirhosin Khodaparast,
Volume 6, Issue 1 (4-2013)
Abstract
Professionals who provide assisted reproductive technology (ART) services may be approached by patients who have no chance of success of treatment, or can even be harmed during the requested futile treatment. In such cases, what is the moral duty of those who provide treatment services, in particular the physicians? Does the mere request on the part of the patient free the doctor from his/her professional moral responsibilities? On the one hand, principles of individual autonomy and beneficence require the doctor to provide the patient with necessary treatments regardless of the results and consequences. On the other hand, the principle of non-maleficence requires the physician not to impose any harm on the patient. In addition, due to the limitation of resources, doctors are obliged to allocate them to those patients who have a better chance of recovery and use them in cases in which the probability of resource waste is low. However, does this sit well with the principle of justice, especially where the patient is willing to pay all the costs of his/her treatment? Whose interest does the doctor have to prioritize, the patient’s, that of the child resulting from ART, or the society’s? Given the above points, moral training of the team providing treatment services seems necessary so that they acquire the essential skills to make the right decisions in difficult situations such as those mentioned above.
Mohammad Rasekh, Amirhossein Khodaparast,
Volume 7, Issue 2 (7-2014)
Abstract
Reproduction is one of the basic abilities of human beings. This is often realized in a natural way, though in certain cases new methods and technologies provide infertile couples with the opportunity to realize their wish to have children. In recent years, the term “right to reproduction” has emerged, and sometimes emphasis is placed on the obligation of governments to satisfy this right. However, it seems that the ambiguity of the aforementioned term may create serious problems in our understanding of the subject matter and, in consequence, affect the manner in which it is handled in the society. In this paper, in addition to discussing the concept of rights, it is argued that the right to reproduction may be embodied both by a claim right and a liberty right, even though the latter is only a justifiable and acceptable way of representing the right to reproduction. Therefore, this right entails the freedom to bear children and to pursue provision of the requirements, including utilizing ART. As in the case of other human rights, this should be in balance and proportion with public interests, in such a way that in particular circumstances, such as problematic population situations, it may be protected or prevented by the government.
