Showing 5 results for Milanifar
Komeil Mirzaei, Alireza Milanifar, Fariba Asghari,
Volume 4, Issue 2 (4-2011)
Abstract
Decision making by a surrogate on behalf of incompetent patients is based on the ethical principle of "respect for autonomy". The increase in advanced health services has lead to more instances of decision making for incompetent patients receiving such services, and the treatment team usually asks a family member to serve for this purpose without being aware of the patient's preference. This study was conducted to assess patients' wishes and preferences regarding surrogate decision makers and determinants of such preferences.The study was cross-sectional, and samples were selected randomly from patients presenting at Farabi Eye Hospital clinics who were 18 years of age or older. Questionnaires were completed through interviews. Two hundred patients between 18 and 83 years old were interviewed. About 52% (n=105) were men, and 73% (n=77) were married. Among the married, the spouse was chosen as the surrogate decision maker in only 51% of cases. Among singles, boys preferred their father in 36% (n=9) of cases, while girls chose their father in 5.6% (n=1) of cases and the most frequent choice was other unmentioned people (33.3%, n=6). Most patients (93.5%) wished to be asked about their surrogate decision maker upon admission.Results of this study demonstrated that the people we usually consult for decisions concerning patient treatment are significantly different from patients' preferred surrogate decision makers. We suggest leaving the choice of surrogate decision maker to the patient while they are conscious.
Alireza Milanifar ,
Volume 4, Issue 3 (5-2011)
Abstract
Illnesses and their treatment, pharmacy and pharmacology, medical equipment, hygiene and health related topics, health economics, preventative measures, lab equipment and supplies, human resource service delivery models, education and training of health care professional, and associated areas of law are collectively referred to as the health care system. At times it is even difficult to separate health care from social injuries and civil conditions, since these can pose direct or indirect threats to individuals’ health. As health policy makers, managers and professionals demand and encourage the observance of ethical considerations in providing health care, neglect of the legal aspect of the health care system can bring about unethical phenomena that necessitate legal measures.
The present paper aimed to determine whether the general traditional legal classifications, that is, jurisdiction and sovereignty, apply to the health care system, and if so, which of the two it falls under. What further highlights the significance of answers to such questions is the fact that they are closely connected to regulations of the health care system.
It could well be that some companies in the health industry have a negative effect on the ethical conduct of physicians and other health care professionals, as due to their commercial nature and structure, these companies are dominated by rules of business, and this exerts limitations on their observance of ethical considerations.
This study investigated a number of such seemingly legitimate situations and the problems associated with them, hoping to eliminate legal conflicts and promote ethics in the process of providing health care in the society.
Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi, Alireza Milanifar, Zohre Behjati Ardakani, Mohammad Taghi Karrobi,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
The astonishing advances in medical sciences, owing to research in recent decades, have brought about endless advantages for humans, including improved level of health, prevention of communicable disease, and curative treatments. This trend, despite its great benefits, may undermine the principle of respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity, and expose certain risks to target populations or those excluded from investigations. Therefore, the principle of respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity has received attention by policy makers, law makers, human rights activists, and international organizations. It is necessary to cite the important question that arises here is there any contradiction between international documents' demands such as the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights and the legal actions of some countries on the principle and merits of Islamic teaching? If not, what type of activity should be undertaken by legislators in Islamic countries in general, and the Iranian Parliament in particular? An in-depth discussion of the issue reveals the fact that there is no contradiction between Islamic law and the principle of respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity. Therefore, there is room for the national legislative body to take legal actions in order to achieve the objectives of the principle of respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity in medical research and practice as articulated by international instruments such as the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights in particular.
Alireza Milanifar, Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi, Parvaneh Paykarzadeh, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (12-2011)
Abstract
Conflict of interest is a real situation in which a person as a decision maker simultaneously has two positions, one in private and the other in the public. In public role he or she has to pay attention to the society`s best interests and follows his or her best ones as private role. Conflict of interest is a common challenge of health system among both real and legal persons in all courses such as education, treatment, and researches.
The most causes of conflict of interest are named as deferent goals, lack of resources, authorities malfunction, health marketing and etc.
We aimed at discussing conflict of interest and its relation to law, its management, conflict of interest in pharmacy and pharmaceutical companies and also Iranian legal system viewpoint. In conclusion it seems that conflict of interest should be included in the law and the provisions to achieve the least conflict of interests in health system should be revised.
Mohammad Rasekh, Saeedreza Ghaffari, Alireza Milanifar, Farhad Yaghmaie, Faezeh Ameri, Shirin Boroomand,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract
Development of new methods of treatments for infertility has given rise to a serious question as to the access to such methods. Determination of the ones who can access the mentioned treatments and the limits of this access, depends to the definition of infertility. The Law of the method for Embryo Donation to Infertile Couples according to Iranian legislature considers the infertile couple who “cannot reproduce in accordance with credible medical certificate” as eligible to receive the donated embryo. However, applicants for modern infertility treatment methods have gone beyond infertile couples and include those couples who wish, based on credible medical evidence, to avoid having unhealthy children, especially by using donation methods or surrogacy. Accordingly, having supported a preventive approach to ARTs, a new concept of infertility will appear on the horizon. Expanding this concept to couples who are considered fertile from a common medical perspective but give birth to seriously unhealthy children shall inevitably lead us to revise the common legal concept of infertility. Therefore, by resorting to ethical reasoning, laws, and regulations of various legal systems and Fiqhi opinions we can develop another interpretation of Embryo Donation Law and argue for the access of the “perceived as infertile” couples to the infertility treatment with the help of third parties.
