Showing 12 results for Mobasher
Mina Mobasher, Nozar Nkhaee, Sareh Garoosi,
Volume 1, Issue 1 (7-2008)
Abstract
Background: The ethical climate (organizational culture) of an organization as perceived by a group of its workers is believed to affect ethical practices, job satisfaction and quality of care.
Objectives: To assess the ethical climate of teaching hospitals of Kerman city according to nursing staffs’ views.
Methods: A 26-items questionnaire was translated to Persian which its content validity was acceptable according to the literature review. Its reliability was in an acceptable range according to Cronbach’s alpha (0.92). It was distributed between a convenient sample of 350 nursing staff who worked in the four teaching hospitals of Kerman city. Three hundred and two subjects completed the inventory. All questionnaires were anonymous.
Results: The majority of them (76%) were female. The mean (±SD) age of the individuals were 32.4 (± 8.5). Subscription to the expression “always” was mostly seen for the item “my manager is someone I respect” and it was seldom observed for the item “nurses are supported and respected in this hospital”. There was no significant difference in the total score of the inventory according to background variables (i.e. age, sex, educational level, employment status and hospitals).
Conclusion: According to the great impact of organizational culture on nurses’ practices it seems that some aspects of organizational culture of teaching hospital especially the aspects that are related to physicians and top level managers need to be improved
Mina Mobasher,
Volume 1, Issue 4 (10-2008)
Abstract
Bagher Larijani, Mina Mobasher,
Volume 3, Issue 2 (4-2010)
Abstract
Mina Mobasher, Jamileh Mahdaviniya, Kazem Zendehdel,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
The Declaration of Helsinki, the most creditable ethical guideline for medical research on human subjects, has been updated 8 times since its establishment and the last revision was in 2008. Researchers, medical research subjects, authors, members of ethics committees, and editors of medical journals must be informed of the tenets of the Helsinki declaration in order to improve achievements of medical research and respect the rights of participants in medical research. In this study, the evolution of the Helsinki declaration is examined, and the provisions of the last version are compared with the previous version (2004). Finally, we made a practical interpretation of the last version, and discussed its differences from previous version. There are seven new paragraphs in the last version of the declaration. Four new paragraphs concern informed consent in areas of its being written and voluntary, renewed consent for using human materials, participants' right to revoke the consent, and exceptions from informed consent requirements. The other three new paragraphs focus on the research subjects’ right to being informed of the declarations' provisions, vulnerable groups gaining benefit from research, and registration of randomized clinical trials. It is important for researchers to recognize international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, because it enables them to use correct scientific and ethical standards in medical research. In the last version of the Helsinki Declaration more emphasis was placed on informed consent and vulnerable groups than previous versions.
Mina Mobasher, Paradis Sasani, Seyed Javid Al-E-Davood, Kiarash Aramesh, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
Although we have diverse methods in laboratory studies, such as cellular and molecular sciences, understanding many issues related to human health requires research on animals. An ethical duty of every researcher is to respect animal rights. In our country, educational and research activities are carried out frequently on animals. Therefore, guidelines for ethical use of animals in Iran were developed in 2004 after a review of international resources and considering the needs of researchers working with animals. This guideline was written in four sections, including animal transportation, facilities, animal care personnel, and research users. However, some studies show that researchers need comprehensive and easy to use instructions on the ethical use of laboratory animals. On the other hand, inadequate knowledge about ethics principles in research on laboratory animals have revealed the need to update guideline to be more practical, applicable, and in line with researchers' requirements. In this study, the above mentioned guideline was revised and completed in five parts, including transportation, facilities, animal care personnel, research users, and the use of animals in experimental procedures. In the first section, points on transport of animals and facilities, including location, cage, ventilation, humidity, light, temperature, noise, water and food are presented. The new revision, contains additional paragraphs, and some previous paragraphs are split. Another part of the findings is presented in terms of fundamental duties and ethical performance of persons who work in laboratory animals' houses and researchers working with animals. The final section of the findings is related to the use of animals in laboratory processes which are not presented in the previous formulation of the guideline, and includes basic ethical issues in regard to categorizing, anesthesia, surgery, and euthanasia. Therefore, the guideline was revised to be much more practical, more applicable, and should lead to some form of researchers' training in this field.
Mina Mobasher, Jamileh Mahdavinia, Kazem Zendehdel,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
The Declaration of Helsinki, the most creditable ethical guideline for medical research on human subjects, has been updated 8 times since its establishment and the last revision was in 2008. Researchers, medical research subjects, authors, members of ethics committees, and editors of medical journals must be informed of the tenets of the Helsinki declaration in order to improve achievements of medical research and respect the rights of participants in medical research. In this study, the evolution of the Helsinki declaration is examined, and the provisions of the last version are compared with the previous version (2004). Finally, we made a practical interpretation of the last version, and discussed its differences from previous version. There are seven new paragraphs in the last version of the declaration. Four new paragraphs concern informed consent in areas of its being written and voluntary, renewed consent for using human materials, participants' right to revoke the consent, and exceptions from informed consent requirements. The other three new paragraphs focus on the research subjects' right to being informed of the declarations' provisions, vulnerable groups gaining benefit from research, and registration of randomized clinical trials. It is important for researchers to recognize international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, because it enables them to use correct scientific and ethical standards in medical research. In the last version of the Helsinki Declaration more emphasis was placed on informed consent and vulnerable groups than previous versions.
Bagher Larijani, Mina Mobasher, Samaneh Tirgar, Farzaneh Zahedi, Soodeh Tirgar, Farideh Shariati, Banafsheh Karimi, Fatemeh Mirzaei (lotfi Azar),
Volume 7, Issue 5 (1-2015)
Abstract
It is universally acknowledged that death is a complex concept and different factors such as complicated philosophical ideas, contradictory descriptive approaches, and diversity in interpretations add to this complexity. Although a thorough understanding of the notion of death is important for everyone, this concept is of crucial importance to health care providers as they face enormous ethical challenges in the course of their careers. A few instances are controversial issues such as brain death, euthanasia and end-of-life care, where it seems essential to define a set of robust criteria for death. On the other hand, it can be argued that death is not a scientific concept and only different branches of medicine can provide a framework to clarify the subject of death. Therefore, it could be argued that theological approaches may shed some light on this concept. In this article, we aim to extract ontologic components of death mentioned in the Holy Quran, and will move on to propose a set of 12 criteria for death. This may help provide a clear understanding of the concept from the point of view of the Holy Quran, although more research is warranted to further illuminate this complex subject.
Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi, Seyed Mahmoud Tabatabaee, Narges Tabrizchi, Seyed Jamaleddin Sajjadi Jazi, Bagher Larijani, Seyed Mahdi Seyedi, Nasser Simforoosh, Maryam Khayamzadeh, Nazafarin Ghasemzadeh, Mina Mobasher,
Volume 16, Issue 0 (ویژه نامه کاربست طرح های دو گروه اخلاق و آموزش پزشکی 2023)
Abstract
Academic faculty members play the most influential role in realizing the goals and ideals of higher education and community health. In the contemporary period, the cultural and educational role of professors, in the most crucial mission of higher education, has not received the required and necessary attention, and neglecting it has resulted in irreparable damages and adverse consequences. This study attempted to identify the prominent cultural roles of professors in relation to students (with an emphasis on higher health education), while explaining the necessity and importance, and effective solutions were examined and proposed. The present study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method and a focus group discussion. Selected views of expert professors and data from authentic local scientific articles and related topics in upstream documents were utilized. The findings of the study were classified into five main themes and forty categories. “Cultural goals and ideals”; “general mission of professors for the cultural education of all students” and “special mission of professors of higher health education”; “authentic methods”; and “requirements for cultural education of students” were identified and recommended under the eight selected topics in each axis in order of priority. University Professors play a central role in the cultural and ideological education of students. It is appropriate to develop this responsibility in an objective manner and with suitable scientific methods and observe its excellence and realization in the education system.
Mojtaba Norouzi , Ali Akbar Haghdoost , Mina Mobasher,
Volume 16, Issue 1 (3-2023)
Abstract
Scientists now believe that precision medicine, which employs complicated technology and information derived from omics, can treat complex diseases and provide justice in health. Implementation of precision medicine will face new ethical challenges, considering the principles of medical ethics. With respect to philosophical principles, this study addressed the issue of justice and some ethical challenges of precision medicine. Because, in order to gain the benefits of precision medicine, a proper ethical framework must be developed while considering the challenges. The manner in which precision medicine information is shared and accessed can have an impact on people’s future careers, marriage choices, and type of health insurance. Furthermore, preserving people’s privacy and autonomy are important ethical concerns in precision medicine since there will be no perfect guarantee about data security and access. Although in the short and medium term, due to the design of studies and expensive and complex technologies, precision medicine will be limited to certain groups and will intensify the inequality in justice, in the long run, with the easy access and inexpensive cost of precision medicine technologies, the accumulation of medical expenses will decrease throughout life, and justice will be established between and within countries.
Mina Mobasher,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
As scientific output continues to grow and researchers strive to share their findings, the number of article retractions and cases of discreditation has also increased. Articles may be discredited for several reasons, including authors voluntarily admitting to errors in their work, discoveries of research misconduct, or concerns raised by reviewers or readers about the authenticity of the research. Retractions can harm public trust in science and have broader implications, such as damaging the reputation of the universities, research centers, and institutions associated with the retracted papers. This study considers the causes, contributing factors, and impacts of research discreditation, drawing on international guidelines and credible publications. It will examine the types of research misconduct and other issues that lead to article retractions. Additionally, the study will analyze cases of retracted articles authored by Iranian researchers using Retraction Watch. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) identifies eight key reasons for journal editors to retract published research. According to COPE guidelines, retraction may occur when there is clear evidence of issues such as data or image manipulation that invalidate the findings. Other grounds for retraction include plagiarism, duplicate submission or publication without proper disclosure or permissions, inadequate oversight during data collection, violations of regulations like copyright laws, unethical research practices, flawed peer review processes, and undisclosed conflicts of interest. Additionally, other studies have pointed out factors contributing to article retraction, such as the pressure on researchers to publish, a lack of essential skills to conduct valid and reliable research, and inadequate training in research ethics. In the context of Iranian author retractions, common issues include authorship manipulation and plagiarism. With the growth of research and scientific production in universities and research centers, it's becoming increasingly important to address the issue of article retractions. By understanding the underlying causes, we can develop effective guidelines and oversight strategies while also providing researchers with the necessary training to prevent such issues in the future.
Amin Arman, Mina Mobasher, Mohammad Aminizadeh,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Deciding on whether to continue life-prolonging treatments for terminal patients is a major challenge in healthcare. Advance directive emerges as a proposed solution to this issue in the world. The patients record their preferences regarding the continuation of life-prolonging treatments while they still are able to make decisions. Although advance directive is morally justifiable from the perspective of principlism, respecting the patient’s right to autonomy and assessing the benefits and drawbacks of providing such services, the religious beliefs of patients, their families, and healthcare providers always exert a significant influence on this matter. In Islam, preserving human life heavily affects these decisions. Several juridical and legal rules can culminate in different decisions on the continuation or termination of life-prolonging treatments including the absolute legal power of the owner to exercise dominion[1] or control over property and permission of intervention in their body[2], the rules of prohibition on causing the death[3], the sanctity of human killing[4], the rule of prohibition of detriment[5], the concept of unstable life[6] in Article 372 of the Islamic Penal Code and the rules of preventing losses[7], and the rule of sanctity of idle[8]. Nevertheless, given various types of will in Islamic Jurisprudence and according to the contract of agreement[9], it is possible to record the patient’s request regarding how to continue the treatment. This study indicated that implementing advance directives in Iran’s health system requires a more accurate analysis of moral, legal, and jurisprudential foundations.
(la¯ d.arar wa la¯ d.ira¯r fi¯ al-isla¯m)
(‘usr wa al-h. araj, al-)
. (la¯ d.arar wa la¯ d.ira¯r fi¯ al-isla¯m)
. (‘usr wa al-h. araj, al-)
Mina Mobasher,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
This Article has no Abstract.
