Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine

---

Confidentiality is one of the oldest principles of the medical profession that impacts on the relationship between physician and patient, the personal interests of patient and physician and consequently social welfare. While emphasizing the necessity of confidentiality, religious teachings consider disclosure of others' secrets a sin that deserves punishment thereafter. Nowadays, medical developments and the invention of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as well as the vastness of the informatics world make disclosure of patients' secrets easier than ever. This review article is the result of a descriptive study, and the information was collected using reliable library and internet resources. It will first expound the concepts and principles of confidentiality in medical ethics as well as Islamic ethics, and will then proceed to a comparative review of the similarities and differences in these two sets of­­­­ ethical views on the issue of confidentiality. In addition to the emphasis of medical ethics and Islamic ethics on the necessity of confidentiality in order to win public trust, both sets of teachings cover two areas of personal and public discretion, while in Islamic ethics, the issue extends to a third from, namely religious confidentiality. This makes Islamic ethics more comprehensive in the sense that based on Islamic teachings, the person who keeps someone's secret will also be rewarded in the Hereafter. Also, in medical ethics, only the behavior of the health staff is evaluated and their moods and motives are not taken into consideration, while Islamic ethics pays attention to human dispositions and therefore confidentiality is more stable and can maintain its efficiency without external supervision.

---

Moral dilemmas caused by modern diagnostic and therapeutic advances in medical science have increased the need to address medical ethics a hundredfold. Medical ethics is a "science", so the method needs scientific work. In order to achieve the objectives of any science, we need to define and resolve the ambiguities surrounding it. Notwithstanding the definitions presented in conjunction with the science of medical ethics, still some issues remain unclear about it.An important part of our knowledge consists of the answers to what things are, and that is nothing but definitions. Definitions comprise the bulk of our perceptions and therefore need to be employed.This review article is the result of a descriptive study. The data were collected through studying credible textbooks and searching internet resources and related articles. While emphasizing the need to clarify the definition of science and characteristics of logical definition, this paper evaluates some of the definitions of medical ethics and by showing their weak points, notes that there is a need for a logical definition of this science and the necessary consideration

---

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is an inherited primary immunodeficiency syndrome characterized by a profound deficiency in T-lymphocytes and variable defects in the B-lymphocyte number. The present study aimed to evaluate the ethical aspects of the clinical management of children with SCID. This report is based on the case of a 6-month-old male infant with SCID diagnosis presented during the Medical Ethics Grand Rounds in the Children's Medical Center in Tehran, Iran.

The patient had a positive history of recurrent infections and frequent hospitalization. His parents were consanguineous and came from a low socioeconomic level of the community. He was the fourth child of the family. The first and second children were healthy girls, while the third child was a boy with a history of numerous problems post vaccination who had eventually died of widespread infections. The physician had recommended bone marrow transplant, but the parents had been directed by a neighbor to visit a religious healer.

Timely management of severe combined immunodeficiency can reduce complications and improve the patients’ quality of life. The need for early screening tests is therefore ethically justified, although ethical issues surrounding the subject should not be overlooked. Instances of these issues include: neglecting the scientific criteria necessary to conduct the tests the economic burden imposed on the family of the child failure to provide sufficient information to parents and ignoring their consent to conduct testing and treatment lack of equitable access to diagnostic and treatment facilities and lack of attention to the child’s autonomy. It should, however, be noted that in certain cases, healthcare providers could perform their management activities with an ethical and supportive approach, taking into account all physical and psychological needs of infants with severe combined immunodeficiency, as well as those of their families