Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Nemati

Zahra Tazakori, Zahra Etebari Asl, Miss Zahra Mohammadi, Khatereh Nemati,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract

Moral sensitivity is one of the most important factors in improving the quality of nursing cares and nurses' performance. This research aimed to determine the relationship between moral sensitivity and self- efficacy in operating room nurses affiliated to educational- therapeutic centers in Ardabil University of medical sciences. This descriptive-correlation study was carried out on a sample of 144 nurses of operating room by census method in 2017. Data were collected by using moral sensitivity standard questionnaire and clinical performance self- efficacy. Data were analyzed using statistical tests: Pearson correlation coefficient, independent t- test and one way ANOVA by SPSS15 software. The mean of nurses' age was 30±6.07 years old. The majority of nurses were female (%54) and majority of them were in operating room discipline (%59). The mean and standard deviation of moral sensitivity score was 87±11.00 and the total self-efficacy was 129±13.00. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant statistical correlation between self-efficacy score and moral sensitivity of nurses (P<0.0001, r=0.882). The results of this study showed that moral sensitivity and self-efficiency of operating room nurses is high. Furthermore, it seems that high moral sensitivity increases self-efficacy. However, moral sensitivity and self-efficacy of nurses can be improved by holding ethical and professional workshops.

Sajjad Nemati, Dariush Rokh Afrooz, Nasrin Elahi, Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract

Evaluating clinical performance of nursing students as a resource to determine educational needs and decision-making is essential to change the educational environment and improve the quality of education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the professional behavior of nursing students in the clinical environment with the Small Scale Professional Assessment Tool (P-MEX). This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 86 nursing interns of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 2019. Data collection tools were demographic information questionnaire and P-MEX Cruess evaluation form. The validity and reliability of this instrument was evaluated by observers and was determined with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 76%. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 and descriptive statistics, independent t-test, analysis of variance, and post hoc test. In professional skills, most participants in the first stage were 51.2% at the average and expected level and 48.8% above the expected level, and in the second stage, most were 84.9% at the average and expected level and 15.1% higher than they were as expected. In this study, based on the evaluation scores in two stages, although the average total clinical skills scores of most students were within the expected range of the 4-point Likert scale, the skill scores were lower in the special wards. Therefore, for the full development of professional skills, it is necessary to develop appropriate methods of planning and training in the field of professional behaviors.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb