Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Nouri

Ali Ehsan Heidari, Hossein Keshavarz, Mohammad Nouri Sepehr,
Volume 5, Issue 5 (26 2012)
Abstract

Avicenna wrote many great books and articles such as Canon of Medicine which is his most important medical work. This study has been conducted in order to provide the necessary information on Avicenna's adherence to ethical principles and ethical norms in Canon. Three aspects including his medical practice, researches and philosophical attitude have been studied. Avicenna offers some valuable guidelines on the ethics in medicine in Canon. The first necessary condition for the practice of medicine is to comprehend medicine. Congruently, Avicenna emphasizes in his book that the doctor must be masterful. The use of scientific resources and valid information with citation to the references is one of the ethical subjects that are highlighted in this book. Avicenna has put much emphasis on ethical principles as a religious issue in medical practice. He believed in Islam and Islamic ethics and felt responsible toward God and his creations including humans Although in Canon there is no chapter specifically devoted to medical ethics, there are numerous ethical references that focus on humans as the main target of medical activities. It offers recommendations regarding ethical issues such as how to treat patients and minimize hazards. In brief, the book of Canon represents many humanistic ideas.


Amirmohammad Azarakhsh, Mohammadreza Dinmohammadi, Kian Nouroozi Tabrizi, Kowsar Nouri,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the publication of research articles, transforming the landscape of academic writing and dissemination. However, the integration of AI in this process presents significant ethical challenges that require careful consideration. This review study utilized a comprehensive search strategy, employing keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "publication ethics," "ethical challenges," "academic integrity," and "research dissemination" to identify relevant articles in scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The search included articles published between 2010 and 2024 in both English and Persian. Research articles, systematic reviews, and case reports that included the specified keywords in their titles and abstracts were selected. A total of 150 articles were screened, and 50 relevant studies were included for detailed analysis. The analysis identified several ethical challenges associated with the use of AI in academic publishing. Concerns regarding academic integrity are paramount, as AI-generated content can blur the lines between original research and automated writing, raising concerns about authorship and plagiarism. Furthermore, the reliance on AI tools for data analysis and manuscript preparation can raise questions about the accuracy and validity of research findings. additionally, the potential for bias embedded within AI algorithms is a significant concern, as it can influence the selection of research topics, the framing of research questions, and even the peer review process. The lack of transparency in AI-driven editorial processes can further undermine trust in academic publishing. This review underscores the urgent need for robust ethical frameworks and regulations to guide the responsible use of AI in academic publishing. Increased awareness and training among researchers and editors regarding the ethical implications of AI are crucial. Interdisciplinary collaborations are essential to address these challenges effectively and ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of academic research in the AI era.
 

Davood Rasouli, Elham Ramezanpour, Sohrab Nosrati, Akram Zhianifard, Zahra Nouri Khaneghah,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract

Professional ethics, as a critical aspect of medical ethics, holds significant importance in healthcare professions that directly involve human lives. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare adherence to professional ethics principles among operating room (OR) students and staff in selected teaching hospitals affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences during 2021–2022. This cross-sectional descriptive study included 200 OR staff from six hospitals (selected via stratified quota sampling) and 60 OR students (recruited via convenience sampling). Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and Kadushin’s Professional Ethics Questionnaire (2002) and analyzed in SPSS-24 using descriptive statistics (median and interquartile range) and inferential tests (Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests). Results indicated strong professional ethics in 98.4% of students and 75% of staff. Students scored significantly higher in loyalty and accountability (median score, P < 0.0001), while staff outperformed in honesty (median score, P = 0.003). No significant differences were observed in other dimensions. Overall, both groups demonstrated favorable professional ethics. These findings can guide educational interventions and developmental programs to further enhance professional ethics in these populations.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb