Showing 11 results for Rezaei
Ali Vasheghani Farahani, Majid Maleki, Reza Golpira, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Mojtaba Parsa, Mahnaz Mayel Afshar, Sima Kashanian Fard, Shiva Khaleghparast, Mohsen Rezaei, Seyed Ahmad Rezaei,
Volume 8, Issue 1 (5-2015)
Abstract
Medical professionalism has recently received attention in Iran, so we aimed to assess it in a single specialty educational hospital.In the present study, we evaluated observation of medical ethics principles from the viewpoints of physicians, nurses and patients. Eight principles of medical ethics were evaluated in these three groups through modified questionnaires containing 43 questions for physicians, 42 questions for nurses, and 25 questions for patients. The mean scores of those principles are as: enhancing professional efficiency (68.7 ± 23), confidentiality (67.9 ± 21), maintaining an appropriate relationship with the patients (61.7 ± 21), improving access to services (59.6 ± 21), distributing limited resources fairly (60.2 ± 25), knowledge production (61.4 ± 23), promotion of trust through management of conflicts of interests (64.8 ± 23), and perform professional responsibilities (59.6 ± 23). There were significant differences in the two parameters of “enhancing professional efficiency” and “confidentiality” between the viewpoints of the patients and the viewpoints of physicians and nurses (P < 0.0001). The difference in “maintaining an appropriate relationship with the patients”, “improving access to services”, and “distributing limited resources fairly” was significant between the viewpoints of the nurses and that of the patients and physicians. The viewpoints of the nurses and patients were significantly different only in “knowledge production”, “promotion of trust through management of conflicts of interest”, and “perform professional responsibilities” (P < 0.0001). With respect to these significant differences, the nurses’ viewpoint regarding “enhancing professional efficiency” may be more dependable due to their more accurate knowledge of the physicians’ performance and more extensive contact with them. This has also resulted in significant differences between nurses and patients or physicians in other principles as well.
Mohsen Rezaei Aderyani, Saeid Nazari Tavakkoli, Mehrzad Kiani, Mahmood Abbasi, Mohsen Javadi,
Volume 10, Issue 0 (3-2017)
Abstract
Medical ethics is an old science. Some of its issues have historical precedence, and others are modern challenges, and have emerged with advances in technology. One of such historic but newly emerging challenges is "bi’natijeghi-e-pezeshki (futile treatment)", which is defined as the treatment that cannot achieve its goal. This term entered medical literature as "medical futility" in late 1980s. Based on this investigation, it can be concluded that this term should only be used when the desired outcome following medical procedure and the outcome sought by the medical team and patient/family (patient's health) is unlikely to be realized. There are various equivalents for this term in our country (Islamic Republic of Iran), including "bi’fayedegi-e-pezeshki (medical uselessness)", "bi’houdeghi (frivolity) in medicine", and even "inappropriate treatment". The present article aimed to find a suitable Persian equivalent for this concept. The use of interpretations such as "frivolity" or "uselessness" may cause misunderstanding between patient/family and the medical team, and can ruin the trust between patient/family and the medical team. Thus, the best alternative to this English term appears to be "bi’natijeghi-e-pezeshki (futile treatment)".
Saeid Nazari Tavakkoli, Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili , Omidvar Rezaei Mirghaed , Saeedeh Nateghinia,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
A study on the adaptability of the patient's admission process with ethical standards has a significant role in reducing the misconduct of the medical staff and increasing the satisfaction of patients. Hence, by the study of the patient's admission process in the Neurosurgery ICU and the identification of its personnel faults; we are going to provide a platform for excellent service to patients. This study is a qualitative study. It had done with the In-depth interviewing with 28 staff of the Neurosurgery ICU of Loghman Hospital during the winter of 1396 (December2017- March 2018). The data is collected and analyzed with triple coding: open, selective, and axial. "The lack of ethical sensitivity to nursing profession and its importance" is a general tag for seven categories of functional status of ICU staff: the use of staff with insufficient professional competence, the impact of staff tastes in professional relationships, irrational expectations, lack of communication skills, the inability to admission new patients and work in other health centers. Accordingly, "the lack of moral sensitivity to the profession and its importance" in the ICU staff is a central phenomenon that results from neglect of the importance of developing transparent processes for various activities in the ICU, as well as the lack of professional training. This will make the ICU staff ignore the implementation of the defined standards, and subsequently the decline in the quality of health care services in ICU.
Samira Rezaei, Mehrnoosh Pazargadi, Mohammad Mehdi Salaree,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
The health system needs nursing managers with moral reasoning ability to increase the quality of care in the system by adopting an effective leadership style. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between moral reasoning ability and leadership style of nursing managers of medical centers affiliated to Jiroft University of Medical Sciences. The present study was a descriptive- correlation cross-sectional study that was conducted in 2020. The population of study was all employed nursing managers, among whom 124 participants with a bachelor's degree in nursing and higher were included in the study by census sampling method. Data collection tools were demographic questionnaires, “Cherisham moral reasoning” and “Hershey and Blanchard leadership style”. Descriptive and inferential statistics and SPSS software version 19 were used to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that the mean score of moral reasoning of nursing managers is (48.10 ±7.04) which is higher than the mean score of the test. Also, the dominant leadership style of managers was selling leadership style 59.68%. The highest average of ethical reasoning of nursing managers was related to participating leadership style (48.44±7.35). There was no significant relationship between moral reasoning ability and leadership style of nursing managers (P >0.05). According to the results of the study, it is recommended to strengthen nursing managers 'efforts to strengthen transformational leadership styles in their managerial behaviors in order to improve leadership effectiveness and increase nurses' job satisfaction and observe ethical decision making.
Jamal Rezaei Orimi, Shahrbanoo Asadi,
Volume 15, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Abstract
The Safavid period is considered one of the most important periods in the history of Iranian medicine. During this period, medical knowledge was developed many works in the field of medicine were written and several hospitals were established. In recent years, several studies have been conducted on the medical history of the Safavid period. The purpose of this study is to introduce and critique the paper "Medicine of the Safavid era relying on Western travelogues" by Saeed Agharezaei and Shiva Rezaei. This research is an analytical-critical study that uses library resources to review and evaluate the paper in terms of structure, content, and method. The paper has coherent writing and indicates the authors' efforts to explain the medical and health situation of the Safavid period from the perspective of Western tourists. In the structure of the paper, sometimes inappropriate references and writing errors are seen. Failure to mention the reasons for the migration of physicians to India, failure to determine the true location of hospitals, failure to mention the position of dental, veterinary and surgical knowledge, failure to mention epidemics and ambiguity of the pharmacology situation in the Safavid period can be enumerated content critiques. The results show that the paper, despite attempts to reveal various aspects of medicine in the Safavid era, has some structural, content, and method problems. Therefore, it is expected that the respected authors, by eliminating the mentioned problems, will be able to publish a more significant work on the history of medicine in future research.
Aliyeh Jahanian, Amir Aghayali, Jamal Rezaei Orimi,
Volume 16, Issue 1 (3-2023)
Abstract
Quarantine has a long history in Iran. The spread of epidemic diseases led to the creation of quarantine establishments in Iran. During the Qajar period, quarantine was taken into consideration, and at the end of the 19th century, quarantine establishments were developed in the borders of Iran. Accordingly, in recent years, much research has been conducted on quarantine. The present study aimed to introduce and criticize the paper entitled, “Quarantines of Iran in the End of Ghajar and the Beginning of Pahlavi Era” by Kasiri and Dehghannejad. This analytical-critical study was conducted using library resources to introduce and evaluate the aforementioned paper. The text of the article is coherent and integrated and indicates the authors’ efforts to identify the problems and obstacles to implementing quarantine in Iran. Concerning the structure of the article, there are instances of inappropriate referencing, writing errors, and ambiguity in the scope and limits. Moreover, the failure to mention the effects of World War I on the severity of communicable diseases and quarantine and the vagueness of the prevalence of infectious diseases can be among the criticisms of the content and methodology. Although the abovementioned paper could present a new approach to the history of Quarantine in Iran in the Qajar and Pahlavi eras for the scholars of the history of medicine, it suffers from several structural, content, and methodological flaws. Therefore, given the importance of criticism in scientific studies and according to the analysis of this paper, the results could help enhance the quality of studies and scientific productions in this field.
Nafiseh Rezaei, Rasha Atlasi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics encompasses principles and standards guiding the design and application of AI, ensuring privacy, security, and fairness. This study aims to conduct a scientometric analysis of research in this field, identifying key features and emerging trends. A search was conducted in the PubMed database using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "artificial intelligence" and "ethics." All indexed documents from inception to September 1, 2024, were retrieved and analyzed. Scientometric analysis and data visualization were performed using R, with results presented through tables, graphs, and scientific maps. A total of 534 papers were published in this domain from 1986 to 2024, with the highest number (n=70) in 2024. The American Journal of Bioethics had the most publications (n=30), and Melissa D. McCradden (University of Toronto) was the most prolific author with five articles. The University of Oxford (n=24) and Stanford University School of Medicine (n=21) were the leading institutions in this field. The most active countries were the USA (n=236), Germany (n=91), and France (n=52). In 2024, the top trending topics included "research personnel," "informed consent/ethics," and "artificial intelligence/ethics/trends," while in 2023, "privacy," "biomedical research," and "medical education" were predominant. The field of AI ethics has seen exponential growth in scientific output, paralleling the rapid advancements in AI applications across disciplines and daily life. Addressing ethical concerns and fostering international research collaboration will be essential for maximizing benefits while mitigating challenges in this evolving domain.
Mohsen Rezaei Adaryani,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
The relationship between healthcare providers and patients is often marred by financial issues, which present significant ethical challenges. These financial interactions can be categorized into direct and indirect communications, both of which give rise to various ethical dilemmas. In direct financial communication, issues such as under-the-table payments, fee splitting, self-referral, inappropriate referrals, induced demand, and unnecessary surgeries or hospitalizations are prevalent. These practices compromise the ethical standards of medical care. On the other hand, indirect financial communication occurs when a small portion of the healthcare cost is paid by the patient, while the majority is covered by intermediary institutions like insurance companies or the Ministry of Health. The family physician system, with accurate patient referrals and cost management, supports this model. Under such a system, service tariffs align with actual costs, creating "real" tariffs, and reducing opportunities for many ethical challenges to arise. The current health system provides practical examples of the disconnection of financial relationships, notably through policies such as the Accident Insurance Law (Article 92 of the Fourth Development Plan) and the family physician system within the Imam’s Relief Committee. Health centers involved in treating injured patients and staffed with experienced personnel have observed and reported significant improvements following the implementation of the Accident Insurance Law, highlighting the positive impact of financial disconnection on healthcare ethics. This study demonstrates that cutting financial ties between doctors and patients, through indirect financial communication models and accurate referral systems, is an effective solution to addressing a wide range of ethical challenges in healthcare.
Jamal Rezaei Orimi, Sina Moradi Mansour,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
This Article has no Abstract.
Zahra Aghabeiglooei, Roshanak Saghebi, Jamal Rezaei Orimi, Morteza Mojahedi,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract
The history of medicine during the Safavid period (907-1135 AH) in Iran, as one of the important periods, has always been the focus of researchers. The main objective of this study was to conduct a quantitative evaluation of articles related to the “history of medicine in the Safavid period” in Iran. This descriptive-analytical, applied study was conducted using a quantitative approach. The statistical population of the study comprised all scientific productions on the history of medicine in the Safavid period indexed in domestic and international scientific databases over 22 years, from 2001 to March 2024. During the period under review, a total of 247 articles in the field of the history of medicine in the Safavid period were published with the participation of 542 authors. In terms of thematic orientation, 18.2% of the published works were on the biographies of physicians, while research, translation, and editing of medical manuscripts ranked next with 16.1%. Among universities and scientific centers, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Islamic Azad University ranked first. Male participation accounted for approximately 60%, exceeding that of female authors, and about 68% of the works were the result of collaborative research. The Journal of Islamic and Iranian Traditional Medicine published the highest number of articles. The most common type of publication was original research articles. Content analysis showed that, despite significant growth in this research field, an excessive concentration on specific topics, such as physicians’ biographies, has limited scholarly attention to other dimensions of medical history in this period, highlighting the need for broader and more balanced research perspectives.
Zahra Aghabeiglooei, Jamal Rezaei Orimi, Seyed Mohammad Hashemimehr, Roshanak Saghebi, Morteza Mojahedi, Seyyed Amir Hosein Latifi, Mehdi Salehi, Seyed Abdollah Mahmood,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract
Evaluating and analyzing scientific productions play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of research and effectively managing research resources. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the content of theses in the field of the history of medical sciences in Iranian universities from 2013 to 2022. This applied study was conducted using the quantitative content analysis method. The findings revealed that the highest number of theses were completed in 2022 (19.2%), with topics related to traditional medicine and traditional pharmacy being the most prevalent. Descriptive and descriptive-analytical studies were the most common research methods. Moreover, the most frequent keywords included “Medical History”, “Traditional Medicine”, and “Iranian Medicine” and their Persian equivalents. Regarding historical periods, the Islamic period (from the emergence of Islam to the early Safavid era) accounted for the highest number of theses, while the contemporary period had the lowest. The results indicated a research focus on traditional medicine and the Islamic period, highlighting the need for further exploration of other historical periods and the use of qualitative methods to deepen understanding of historical complexities.
