Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Yavari

Neda Yavari, Alireza Parsapoor,
Volume 10, Issue 0 (3-2017)
Abstract

Increasing attention to individual liberties in last decades, has led to considering respect to patients autonomy and involvement in making medical decisions as a critical ethical principle. In spite of a general emphasis on the Importance of the mentioned principle, there is a wide controversy about the logical limitations of respect to patients' wishes and preferences in medical decision making. While a significant number of theoreticians believe in necessity of considering rigid limitations for respect to patients' autonomy, others emphasize on respect to patients' absolute and unconditional right of self-determination. This article explains and analyzes each group's main arguments and finally suggests a functional and logical approach to the principle. This method helps avoidance of disadvantages of unconditional respect to patients' preferences while considering autonomy as an important ethical maxim.
Morad Momivand, Arash Ghodousi, Neda Yavari,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract

Professional nurse should be familiar with the principles of biomedical ethics and how to deal with situations of moral conflict. Nurses encounter a variety of ethical conflicts in their work environments, which, if not properly educated for that, may be destructive. One of the first steps to recognize and help resolve moral conflicts seems to be a better understanding of the underlying causes of these conflicts. For this purpose, this study compared the exposure of pre-hospital emergency staff and nurses of the ophthalmologic departments in Isfahan with ethical conflicts in their careers. This descriptive-analytic study was performed on 44 pre-hospital emergency personnel and 42 nurses in ophthalmic and postgraduate degrees. Data were collected using Falco's moral conflict questionnaire. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution tables, dispersion indexes, and mean and analytical statistics such as T test and ANOVA. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 8. The results of this study showed that the prevalence of ethical conflicts among pre-hospital emergency personnel with a mean of 61.65 was higher than nurses in ophthalmic departments with an average of 40.23. Therefore, according to the results of this study, the degree of exposure to ethical conflict situations for pre-hospital emergency personnel more common in comparison with the staff of the elective hospital units in more stressful situations. The degree of exposure to ethical conflict situations is also more significant for pre-hospital emergency personnel than nurses in the ophthalmic departments.

Mohammad Hossein Eftekhari, Alireza Parsapour, Ayat Ahmadi, Bagher Larijani, Neda Yavari, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki,
Volume 16, Issue 0 (ویژه نامه کاربست طرح های دو گروه اخلاق و آموزش پزشکی 2023)
Abstract

Defensive medicine is performing actions that have no medical indication and benefit for the patient (positive defensive medicine) or refraining from performing risky actions that have a medical indication and benefit for the patient (negative defensive medicine). These actions are carried out by the physicians with the sole motive of protecting themselves against complaints or tensions such as the protest of the patient or colleagues and usually cause physical, psychological, or economic harm to the patient or the institution that pays the treatment fee, such as insurance organizations. It can have consequences in terms of the quality of care and the efficient use of limited health resources. Factors such as the physician’s concerns about lawsuits and proceedings may lead to defensive behaviors. This study presented suggestions for the management and prevention of such behaviors, including three main categories related to the strategies for the reformation of the patient complaint handling system, social strategies for the management and prevention of defensive medicine, and managerial-organizational strategies. These strategies are based on the findings of a mixed-methods research including an unsystematic review of resources and a qualitative study conducted using semi-structured interviews. The results have been discussed by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Iran.

Neda Yavari ,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract

Communicating the truth about a terminally ill patient’s diagnosis and prognosis is a profound ethical challenge in healthcare. While patients have the right to know the details of their medical condition, grounded in the ethical principle of autonomy, healthcare providers often grapple with concerns about causing distress or hopelessness. These concerns sometimes lead to paternalistic approaches where information is either manipulated or withheld from patients in end-of-life stages. Research on the timing, method, and extent of information sharing with terminally ill patients has yet to reach a consensus. The challenge is further complicated by cultural differences regarding death, as well as varying family and social dynamics. This article explores the views and experiences of both healthcare providers and patients regarding the ethical challenges associated with truth-telling in end-of-life care. This qualitative study involved semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 27 healthcare providers, 20 patients, and 15 caregivers. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. The findings were organized into four key themes:
1.Diverse methods of truth-telling employed by healthcare providers, influenced by personal values, institutional policies, and cultural contexts.
2.Patients’ and families’ preferences for receiving information, which frequently conflicted with healthcare providers’ practices.
3.The impact of timing, manner, and setting of truth-telling on the emotional health of both patients and their families.
4.The necessity for a patient-centered approach that acknowledges the unique circumstances, values, and preferences of patients and their families.
This research highlights the ethical complexities involved in truth-telling for terminally ill patients. While respecting patient autonomy is fundamental, the manner and timing of delivering the truth are crucial to maintaining trust in the physician-patient relationship and safeguarding the patient’s mental health. Further research should focus on developing effective communication strategies and support systems for healthcare providers engaged in end-of-life care. Educational programs should prioritize improving communication skills, cultural sensitivity, and ethical decision-making to enhance best practices and alleviate the emotional challenges faced by healthcare professionals in this sensitive area.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb