Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine

---

The most important element in physician-patient relationship is trust which has a major effect on treatment and satisfaction of both patient and physician. To be able to realize the trust between patients and physicians, at first we should find an appropriate definition of trust so in this article we study the criteria of trust and it's realization to be adapted between patient and physician.We reviewed the literatures investigating the perspective of scientists of sociology and ethics. Afterwards the issue was discussed in focus groups, and the contents were analyzed to reach to a proposed model including several criteria.We believe that trust has two sides, the trust (patients) and the trustee (physicians) and for trust fulfillment both sides should be involved. So some criteria are related to the individual patients, such as patient's needs and desire to trust. Some are related to patients and are considered as respect to patients, awareness of physicians characters, such as his/her knowledge and experiences of physician.The other two criteria are related to physician's characteristics, such as his/her commitment and appearance, and physician-patient relationship, such as communication skills of physician.

---

Trust is an important factor in the relationship between physician and patient. Trust between physician and patient is an important factor in improving patient and physician satisfaction, but it will not materialize unless we define trust and its criteria. Since trust fulfillment is dependent on its criteria, in this study we tried to define these criteria. First, we explicated the meaning and concept of trust through review articles, then we proceeded to content analysis, and lastly, the logical conclusion was obtained. In this article we have expressed scientific opinions and extracted 23 components from the cited opinions. We concluded that trust can be analyzed from three perspectives: the perspective of patients with 5 criteria, the physicians' view with 2 criteria and the perspective of an observer of the physician-patient relationship with 9 criteria.

---

In the past decades, the need for organ donation has increased while consent rate continues to remain inadequate. One of the most important limiting factors in organ donation is families’ refusal to grant consent, and therefore it is important to determine the circumstances influencing the phenomenon. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting consent to organ donation in families of brain death patients in hospitals affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. For this purpose, a self-made questionnaire was distributed among 54 family members of brain death patients admitted in hospitals affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences between 2003 and 2013. The data were reported as mean, frequency and percentage using the SPSS16 software. The average age of the deceased was 31.38 ± 13.72 years, and car accidents were the most frequent cause of brain death (59.3%) in this study. In addition, 72.2% of the deceased were male and 90.7% of them lived in or around the city of Shahrekord. About 37% of the families consented to organ donation. The average age of the family members who participated in the study was 42.15 ± 8.9 years. The most frequent reasons affecting families’ consent to organ donation were religious rewards (100%), confidence in the medical team and staff (100%), and confidence in physician diagnosis (100%).The findings of the study show that religion, faith and family ties affect the willingness for organ donation, and therefore specific attention should be given to these factors in educational programs. In the present study, religious beliefs and confidence in the performance of health care workers were highlighted as the most effective factors in consent to organ donation in brain dead patients' families. Consequently, in order to increase organ donation rate, special attention to these factors and proper planning is necessary.