Showing 36 results for Mohammadi
Mahmoud Motavassel Arani, Mohammad Hassan Alamolhoda, Nikzad Easazade, Gholamreza Noormohammadi,
Volume 10, Issue 0 (3-2017)
Abstract
Modern medical ethics, in particular the principle of Non-Maleficent, advises the medical staff to avoid any harm to the patient. Islamic jurists, using religious texts and sources, have introduced rules that are applicable in many areas of life. Among these rules, is the rule Non-Harm, that in this article to review this rule and its applications in medicine. In addition to discussions of the documents, a better understanding of the words "Darar" and "Dirar" and deny or forbid the word "La" at the beginning of the base document, is one of the major issues and disputes. Organ transplants, family planning and birth control, responsibility to protect the health, need to see a doctor for treatment, civil responsibility for doctors in the treatment, responsibility for custodians of society for the control of AIDS, are the problems affecting today's health systems that the rule of No Harm is flowing in them.
Reza Mohammadi Nasab, Abdorasol Emadi, Seyyed Mohammad Rahim Rabbanizadeh,
Volume 10, Issue 0 (3-2017)
Abstract
Writing treatise on Islah al-Adwiat (Reducing the Side-Effects of Drugs) is one of the most important issues in Islamic medicine. During the first few centuries of Islamic civilization, four important treatises were written on this subject, which established the scientific tradition that formed the bases of the subsequent pharmacological formation. This paper addresses the tradition of writing books on reducing the side-effects of purgatives and it also critically edits and translates the books written by three prominent scholars – Hubaysh b. Atham of Damascus, Qusta b. Luqa of Balbak and Muhammad Zakaria Razi – relying on the surviving manuscripts. The research objective followed by this paper is examining and analyzing the purgatives as an important class in the pharmacological and medical books of the Islamic era.
Almost all books on medicine and pharmacology written in the old medical tradition have a section or a chapter devoted to the detailed introduction of purgatives and counteracting their side effects. Examining these bits, one may trace the main structure of the tradition, which continued for many centuries. Besides, comparing them may provide an appropriate perspective to look at the history of pharmacology. To this end, images of the material included in those books were obtained from libraries and museums, which have housed such books for almost a millennium. Then they were analyzed along with translating and editing.
It may be concluded that pharmacologists belonging to the old medical paradigm would use drugs to treat conditions of bad health caused by changes in the patient’s humors; the drugs, however, would cause some side-effects along with removing humors and residues, leading to a change in the main humor of the body. The pharmacologists; therefore, introduced the drugs, their harms, as well as the best type of the drug to be used and finally suggested some methods in detail to reduce their side effects
Zahra Tazakori, Zahra Etebari Asl, Miss Zahra Mohammadi, Khatereh Nemati,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract
Moral sensitivity is one of the most important factors in improving the quality of nursing cares and nurses' performance. This research aimed to determine the relationship between moral sensitivity and self- efficacy in operating room nurses affiliated to educational- therapeutic centers in Ardabil University of medical sciences. This descriptive-correlation study was carried out on a sample of 144 nurses of operating room by census method in 2017. Data were collected by using moral sensitivity standard questionnaire and clinical performance self- efficacy. Data were analyzed using statistical tests: Pearson correlation coefficient, independent t- test and one way ANOVA by SPSS15 software. The mean of nurses' age was 30±6.07 years old. The majority of nurses were female (%54) and majority of them were in operating room discipline (%59). The mean and standard deviation of moral sensitivity score was 87±11.00 and the total self-efficacy was 129±13.00. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant statistical correlation between self-efficacy score and moral sensitivity of nurses (P<0.0001, r=0.882). The results of this study showed that moral sensitivity and self-efficiency of operating room nurses is high. Furthermore, it seems that high moral sensitivity increases self-efficacy. However, moral sensitivity and self-efficacy of nurses can be improved by holding ethical and professional workshops.
Sina Valiee, Shiva Mohammadi, Shaeib Dehghani, Farzaneh Khanpour,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Nowadays, transplantation is the final treatment for the patients with end-stage organ dysfunction. Considering the importance of the organ donation and the important role of teachers in raising the knowledge and attitude of a large group of people, the present study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the attitudes of the teachers in Sanandaj regarding organ donation. This study was a descriptive-analytic (cross-sectional). A total of 250 teachers working in the first and second level of high school in Sanandaj city were selected by cluster sampling method in the academic year 2017-2018 and completed the questionnaire on knowledge and attitude towards organ donation. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 20, independent t-test and ANOVA. The findings of this study showed that 152 (60.8%) had moderate knowledge and 92 (36.8%) had high knowledge about organ donation. 166 teachers (66.4%) had moderate attitude and 81 teachers (32.4%) had high attitude toward it. 90.8% of teachers lacked donation cards, while 144 (57.6%) were inclined to receive a donation card. According to the results, the knowledge and attitude of the majority of teachers were moderate and most of them did not have a donation card. Considering the importance of this effective group in raising the culture and knowledge of students and their families in the community toward organ donation, education and preparing appropriate background for receiving, raising knowledge, and attitudes toward organ donation for the teachers are required.
Sedigheh Ebrahimi, Reza Mohammadi, Seyed Ziaedin Tabei,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
The white coat ceremonies are a recent phenomenon in medical education at the first steps of their education, that use as a symbol to impress upon medical students the importance of professionalism in medicine. This ceremony is known as one of the primary preparations for entrance of medical students to clinical courses. This study aims to investigate the effect of white coat ceremonies on professional ethics and student familiarity with their professional tasks in clinical departments. The present study is a qualitative study on the students' viewpoints regarding white coat ceremony and based on goal-based sampling. The statistical population included 4th-year medical students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 1394. Data collection was done by a mixed method which one part of it was the half structural interview and another part by answering the open questions. Data collection continued to the saturation phase, furthermore; the data were analyzed by content analysis method according to the instructions. Most of the participants in this study considered holding a ceremony before entering the hospital as an important event for the readiness of students to go through a clinical course. The most important positive effects of white coat ceremony were increased students' commitment and accountability, improved interactions with patients, increased motivation and self-confidence, and familiarity with some of the basic principles of professional ethics. A white coat celebration can enhance the students' familiarity with their professional duties and motivations. More studies are needed to better understand the strengths, weaknesses, and shortcomings of this ritual.
Mehri Seyedjavadi, Raheleh Mohammadi, Arezo Mirzayee, Maryam Mirzayee,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Nursing ethics is one of the most basic aspects of nursing profession, which nurses are required to follow the principles receiving nursing care with confidence by patients. This study was conducted to determine the level of moral development of nurses and its contributing factors. This descriptive, analytic study was performed in 2017, study samples were 310 nurses working in educational hospitals of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. Samples were selected by convenience method. The data was collected using a Kohlberg’s nursing dilemma test. The questionnaire included six scenarios: newborn with anomalies, forcing medication, adult's request to die, new nurse's orientation, medication error, and uninformed terminally ill adult. The data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 18 using descriptive and analytic tests. In this study, 51 nurses (16.45%) were in the pre-conventional level, 101 nurses (32.58%) in the conventional level, 132 nurses (42.58%) at the post-normal level and 26 nurses (8.38%) at the level of clinical considerations. Moral thinking mean score was 42.58 ± 5.6 and the mean score of the clinical considerations was 21.53 ± 4.3. The present study showed that the majority of nurses are in the post conventional and conventional level; but this is less than 50% of all nurses, which shows that the level of moral development of nurses is in the moderate level. It requires further investigation of the causes and related factors and more efforts for improving it.
Ali Mohammadi ,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Scientific research as well as a lot of social and individual effects for human beings has caused many moral problems. The prospect of children building through somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or human cloning has caused widespread moral concerns around the world. Accordingly, various reports and regulations have been published at the national and international levels that address the ethical principles for research involving human subjects. In this regard, the Belmont report is of particular importance, in which three fundamental principles of human research have been taken into consideration. These three principles are: the principle of "Respect for Persons", the principle of "Beneficence" and the principle of "justice". In the field of this new biotechnology, namely, human cloning with respect to the use of human subjects in it and according to the ethical principles for research involving human subjects, there are three types of discussion: problems of Safety; a particular problem in the field of business Satisfaction and the problem of the exploitation of women. Considering that about 90% of cloning efforts in animals have been encountered with many problems such as abortion, early death, the development of certain diseases and physical defects, etc., it is not wise to use it in humans and it causes certain and unpredictable problems in cloned people.
Farhad Rashnopour, Nasrollah Pourmohammadi Amlashi ,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
Jundishapur was built during the Sassanid Shapur era to house Roman prisoners, and a scientific school, especially in the field of medicine was established there. Jundishapur's urban and scientific identity are intertwined with three concepts of Medical knowledge, Syriac, and Christian Christianity. In this research, the establishment of the Nestorian dynasty in Jundishapur, as well as the distinguished position of these physicians in the flourishing of Islamic civilization, has been studied and recognized. Therefore, this issue will be explained and highlighted by analytical descriptive method and relying on library resources. After the rise of Islam and the conquest of Iran, the medical elites of Syriac and Nestorian Jundishapuri; in particular, the Bakhtishoo, Masouyeh, and Maserjuyeh families continued to incorporate the medical traditions of various nations and the translation of Greek medical texts into other languages at Jundishapur Hospital. With the employment of prominent people of these dynasties in the Abbasid Caliphate of Baghdad, human resources, academic, and clinical achievements and the results of centuries of experience of Jundishapur Hospital Medical Center in compiling and translating medical texts have transferred to Islamic civilization by them.
Khadije Mohammadi, Abbas Rahimi Froshani,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
One of the main issues in hospitals is evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness. For this purpose, several indicators are presented, which are known as functional indicators. If the performance of hospitals depends on the patient's demographic characteristics, overlooking effect of hospital indicators, as an effective factor at a higher level on the patient rights, may lead to inaccurate conclusions about these relationships. In such cases, where the data are intrinsically multilevel, the use of multi-level statistical models for this type of data is useful. Samples were collected from eight hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences during 2013 in a two stage cluster. Data on patient rights and demographic information were collected from 375 patients by a questionnaire. The patient's rights rate was measured by multivariate statistical analysis and factor analysis. Two-level linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between patients' rights and some demographic information. The first level was demographic factors and the second level was hospital factors. The results showed that rate of considering patients' rights in hospitals were in moderate level. About 16% of the variance of the dependent variable of patient's rights, which was significant, is due to variations at the higher level of the hospital and other variations at the individual level. Furthermore, variables of bed occupancy, complaint rate, and hospital escape rate at the higher level (Hospital) have a significant impact on the patient's rights.
Sasan Moogahi, Farkhondeh Jamshidi, Negar Parvizi, Ali Mohammadi Sepahvandi,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
In medical centers, compliance of personal and social behaviors with ethics and religious standards is very important and requires constant evaluations. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the compliance of medical affairs with the standards of the Holy Sharia from the perspective of patients and interns in the teaching hospitals of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz in 2020. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and the statistical population consisted of 204 interns and 385 patients referred to the teaching hospitals of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz. Sampling was done randomly. Data were collected by data collection form and questionnaire from patients and interns which was collected by the researcher including 17 questions. Data were analyzed by SPSS version20 software and descriptive and inferential statistics. From the interns' point of view, there was a significant difference (P <0.05) between the compliance of medical affairs with the standards of holy sharia in different hospitals and gender, but there was no significant difference in different ages and marital status (P> 0.05). From the patients' point of view; There was no significant difference (P >0.05) between the compliance of medical affairs with the standards of the Holy Sharia based on gender, age, education, marital status, and hospital. From interns and patients point of view, compliance with Holy Sharia standards were 45.1% and 40.5%, respectively. According to the results of the present study, physical space and more medical staff in both genders are required to fully comply medical affairs with the standards of the Holy Sharia in all the examined hospitals.
Mahboubeh Shali, Samira Mohammadi, Hasan Shahbazi, Nooshin Kohan, Bagher Larijani, Shohreh Naderi Magham,
Volume 16, Issue 0 (ویژه نامه کاربست طرح های دو گروه اخلاق و آموزش پزشکی 2023)
Abstract
To enhance the level of health literacy among the public, it is essential to take steps towards empowering people to recognize and control the influential factors on health. University professors, as health knowledge promoters, are recognized as educators of health skills and advocates for healthy lifestyles and behaviors. This study aimed to elucidate the role of medical professors in promoting the health literacy of the public. The present study was conducted using conventional content analysis. The participants were selected using purposive sampling with maximum variation. A total of 20 professors from medical universities, the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, and the Ministry of Health were purposively selected until information saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed simultaneously with data collection. Twenty participants (9 females and 11 males) with an average age of 50.3 and an average work experience of 23.45 years took part in the study. After data analysis, 947 initial codes were extracted, and subsequently, categorized into five main categories and fifteen subcategories. Infrastructure development, content production, role model, self-empowerment, and culture building were identified as the main categories. University professors can, through a skillful combination of various elements within the educational system, either propel students and the general public towards lofty goals or deprive them of achieving such objectives. However, factors such as the low number of professors relative to the number of students, the high workload of faculty members, lack of resources, and the overwhelming life responsibilities of faculty members have influenced their performance and role in this regard. To achieve the goal of encouraging professors in enhancing the health literacy of society, it is imperative to bring these constraints to the attention of authorities for resolution.
Maryam Aala, Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Aeen Mohammadi, Neda Mehrdad, Moloud Payab, Snor Bayazidi, Mahin Nomali, Mohammad Eghbal Heidari, Alireza Olyaemanesh, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 16, Issue 0 (ویژه نامه کاربست طرح های دو گروه اخلاق و آموزش پزشکی 2023)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created opportunities and challenges for education and research as the two main academic activities in medical sciences disciplines, which due to their mutual influence can be used to propose solutions for improving these two areas. The present study was conducted to compare two review articles, each of which dealt with one of these two areas.
This comparative study with a qualitative explanatory design was conducted in three steps. First, two review articles were selected that investigated the opportunities and challenges caused by the coronavirus pandemic to propose strategies for the post-corona era. Then, both studies were carefully studied and described. Finally, two researchers separately extracted the similarities and differences mentioned in the two articles and compared them to remove the inconsistencies. A panel of experts confirmed the findings. The opportunities and challenges mentioned in the two articles were extracted and categorized into two areas based on similarities and differences. The similar proposed strategies for the post-corona era were continuing to use virtual space facilities, diversifying the communication methods with students and research participants, and providing and developing suitable electronic infrastructure. Comparing two review articles and determining the similarities and differences between the opportunities and challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the strategies for the post-COVID-19 era related to medical education and clinical research, led to proposing strategies that could promote these two related areas coherently.
Amirmohammad Azarakhsh, Mohammadreza Dinmohammadi, Kian Nouroozi Tabrizi, Kowsar Nouri,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the publication of research articles, transforming the landscape of academic writing and dissemination. However, the integration of AI in this process presents significant ethical challenges that require careful consideration. This review study utilized a comprehensive search strategy, employing keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "publication ethics," "ethical challenges," "academic integrity," and "research dissemination" to identify relevant articles in scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The search included articles published between 2010 and 2024 in both English and Persian. Research articles, systematic reviews, and case reports that included the specified keywords in their titles and abstracts were selected. A total of 150 articles were screened, and 50 relevant studies were included for detailed analysis. The analysis identified several ethical challenges associated with the use of AI in academic publishing. Concerns regarding academic integrity are paramount, as AI-generated content can blur the lines between original research and automated writing, raising concerns about authorship and plagiarism. Furthermore, the reliance on AI tools for data analysis and manuscript preparation can raise questions about the accuracy and validity of research findings. additionally, the potential for bias embedded within AI algorithms is a significant concern, as it can influence the selection of research topics, the framing of research questions, and even the peer review process. The lack of transparency in AI-driven editorial processes can further undermine trust in academic publishing. This review underscores the urgent need for robust ethical frameworks and regulations to guide the responsible use of AI in academic publishing. Increased awareness and training among researchers and editors regarding the ethical implications of AI are crucial. Interdisciplinary collaborations are essential to address these challenges effectively and ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of academic research in the AI era.
Hooman Heydary, Shakila Belkafeh, Mohammadreza Dinmohammadi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
Telehealth has emerged as a rapidly expanding method for delivering healthcare services, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. This approach has opened new avenues for accessing medical care and contributed to reducing healthcare costs. However, the growth of telehealth has introduced significant legal and ethical challenges that warrant thorough investigation. This review study employed keywords such as "telemedicine," "telehealth," "ethical challenges," "legal challenges," and "healthcare system" to search scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Articles published in English and Persian between 2010 and 2024 were reviewed. Eligible sources included research articles, systematic reviews, and case reports focusing on legal and ethical issues related to telehealth. Following an initial screening, articles were assessed based on quality and scientific credibility, and the selected works were analyzed for the final synthesis. Telehealth presents several critical challenges that must be addressed to ensure safe and equitable care delivery. One of the foremost concerns is patient privacy and data protection; the exchange of sensitive health information necessitates robust security protocols and adherence to data protection regulations to uphold patient confidentiality and trust. Another key issue is informed consent, which must be adapted to the virtual context to ensure patients are adequately informed of both the benefits and potential risks associated with telehealth services. While telehealth enhances healthcare accessibility, it may also deepen existing health disparities due to unequal access to digital technologies. Therefore, investments in communication infrastructure and digital literacy are essential to promote inclusivity and equal access to care. Although telehealth offers substantial benefits—including improved access, convenience, and enhanced coordination of care—its legal and ethical implications must not be overlooked. To fully realize its potential, stakeholders must collaborate in developing comprehensive regulations and ethical frameworks. Addressing these challenges is imperative to advancing telehealth in a manner that ensures patient safety, protects rights, and promotes health equity.
Milad Kazemi Najm, Tahereh Toulabi, Abbas Abbaszadeh, Rasoul Mohammadi, Nasrin Imanifar,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics 2024)
Abstract
Nurses, as the largest group of healthcare workers globally, are responsible for providing holistic care to patients. Holistic care encompasses physical, mental, social, and spiritual dimensions. This study aimed to determine the effect of professional ethics training on the spiritual care competence of emergency nurses. This two-group field trial study with a pre-test and post-test design was conducted with 84 nurses working in the emergency departments of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling. The intervention group participated in four workshops. The study tool was the Spiritual Care Competency Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, employing descriptive statistics (mean, median, and percentage) and inferential statistical tests, including repeated measures ANOVA, independent t-tests, and Fisher’s exact test.
The study included two groups: intervention (n = 42) and control (n = 42). Most participants in both groups were women. A significant difference was observed in the average total spiritual care competence scores and its dimensions (excluding the self-knowledge subscale) over different time points in the intervention group (P < 0.001). However, for the self-knowledge subscale, no significant difference was found in the average scores between the control and intervention groups at different time points. The results of this study demonstrated that professional ethics training improves nurses' spiritual care competence. By conducting workshops, training programs, and in-service courses on professional ethics and spiritual care, the quality of nursing care can be enhanced, ultimately improving patient safety. It is recommended that healthcare policymakers and nursing managers prioritize professional ethics as the foundation of all nursing practices. Employing innovative and engaging methods, such as the scenario-based approach used in this study, can further support the development of professional ethics in nursing.
Fatemeh Badr, Mostafah Roshanzadeh, Somayeh Mohammadi, Mina Shirvani, Samaneh Dehghan Abnavi,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Considering the important role of health organizations and the behavior and performance of nurses in achieving organizational goals, the moral foundations of nurses can significantly influence their behaviors and decisions and shape the organizational culture and atmosphere. Therefore, the present descriptive-analytical study aimed to investigate the relationship between moral foundations and organizational culture among 200 nurses selected using the census method at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences in 2023. Data were collected through a demographic information form along with questionnaires to measure moral foundations and organizational culture. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 via descriptive statistics (percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and analytical tests (t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation coefficient, and linear regression). Pearson’s correlation coefficient revealed a significant relationship between the mean scores of moral foundations and organizational culture among nurses (r=0.61, P<0.001). The coefficient of determination (R2=0.372) showed approximately 37% of the variance in organizational culture can be predicted by moral foundations. Among the dimensions of moral foundations, loyalty to the group, respect for authority, and purity significantly predicted organizational culture (P<0.001). The mean score of moral foundations among nurses was acceptable at 98.55±15.8, while the mean score of organizational culture was favorable at 105.74±25.7. Based on the findings from the present study it can be concluded that by creating a moral atmosphere and promoting moral values such as loyalty to the group, respect for authority, and purity in nurses, the organizational culture can be enhanced
Mostafa Roshanzadeh, Ali Taj, Somayeh Mohammadi,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
In the current health system conditions, the strategies adopted by nursing managers in their ethical decision-making can lead to different results for patients, nurses, and health systems. Therefore, the present study aimed to explain ethical decision-making strategies implemented by nursing managers. The present study was conducted using qualitative content analysis in 2022 at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. A total of 18 nursing managers were selected through purposive sampling and were interviewed using in-depth unstructured individual interviews. Data were analyzed using the method proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. The results revealed one main category (human-centeredness) and three subcategories (customer-centeredness, valuing employees’ dignity, and the conflict between respecting the rights of patients and employees and adhering to organizational policies). Nursing managers attempted to make their ethical decisions based on the principle of humanism by using customer-centeredness strategies, valuing employees’ dignity, and prioritizing the rights of individuals and employees over organizational rules. The results of the present study showed nursing managers make decisions in line with respecting the rights of patients and employees. However, sometimes these decisions conflict with the interests of organizations. In this regard, the existing obstacles that create the conditions for such conflicts should be identified. Increasing organizational commitment in managers can also be effective in decisions that benefit different groups of customers, personnel, and health organizations.
Rahele Samouei, D Farzane Mohammadi-Sefiddashti, Narges Meshkineh, Mostafa Amini-Rarani ,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Compliance with ethical principles in research by researchers plays a fundamental role in providing evidence-based and practical findings, subsequently solving society's problems and advancing knowledge. Despite numerous educational workshops and awareness-raising efforts, some unethical research practices are still observed. Identifying relevant factors is essential for practical and preventive planning. In this regard, the present study aimed to identify psychosocial determinants related to the ethical performance of researchers in conducting and publishing research works. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach based on conventional content analysis. A total of 29 faculty members and researchers from the medical sciences universities in Iran in various fields and specialties were selected purposively and semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. Qualitative content analysis was used to categorize data and Lincoln and Guba’s criteria were employed to evaluate data. Data analysis led to the identification of 136 codes, 20 subcategories, and 4 main categories. The factors related to the ethical performance of researchers in conducting and publishing research works derived from interviews with researchers included "Laws", "Social Learning", "Knowledge and Literacy", and "Psychological Characteristics". According to the findings of this study, the ethical performance of researchers in the field of research is the result of the interaction of social, individual, personality, and legislative factors. Some factors, like personality traits, are long-lasting, resistant, and personal, while social factors are widespread, common, and more general. Research policymakers and managers can improve the ethical performance of researchers and place ethics at the center of attention in research by implementing educational methods, culture building, and behavior change
Sooreh Khaki, Masoud Fallahi -Khoshknab, Farahnaz Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi, Gülbeyaz Can, Mohammad Ali Hosseini,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Conveying bad news to patients and their families is a process that requires team collaboration. Different countries have taken into consideration providing suitable solutions. This study aimed to develop an practical guideline, according to the experiences of patients, families, and healthcare providers in intensive care units across three phases. In the first phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with 31 participants selected through purposive sampling, and the initial draft of the practical guideline was created. In the second phase, the initial draft was discussed and reviewed by experts in two focus group meetings, and a secondary draft was developed. In the third phase, the practical guideline compiled by the Delphi method was validated by 43 experts in policymaking and decision-making. Finally, an practical guideline to deliver bad news to patients and their families was developed with 8 main steps and 43 sub-steps. The main steps included before delivering bad news (assessment, planning and preparation, coordination), during delivering bad news (announcing bad news, emotional support, summary and documentation), and after delivering bad news (referral, follow-up). This practical guideline is intended to facilitate the process of delivering bad news in intensive care units to achieve the desired outcomes and reduce the resulting consequences and harms. Accordingly, healthcare providers are recommended to consider the importance of patient and family preferences, adhering to scientific and standard methods for delivering bad news, and upholding the principles of professional ethics.
Fatemeh Fallah Tafti, Hamidreza Mohammadi,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract
This Article has no Abstract.