Showing 10 results for Covid-19
Kamran Shirbache, Saeed Pourhassan, Ali Shirbacheh,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemics, a huge flood of people rushed to medical centers, which severely affected working conditions of the medical staff. In this article, we are going to evaluate the reaction of health care workers to the rise of traffic, social gatherings, non-observance of mask use protocols and physical distance which lead to an increasing number of infected persons and death rate. Here, we address the impact of community’s indifference on medical staff which seems to decrease the quality of medical staff practice gradually
Zahra Sadeqi-Arani,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
Since the release of COVID-19 epidemic in late December 2020, recommendations issued for personal protection by the World Health Organization and National Health Organizations around the world. The most prominent of which has the use of masks to prevent the spread of the virus. Despite the importance of this solution, many people still resist using the mask. Therefore, this study, by emphasizing the effect of individual beliefs and norms on consumer behavior, predicts the rate of wearing of mask by people with 4 factors: systemic thinking, individual-social responsibility, moral obligations and individualism. The statistical population of this research consists of citizens of Kashan city. A questionnaire has been used to collect data. The results of the mean tests indicate that women use masks more than men. Also, with increasing age and education, the use of masks has increased. The results of regression analysis test show that 4 predictors had predictive power. The rate of mask use has a positive and significant relationship with the variables of systems thinking, individual-social responsibility, moral obligations and a negative and significant relationship with individualism. Also, moral obligations (β=0.694; p-value<0.05) and systemic thinking (β=0.107; p-value<0.1) had the most and least effect on the criterion variable (mask wearing), respectively. According to the findings of this study, it seems necessary to create and develop a systemic thinking, pay attention to individual and social responsibilities, strengthen moral obligations and avoid individualism in relation to desirable collective behaviors to manage a pandemic crisis. As a result, implementing strategies to enhance these individual characteristics can help can help to strengthen and form desirable collective behaviors such as wearing a mask in the time of COVID-19.
Mohammad Mirzaei, Behzad Joudaki, Zahra Bazouband, Ehsan Shariati Fard,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
The emerging and pervasive disease of COVID 19 (coronavirus disease), which has gone from an epidemic to a global pandemic, has created many challenges for the international community. Since this disease has certain characteristics such as the unknown and complexity of its origin, high extent and speed of its spread and transmission, high mutability, lack of definitive treatment so far for it, existence of incubation period and latency of the disease and many other features, it requires a comprehensive study and development of a comprehensive plan in all dimensions to be controlled and managed. Due to the high rate of transmission of this disease and lack of care by carriers and patients, COVID-19 has increased exponentially, and on the other hand, the long duration of the disease has caused people to neglect following health protocols, which itself causes other people to get sick. And while imposing a legal and moral burden in non-compliance with the rights of society, it threatens people’s security, physical and mental health. On the other hand, one of the goals of the jurisprudential rules and customary laws is to protect the life and health of individuals. The requirements and guarantees of the supervision of care and prevention against COVID-19 and the responsibility imposed on people who do not comply with health protocols will be the subject of this article. Accordingly, people who do not consider the minimum health standards against this virus have a responsibility if they are carriers, and if negligence or fault and attribution of harm or damage to other people is confirmed, they should be able to compensate the damage while being punished. There will also punishments if people are aware of being a carrier.
Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani, Fatemeh Bahmani, Mina Forouzandeh, Akram Hashemi,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers aspired to produce an effective vaccine with appropriate efficacy and low side effects to mitigate the pandemic. It seems that vaccination is the only mean to save the world from this pandemic. In this article, we will review the ethical challenges of mass vaccination (focusing on the vaccine distribution and uptake), referring to the main principles of bioethics. Safe and standard manufacturing and passing scientific and ethical stages, as well as evaluation of efficacy and safety monitoring, are the main considerations in the production of vaccines. Justice requires that vulnerable and high-risk individuals be vaccinated sooner. Public vaccination must therefore be ethically prioritized. Individuals may for some reason resist vaccination. For example due to, the confusion caused by mass media information, public’s distrust of the medical profession, the proposed relationship between vaccination and development of certain diseases, and finally low death rate due to covid 19 in some groups, especially young and healthy individuals. However, as the disease is highly contagious and if it spreads, the death rate and hospitalization due to the disease rises sharply, and the consequences of the disease mainly affect vulnerable people, in moral decision-making, the benefits and harms of the vaccine for each person should be considered against the benefits for and harms to the society. In addition, to respect the individuals’ autonomy, cultural modalities and persuasive programs shall be considered. This article is aimed to address the ethical issues of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout while proposing practical solutions to handle them.
Zahra Abbasi, Naima Seyedfatemi, Marjan Mardaani, Malihe Kadivar,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
This article has no abstract.
Dariush Azimi,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
The widespread and increasing number of deaths due to the Corona virus has caused many psychological injuries, including stress. Therefore, the aim of this study was to study the relationship between perceived stress and coping strategies of the family members of patients with Corona virus admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Ardabil medical centers. The present study is a descriptive-analytical study. Sampling was done by available method among the companions of patients with Corona virus infection admitted to the ICU (between May and September 2020). The number of research samples according to the results of a pilot study was estimated at 462 people. Available sampling method was used for sampling. Data collected included patient demographics, Cohen's Perceived Stress Questionnaire, and the Blinges-Moss Coping Styles Questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using independent t-test, Mann-Whitney, Spearman and Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance by SPSS software version 24. The results showed that the mean and standard deviation of perceived stress were 44.80 ± 5.92 and emotion-oriented and problem-oriented coping styles were 19.08 ± 3.02 and 32.35 ± 5.54, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficient test showed a significant relationship between perceived stress with problem-oriented coping style (r = 0.321) and emotion-oriented coping style (r = 0.113) (p <0.05). This study showed that the companions of coronary patients admitted to the intensive care unit use more emotional coping methods, which results in increased emotional behaviors. Therefore, in order to help the psychological health of coronary patients, it is possible to strengthen the application of problem-oriented coping style by designing and implementing educational and supportive-care programs.
Mohammad Torabi, Mahsa Eslamipanah,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
Nurses are among the members of the treatment team who have the most contact with Corona Virus Disease- 2019 (COVID-19) patients and their ethical decision-making is inevitable during patient care. On the other hand, nurses' motivation to implement end-of-life care is influenced by their attitude, awareness, and moral reasoning. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of ethical decision making of nurses and its relationship with the attitudes of end-of-life care of patients with COVID-19 in hospitals affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2021. In this study, 180 nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences were selected by convenience sampling method. Data collection tools included: demographic Information questionnaire, Nursing Dilemma Test (NDT) questionnaire, and Frommelt Attitudes towards End-of-Life Care questionnaire. According to the results, there is a direct relationship between nurses' ethical decisions and the attitude of end-of-life care (<0.05, r=0.819). The mean score of nurses' ethical decision-making indicates the low level of ethical decision-making (39.19 (5.3)) and the mean score of nurses' practical considerations (20.62(4.2)) showed that the process of nurses' ethical decision-making is relatively influenced by environmental factors. Also, the average score of nurses' exposure to moral challenges indicates that nurses are familiar with similar situations. The mean score of nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care was reported at an undesirable level (81.58(7.8)). According to the results, by identifying the factors affecting nurses' ethical decision-making and educational planning to improve their decision-making level, it is possible to improve the quality of patients care while improving nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care.
Maryam Aala, Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Aeen Mohammadi, Neda Mehrdad, Moloud Payab, Snor Bayazidi, Mahin Nomali, Mohammad Eghbal Heidari, Alireza Olyaemanesh, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 16, Issue 0 (11-2023)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created opportunities and challenges for education and research as the two main academic activities in medical sciences disciplines, which due to their mutual influence can be used to propose solutions for improving these two areas. The present study was conducted to compare two review articles, each of which dealt with one of these two areas.
This comparative study with a qualitative explanatory design was conducted in three steps. First, two review articles were selected that investigated the opportunities and challenges caused by the coronavirus pandemic to propose strategies for the post-corona era. Then, both studies were carefully studied and described. Finally, two researchers separately extracted the similarities and differences mentioned in the two articles and compared them to remove the inconsistencies. A panel of experts confirmed the findings. The opportunities and challenges mentioned in the two articles were extracted and categorized into two areas based on similarities and differences. The similar proposed strategies for the post-corona era were continuing to use virtual space facilities, diversifying the communication methods with students and research participants, and providing and developing suitable electronic infrastructure. Comparing two review articles and determining the similarities and differences between the opportunities and challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the strategies for the post-COVID-19 era related to medical education and clinical research, led to proposing strategies that could promote these two related areas coherently.
Hanieh Karimi, Ali Farahmand Asil, Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract
Trust between doctors and patients is a cornerstone of improved health outcomes and quality medical care. However, this trust has eroded in recent decades due to various factors. The global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique opportunity to examine and analyze changes in public trust towards the healthcare system. This narrative review explores the state of public trust in healthcare before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, analyzing the factors influencing this trust and proposing strategies for its maintenance and rebuilding. A narrative review was conducted, with information gathered from searches in reputable national and international scientific databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Scopus. Relevant articles from Iranian databases such as Magiran and IranMedex were also included. The review focused on the components of trust, factors affecting it, and challenges faced by the healthcare system during the pandemic. The review revealed significant changes in the components of trust in doctor-patient relationships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, public trust in physicians had been declining due to factors such as perceived inequities in treatment, medical errors, and unprofessional behavior by some healthcare professionals. For example, surveys indicate a decline in public trust in healthcare professionals in the United States, dropping from 73% in 1966 to 34% in 2012. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly exacerbated this decline, with many people distrusting governmental institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and media outlets perceived to be providing misleading information. A study in Poland found that 31% of respondents viewed the pandemic as an exaggerated threat, while 3% considered it entirely fictional. However, the dedicated service and transparent communication of some institutions and healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 crisis partially restored public trust. This led to the emergence of a concept known as "dual trust," where people not only trust individual physicians but also pay closer attention to the overall performance of the healthcare system and governments. Dual trust has implications not only for the quality of healthcare services but also for the success of prevention and treatment programs. The COVID-19 crisis has had a profound impact on public trust in the healthcare system. To maintain and rebuild this trust, effective measures are essential. These measures should focus on enhancing service quality, fostering scientifically informed citizens, ensuring transparent communication, and promoting positive interactions between doctors and patients.
Shahrbanoo Salehin,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency that has challenged many ethical issues. This study aimed to investigate the challenges and considerations of midwifery professional ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing qualitative content analysis, raw data were collected through an extensive literature review, utilizing purposive sampling until data saturation was achieved. Data trustworthiness was ensured based on Lincoln and Guba's criteria and data were analyzed using an inductive method. A total of 4 themes and 17 main categories were extracted. The themes and categories included: 1. Ethical challenges in deciding on midwifery care and place of delivery (ethical challenges of home birth, ethical challenges of hospital delivery, facing ethical challenges), 2. Clinical ethical principles (beneficence, equitable distribution and justice, solidarity, trust, duty to care), 3. Ethical principles in management (equal concern and respect, minimizing harm caused by the pandemic, inter-sectoral cooperation, evidence-based decision-making), 4. Support for midwives' rights (psychological support for midwives, gender considerations among midwives, midwifery training, workplace health, support policies). Midwives encounter various ethical challenges in pandemics. Thus, developing an ethical framework for decision-making in pandemics can help address these challenges.
