Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Critical Care

Hedayat Jafari, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Mobina Abedinpour,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract

Compassion fatigue refers to the physical and emotional exhaustion experienced by healthcare professionals due to prolonged exposure to job-related stress and the emotional demands of caring for others. Compassionate care is vital for achieving better patient outcomes, but various factors during healthcare delivery can compromise it. This study examines the factors influencing compassion fatigue among critical care nurses. This systematic review was conducted by searching databases including SID, Magiran, Irandoc, Iranmedex, Civilica, Science Direct, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Keywords used in the search included “compassion fatigue,” “critical care,” “intensive care,” “nurses,” “compassion satisfaction,” and “burnout.” After removing duplicates, studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Ultimately, 23 studies met the criteria and were included in the systematic review (qualitative synthesis). The studies included in this review were conducted between 2012 and 2024, with a total of 5,820 participants. The review found that both workplace structural factors and demographic characteristics of nurses, such as age, sex, marital status, nationality, educational level, resilience, length of shifts, experience in critical care settings, place of work, position within the unit, and nurse-to-patient ratios, are causes and predictors of compassion fatigue. Leadership and administrative support in clinical settings, as well as the coping strategies employed by nurses, were identified as factors that mitigate the impact of compassion fatigue among critical care nurses. This systematic review highlights the profound impact of compassion fatigue on nurses and emphasizes the roles of workplace environment and demographic factors in its development. The findings underscore the importance of supportive leadership and effective coping strategies in reducing compassion fatigue and enhancing compassion satisfaction among critical care nurses. By addressing these factors, healthcare organizations can reduce burnout, improve nurse well-being, and enhance patient care and clinical outcomes.
 

Safoura Dorri, Seyed Ali Rasooli, Hamideh Hakimi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract

Moral sensitivity, defined as the ability to recognize and assess the ethical complexities of clinical situations and make appropriate ethical decisions, is a crucial skill for nurses. Despite its importance, various studies report varying levels of moral sensitivity among nurses, suggesting a gap in this competency. Nurses’ continuous exposure to ethical dilemmas can lead to adverse outcomes, including psychological and moral distress, decreased job satisfaction, and compromised care quality. As moral sensitivity can differ across healthcare settings and may change over time, studies assessing its levels across different periods are essential. This study aims to assess the level of moral sensitivity among nurses in hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 200 nurses working in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) of four large hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Participants were selected using a random sampling method. Data were collected using a demographic information form and the Lutzen Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, employing descriptive statistics such as means and standard deviations. The findings revealed that the average moral sensitivity score among the nurses was moderate (60.17±13.04). When analyzing the different dimensions of moral sensitivity, the highest score was observed in the dimension of "honesty and benevolence" (15.30 ± 4.48), while the lowest score was found in the dimension of "professional knowledge" (3.25 ± 1.88). The mean scores for the remaining dimensions were as follows: "respect for patient autonomy" (7.44 ± 2.13), "awareness of how to communicate with patients" (15.18 ± 3.41), "experiencing ethical problems and dilemmas" (7.74 ± 2.03), and "applying ethical concepts in ethical decision-making" (11.95 ± 3.35). The study revealed that nurses demonstrated a moderate level of moral sensitivity, with the lowest scores in the dimension of professional knowledge. This suggests that nurses may not be sufficiently involving patients in their treatment and care decisions. Given these findings, it is critical for healthcare policymakers and nursing managers to implement continuous assessment and feedback systems to accurately evaluate nurses' moral sensitivity and professional knowledge. By identifying the weaknesses and educational needs of nurses, targeted training programs can be developed, ultimately enhancing nurses' moral sensitivity and improving the quality of care.
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb