Showing 7 results for Patient Rights
Razieh Zahedi, Farzaneh Zahedi,
Volume 5, Issue 5 (10-2012)
Abstract
Providing sufficient information for patients and other healthcare clients is necessary to protect their rights in health systems. In this realm, medical librarians, especially in hospital libraries, can play an important role in supporting patients' rights. Professional national and international associations have compiled and promulgated some codes and guidelines in some countries however, there are many shortcomings in this area in our country. This paper aims to review the status of patients' and other healthcare clients' rights in professional codes of ethics of library and information sciences and professional standards of hospital libraries. We hope the results can provide us with an approach for a more strict observance of patients' rights in our country. This paper reviews professional codes of ethics of library and information sciences and professional standards of hospital libraries. We will contemplate on the articles related to patients' and other healthcare receivers' rights. The findings show that providing patients with information is a pivotal element in professional codes of ethics of library and information sciences and professional standards of hospital libraries. Interactive and knowledge-based information (KBI) that is based on improvement of performance and finding clinical solutions (not just education without practical impact) have aided clinical librarians in protection of patients' rights in some countries.Considering the roles of libraries and information centers in collecting, organizing and making accessible the information for their users, librarians and information scientist should make effective utilization of information possible for healthcare clients, while taking into account their specific needs. Therefore, it is essential to compile professional codes of ethics containing the appropriate approach to disseminate information to patients and other healthcare clients, and to define specific roles for clinical librarians in hospitals and medical clinics.
Hossein Bagheri, Faride Yaghmaei, Tahere Ashktorab, Farid Zayeri,
Volume 6, Issue 6 (2-2014)
Abstract
Respect for the inherent dignity of human beings means respecting their basic rights in different environments, and this has an important role in studies and discussions about health care. This study was conducted on the development and psychometric properties of the Inherent Dignity Questionnaire (IDQ) in heart failure patients. The present study is a methodological research for designing a questionnaire. First, 22 patients with class II to IV heart failure were chosen by purposive sampling from patients of Hazrate Rasoule Akram, Imam Hossein and Shariati hospitals of Tehran, and semi-structured interviews were conducted on ethical issues until data saturation was achieved. A qualitative content analysis was carried out to analyze the interviews. Then, based on the findings obtained from the interviews, literature, and the designed questionnaires about inherent dignity, 39 items associated with inherent dignity in heart failure patients were developed. The face validity of the questionnaire was determined. To measure the content validity of the questionnaire, opinions of 12 experts were used considering Content Validity Index (CVI), Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lawshe table. To assess construct validity of the IDQ, exploratory factor analysis and to determine the reliability of the questionnaire, internal consistency with Chronbach’s alpha coefficient and split-half method were used on 130 patients with heart failure. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 19.Through face validity and content validity analysis, 4 out of the 39 primary items were removed, leaving 35 items. Through exploratory factor analysis, 11 items with factor loading less than 0.5 were removed and the IDQ was created with 24 items and three factors (9 items on the first factor, 8 items on the second factor and 7 items on third factor). These factors were: "inherent dignity in family", "inherent dignity in the community" and "inherent dignity in health care environments". Reliability of the Social Dignity Questionnaire (SDQ) was calculated to be 0.94 by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and 0.96 by using split-half method.Results of this study showed that the IDQ is adequately valid and reliable. Therefore, using this questionnaire can be beneficial to planning support for patients and improving their treatment and care and doing further research related to dignity in different patients.
Kobra Omidfar,
Volume 8, Issue 4 (11-2015)
Abstract
Medical laboratory is one of the health service providers that intensely responsible for the life of patient / client. With an increase in the number and variety of laboratory tests in recent years, the role of laboratory science in identifying and assessing the cause of disease has been more recognized. Performing the laboratory tests with the utmost accuracy, precision and speed using up to date methods as well as protecting the rights, integrity and respecting human dignity and also the establishment of priorities and the requisites for quality management systems can have a significant impact on patient satisfaction and quality which are the characteristics of a good medical laboratory. The principle concept of doing good and not doing bad is the essence of every code of medical ethics. Therefore, in laboratory medicine like other areas of medical sciences, there are ethical questions that have become more complex with the development of diagnostic tests. Medical laboratory practitioners usually deal with issues of confidentiality of patient information, as well as issues related to research ethics, professional ethics and business ethics.This study has collected important and common topics of medical ethics in laboratory medicine which leads to increase readers’ and practitioners’ information in this field. It is hoped that such information could be effective and practical to improve the laboratorial services for patients.
Farzan Azodi, Maryam Mousavinasab, Nilofar Davani, Parisa Mirzaei, Faezeh Jahanpour,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Patient rights is one of the essential rights that should be considered by the medical staff, checking and comparing the attitudes of first and last year medical students to inform the ethical points of service delivery is important. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate of first and last year medical students' attitude about respecting patients' rights in hospitals of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. The present study was a descriptive, cross-sectional study carried out by using a questionnaire derived from Patient Right Charter approved by the Ministry of Health. The study population included all the first and last year of medical students of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. The sample size was 113 and the sampling method was census. By using independent t-test and Pearson correlation, data analysis was performed by SPSS19 software. The attitude of first year students' was 76.36 ± 13.90 and among seniors was 71.63 ± 8.08, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). %52 of first and %84 of last year medical students had respectively and relatively favorable attitude regarding patients' rights. There was not statistically significant relationship between students' attitude and demographic factors. First year students had a better attitude among patient rights than the last year students. Therefore, planning to improve the students' attitude of observing patients' rights during the years of study is recommended.
Hamid Reza Namazi, Nafiseh Momeni,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Over the past years in the literature of medical ethics about the doctor-patient relationship, patient's rights have been greatly considered, but the other side of this relationship is not concerned, and the physician’s obligations have been highlighted. The two meanings are understood from the concept of physicians’ rights; their rights in conflict with the patient rights’ and the right to self improvement. We want to review the causes of this neglect and its complications. The reasons for not paying attention to the physician’s rights include: traditional beliefs about the power imbalance in doctor-patient relationship, lack of emphasis in the four principles of medical ethics, lack of supportive structures, customer-orientation in medicine, and hyper medical professionalism. Continuing this neglect creates complications that include: physicians’ work-life imbalance, symbolic violence in their society, burnout of physicians, forgetting the principle of gratitude and ultimately, the lack of respect for patients' rights. Consequently, the discourse of medical ethics fails to achieve its primary goals.
Hadi Jalilvand, Mojtaba Abdi, Matineh Pourrahimi, Alireza Jalilvand , Dorsa Tanharo, Negin Vali, Hamed Abbasi Joshaty , Yaghoob Hassan , Somaye Norouzi , Mohaddeseh Alizadeh, Sahar Aghaee,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
Human is spiritual dimensions that has legal status in health and disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of nursing and midwifery students about patient rights in Iran Universities of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals’ in 2017. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study in 2017 with convenience sampling method. Data was collected by a three-part questionnaire including demographic information, Knowledge about the Patient Rights Charter, and strategies for student information to deal with patient rights. Mann-Whitney and Spearman tests were used for data analysis. A total of 1219 undergraduate students participated in this study. The mean score of students' awareness of the Patient Rights Charter was 13.54±4.45 out of 29 points. 1007 students (82.61%) reported that education about patient right was sufficient. Direct correlation was between patient knowledge awareness score with pre-internship training (r = 0.461) and learning from instructor information (r = 0.512) and there was a negative correlation between self-education (r = -0.151) and other methods of information acquisition (r = -0.067). Given that most students did not consider the educational content taught in the field of patient rights to be effective, it can be concluded that these methods were ineffective and failed to convey the correct information. Therefore, revising of the Patient Rights Curriculum for Nursing and Midwifery students is recommended
Hossein Motaarefi, Shahriar Sakhaei, Amin Soheili, Hassan Ebrahimpour Sadagheyani,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract
Patients’ perceptions of healthcare service quality and satisfaction with their legal rights constitute the primary objective of the care team and should be considered a criterion for accreditation evaluation. In this regard, a thorough examination of healthcare providers’ and patients’ perceptions, emotions, and experiences regarding the reasons for ‘Discharge Against Medical Advice’—as a patient’s legal right—can help identify hidden factors influenced by temporal and spatial conditions. This qualitative study employed a conventional content analysis approach, involving semi-structured interviews with 24 healthcare providers and patients selected purposively. Researchers repeatedly reviewed recorded content and notes to code the data. Subsequently, key codes and themes were clustered, categorized into specific topics, and labeled. Finally, an interpretation of the obtained data reflecting the study’s approach was presented. Through conventional content analysis, 203 codes were extracted. After categorization, four subthemes, including human factors, processes, facilities, and environment, were identified under the core theme of “uncertainty and distrust” as reasons for discharge against medical advice. Discharge against medical advice is recognized as both a challenge for hospital accreditation and an adverse outcome for patients. Addressing uncertainty-related issues and fostering public trust through team collaboration and implementing novel policies can mitigate discharge against medical advice.
