Showing 5 results for Communication Skill
Mojtaba Parsa, Alireza Bagheri, Bagher Larijani,
Volume 4, Issue 6 (12-2011)
Abstract
Breaking bad news to the patients does not back to a long history and is a controversial issue between patients and physicians. Many physicians are reluctant to breaking bad news to patients and this is not desirable for most patients. For example, in Northern European countries and United States, most physicians usually break bad news to the patients, while in Southern and Eastern European countries or many Asian countries they would not do so. In Iran, physicians prefer to break bad news to patient's family rather than the patient. Cultural differences also influence people's viewpoints about breaking bad news. In Western countries, most people agree with breaking bad news to patients while it is not common in the other populations. Nowadays, the dominant view in the most countries is that it is the duty of the physicians to break bad news to patients. Some advantages of breaking bad news to patients including strengthening the trust between physician and patient, preventing non - maleficience, increasing patients satisfaction and reducing legal action against the doctors. There are some exceptions to breaking bad news the most important is serious psychological damage to the patient. Quality and quantity of information that should be released depends on situation of each patient. Breaking bad news needs specific communication skills and physicians must be trained for this purpose.
Omid Asemani,
Volume 5, Issue 4 (7-2012)
Abstract
Medicine is known as a combination of science and art. Besides knowledge, a good physician should be equipped with the art of establishing communication with patients. The keystone of any efficient relationship like a therapeutic one is trust, and its deterioration makes the relationship deficient and based on mere need. Therefore, establishing an efficient relationship brings about positive results in treatment. In the last two decades, the trend in the physician-patient relationship has greatly changed, so that patient-centered care is now in focus. In this kind of relationship, physicians recognize patients as respectable human beings with their unique beliefs, attitudes, and concerns, etc. In this paper we intend to provide a brief introduction to the concept of physician-patient relationship and its chronological changes. Also, common models of physician-patient relationships (e.g. paternalistic, etc) are introduced, compared, and their most obvious strengths and weak points are analyzed. At the end, a succinct analysis on the dominant model(s) of physician-patient relationship in Iran&aposs medical settings has been provided, and the necessity of compiling a model based on Islamic values is proposed.
Sayyed Esmaeil Managheb, Masoumeh Hosseinpour, Fatemeh Mehrabi,
Volume 6, Issue 4 (10-2013)
Abstract
Breaking bad news is an unavoidable part of the medical profession, and doctors and patients stand at the two sides of this function. There are different views about how to break bad news in different cultures and societies. In this study we assessed the viewpoints of hospitalized patients on how to break bad news.
This cross sectional study was performed in 2011 at the Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. Sample size of 110 patients was calculated and the method of sampling was simple random sampling. Target population was the hospitalized patients of Peymanyeh and Motahari hospitals in Jahrom. Entry criteria consisted of being admitted to the above hospitals, and exclusion criteria included severely ill patients and patients with mental disorders. A reliable self-administered questionnaire was designed and validated. The questionnaires were completed and returned by 110 patients. Data were analyzed using the SPSS16 software through descriptive analysis. One hundred and ten patients were included in this study. The factor analysis showed three elements: methods of breaking bad news, the people involved in the breaking bad news process, and timing and location. Of participants 78% wanted to be told the bad news while their relatives were present, 63.2% wanted to be told the bad news in a private and quiet room. Almost all respondents emphasized the need for religious advisors and psychological counselors (77.2% and 62.5% respectively). Most of participants (91.5%) wished to receive all the information about the etiology of their disease, and 74.8% of them wanted to be told whether their illness was cancer.This study showed that there are different views on how to break bad news in different cultures and societies. Social and cultural differences must be considered in breaking bad news. In our country, patients’ families could have a prominent supporting role in the delivery of bad news to patients.
Marjan Sadat Arshiha, Khazar Layegh Talari, Fatemeh Noghani, Naser Sedghi Goyaghaj, Taraneh Taghavi Larijani,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (10-2016)
Abstract
Moral intelligence is the ability to utilize principal criteria that can lead to effectiveness of individual reactions. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between moral intelligence and communication skills among bachelor’s students in nursing at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2016-2017.
This was a descriptive-correlational study. The study population consisted of all nursing students studying at the School of Nursing and Midwifery of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Among the study population, 204 subjects were selected through convenience sampling method and based on the inclusion criteria (direct acceptance in the field of nursing, absence of any illness, and willingness to participate). The data collection tools consisted of a demographic characteristic questionnaire, the Moral Intelligence Scale (Lennick & Kiel), and the Communication Skills Inventory (Jerabek). The validity and reliability of both instruments had been approved in similar studies in the country using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.88 and α = 0.71, respectively). The reliability of the two questionnaires was calculated in the current research using Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.85 and α = 0.81, respectively). Data were analyzed using descriptive (average and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and ANOVA test) in SPSS software. The mean moral intelligence score was 71.98±7.12 and ranged from 20 to 100 and mean communication skills score was 114.9±9.67 and ranged from 34 to 170. Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a significant and positive relation between moral intelligence and communication skills of nursing students (r=0.54, P ≤ 0.001). Thus, the communication skills of students can be improved by strengthening their moral intelligence. Therefore, it is suggested that the grounds for the strengthening of moral intelligence among nursing students be provided.
Halimeh Zarei, Parviz Azodi, Marzieh Mahmoudi, Zahra Sedighi, Faezeh Jahanpour,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
Communication skills are recognized as an essential part of nursing services and as they are faced with an extended range of referees, they have to communicate with them in a specific way. This study was performed to determine the communication skills of nursing staff of pediatric wards with their colleagues. This descriptive-analytic study as cross-sectional was performed on 110 nursing staff of pediatric wards from Persian Gulf’s hospital during 2019, in Bushehr, Iran, by using census sampling method. Data collection tool was a communication skills’ questionnaire including demographic part and items for self assessing communication skills of nurses with their colleagues. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed in previous studies. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using independent t-test, Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA at the significant level of 0.05. The mean score of professional communication was 54.33 ± 7.26 which was relatively significant. Scores of professional communication were not statistically associated with age, work experience, educational degree, employment status, type of responsibility, interest to job and marital status. The results showed statistically significant relationship between the mean scores of professional relationship with workplace (p <0.013) and shift work (p <0.020). The highest professional communication score was 58.83 in the nursing office and the lowest score was 50.21 in the pediatric emergency department. The Pearson correlation between age and work experience was positive with the mean score of professional communication, and the highest score of professional communication was related to staff working in shift work. According to the findings of the present study, the status of professional communication among nursing staff of pediatric wards was relatively desirable and therefore, based on the results, it is suggested that nursing authorities and planners plan and endeavor to enhance nurses' professional communication.