Search published articles


Showing 12 results for Decision-Making
Decision making on the prolongation of the life of severely diseased newborns: reinspection of criteria
Omid Asemani, Hakimeh Parsaei,
Volume 5, Issue 5 (10-2012)
Abstract

Birth of a poor prognosis neonate (premature and/or congenitally affected) may potentially burden the family and/or society with many ethical, social, legal, etc challenges. Most of the decision making criteria used in handling the care of these neonates, such as disability, quality of life, etc., are multidimensional and heavily ethical bearing. In this study, we have tried to explore and present a perfect view on the existing challenges and different dimensions of the discussed criteria. In the end, the prominent standpoint of the Islamic school in confronting a severely disabled newborn has been introduced and analyzed. Most related discussions boil down to some fundamental and unanswered questions, for instance whether human beings should be permitted to make decisions about the life of severely diseased neonates, the decision making criteria themselves and their appropriateness, etc. Even though many scientists have theorized on the subject, a multilateral explanation of life and death criterion has not been presented yet. One thing is for certain and that is, in answering the basic questions of the subject, our present knowledge and experience is limited and insufficient. The authors have tried to show that despite many western views, decision making about the life of a neonate has no place in Islamic teachings, since it could be considered an unauthorized human action. Instead, it is proposed that any attempt to provide an ethical rationale, while utilizing today's science and technology, be in compliance with God's commandments.


The relationship between ethical reasoning and demographic characteristics of nurses
Aliakbar Koohi, Morteza Khaghanizade, Abbas Ebadi,
Volume 9, Issue 1 (5-2016)
Abstract

As a result of the changes made in health care systems, nurses nowadays are faced with more complicated ethical dilemmas. Therefore, they need to be familiar with ethical decision-making procedures and have the ability to perform ethical reasoning. The present study aimed to evaluate this ability in nurses and investigate its relationship with demographic characteristics in a subspecialized hospital in Tehran during 2015. This was a descriptive-analytical study, and the research population consisted of 245 qualified nurses selected by census. A demographic questionnaire and Crisham’s Nursing Dilemma Test were used to collect the data. Descriptive-analytical tests and SPSS software version 22 were used for data analysis. Based on the, the mean value of the nurses’ ethical reasoning was 40.81 ± 6.72, which is lower than the average score of the test. Furthermore, increased work experience led to a reduction in the mean value of ethical reasoning (P ≤ 0.05). Overall, single subjects scored higher in the mean ethical reasoning than those who were married (P ≤ 0.05), but no significant relationship was observed between other demographic characteristics and the mean of ethical reasoning. Due to the nurses’ low ability to perform ethical reasoning, further studies will need to be conducted on proper training methods to promote ethical decision-making in nurses. As regards the reduced ethical reasoning ability in nurses with more work experience, it is necessary to identify the reasons and devise appropriate solutions with the help of nursing managers and hospital ethics committees.


Evaluation and comparison of conventional ethical decision-making models in medicine
Mansoure Madani, Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani,
Volume 9, Issue 1 (5-2016)
Abstract

Moral dilemmas are among the most important challenges in medical ethics. Dilemmas can occur frequently during a physician’s career and if physicians lack the ability and skills to solve them, they may be pushed to unethical behavior. Bioethics experts have always been concerned with solving ethical dilemmas in the medical profession and facilitating physicians’ decision-making process. Therefore, they often try to find useful and practical solutions by combining the views of different schools of ethics. Designing decision-making models is part of their effort to apply ethics in medicine. It is impossible to solve dilemmas without acquiring the necessary skills, and the ability to apply a decision-making model can be part of the training process.

These models aim to facilitate ethical decision-making in the field of health care by providing various frameworks. This article aims to introduce and evaluate the popular models of ethical decision-making in medicine in the hope of helping physicians choose appropriate solutions when faced with moral challenges. By presenting the advantages of applying the model approach and offering a brief introduction to popular models, the article recommends applying the approach in analyzing and resolving ethical dilemmas. Although the models each have their advantages and disadvantages, becoming proficient in their application will facilitate ethical decision-making for physicians.


A review of the evolution and challenges in nursing role development
Shamsa Ahmadian, Jamileh Mokhtari,
Volume 9, Issue 6 (3-2017)
Abstract
Nursing role development was created to response to the challenge of balancing supply and demand in healthcare system. The aim of this study is to examine the evolution in nursing role development and subsequent experience in dealing with the challenges in the world. In this study, electronic resources were searched till to 2015 by English keywords contain 'Role development' and 'Nursing role' in combination and individually. Data were extracted from articles that were more relevant. This study found two approaches regarding nursing role development. First, the role extension that relates to progressing in the field of medicine and the traditional functions of physicians, and the role expansion that implies any enlargement of the nurse's role within the boundaries of nursing education, theory and practice. In many countries that seek to expansion/extension of the nurses’ role. However, despite the shortage that exist in nursing and also because of the increased workload of nurses, caused employment of workers with lower skills and in result multiple significantly challenges have been experienced.  In our country, nursing role development has not considerable progress. The current situation does not provide enough infrastructures such as the licensing professional qualification and data-based decision-making from monitoring the effect of changes on the quality of care. Therefore, decision-making about the implementation of any changes in the nursing profession and its role development, must be accomplished very prudential with regard to all aspects of the professional Ethics.
 

Illustration and analysis of information on moral distress and its dimensions among nurses in educational- therapeutic health centers
Masoumeh Hasanlo, Arezo Azarm, Parvaneh Asadi, Azar Avazeh, Mitra Hojt Ansari, Hossein Ebrahimi, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi,
Volume 10, Issue 0 (3-2017)
Abstract
Stressful ethical situations are considered as one of the problems of nursing profession, which disrupts the competence of simultaneous application of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values in patient care. Since clinical nurses are more exposed to ethical distress due to their nature of job, especially in in critical care and psychiatric wards, this study was conducted to analyze the relationship between three dimensions of moral distress. In this descriptive-correlational study 545 nurses from Tabriz educational centers were selected by census method in 2013-2014. The moral distress scale (MDS) questionnaire was distributed among partcipants and data was collected during nine months. Data were analyzed by SPSS V13, descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient. According to the findings, the mean of moral distress was 141.89 ± 29.6 (in the intermediate range). Chi-square test showed the relationship between the dimensions of moral distress (the relation between patient's ignorance, decision-making power, and professional competence) (P <0.05). According to the Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient test, there was a direct and significant correlation between the dimensions of moral distress (P <0.05). There was a meaningful correlation between the moral distress and the demographic characteristic of the educational level (P <0.05). Considering the direct and meaningful relationship between three dimensions of moral distress (patient's ignorance, decision-making power, and professional competence), each dimension of moral distress affects another as aggravating or modifying factor. Therefore, it is recommended that planners and health care administrators at the macro level provide appropriate programs to increase the nurse's attention and support to patients and reinforce decision-making power and professional competence by increasing the number of nurses and other controlling programs.
Which Is The Most Determinative In Emergency Cases? Patient Autonomy or Physician's Decision: A Clinical Case-Study
Seyed Saied Seyed Mortaz, Parvin Delavar, Nafiseh Zafarghandi, Mohammad Reza Yektaei, Qolamreza Moarefi, Ali Davati, Shiva Rafati, Siamak Afshin Majd, Ahia Garshasbi,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract
A 62-year-old man referred to the emergency department 48 hours ago with chief complaint of repeated bloody vomiting. The patient is admitted and the necessary measures are taken. Within 24 hours, he received 6 units of blood. The patient has undergone endoscopy, but endoscopic endorsement has failed to stop the bleeding. The surgeon consulted and visited the patient. He considered urgent emergency laparotomy. The patient is alert and refuses surgery. The hemodynamic status of the patient is not stable and gastrointestinal bleeding continues. These questions are posed to medical staff and hospital managers: "What is our duty”? "Should we respect the choice of the patient and witness the progress of the disease and deterioration of the patient's condition"? "Can he be discharged from the hospital on the basis of the patient's refusal to take medical treatment"? "Can we take appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures with the use of legal capacity and support despite patient’s opposition? "How can one regard autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence at the same time, in this situation "? In this study, which is one of the problems of medical ethics, the ethical, legal, and health aspects of the presented patient are discussed.

Ethical Considerations in Respecting Patient's Autonomy and Right to Refuse Treatment: A case Report
Mohamad Nader Sharifi, Pooneh Salari,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
One of the most challenging aspects of treatment is when patient seriously refuses the desired by treating physician. On the other hand, refusing treatment is a condition of the patient's right to be aware, but does such a right also imposes a moral obligation on the treating physician or not? This study discusses the diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosis disease. This article attempts to provide an overview of the ethical considerations for obtaining informed consent for a patient who refuses treatment. In this report, according to the patient's age, it can be concluded that although the patient has the capacity to make decisions, but because her age is below the legal age and does not have the authority to decide, her refusal to receive treatment cannot be accepted and it is necessary to make a decision based on the supreme interests of the patient with the opinion of a qualified legal guardian in this regard, taking into account the scientific aspects.

Evaluating the Level of Ethical Decision Making of Nurses and Its Relationship with the Attitudes of End-Of-Life Care of Patients with COVID-19
Mohammad Torabi, Mahsa Eslamipanah,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
Nurses are among the members of the treatment team who have the most contact with Corona Virus Disease- 2019 (COVID-19) patients and their ethical decision-making is inevitable during patient care. On the other hand, nurses' motivation to implement end-of-life care is influenced by their attitude, awareness, and moral reasoning. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of ethical decision making of nurses and its relationship with the attitudes of end-of-life care of patients with COVID-19 in hospitals affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2021. In this study, 180 nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences were selected by convenience sampling method. Data collection tools included: demographic Information questionnaire, Nursing Dilemma Test (NDT) questionnaire, and Frommelt Attitudes towards End-of-Life Care questionnaire. According to the results, there is a direct relationship between nurses' ethical decisions and the attitude of end-of-life care (<0.05, r=0.819). The mean score of nurses' ethical decision-making indicates the low level of ethical decision-making (39.19 (5.3)) and the mean score of nurses' practical considerations (20.62(4.2)) showed that the process of nurses' ethical decision-making is relatively influenced by environmental factors. Also, the average score of nurses' exposure to moral challenges indicates that nurses are familiar with similar situations. The mean score of nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care was reported at an undesirable level (81.58(7.8)). According to the results, by identifying the factors affecting nurses' ethical decision-making and educational planning to improve their decision-making level, it is possible to improve the quality of patients care while improving nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care.

Moral Sensitivity Among Pre-Hospital Emergency Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study
Mostafa Ghasempour, Abbas Dadashzadeh, Majid Purabdollah, Fezeh Hoseini Lilab,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract
Moral sensitivity is a crucial attribute for pre-hospital emergency personnel, significantly impacting their ethical decision-making and patient care in urgent and often complex situations. Defined as the capacity to recognize ethical dilemmas and comprehend their implications, moral sensitivity empowers personnel to navigate challenges such as resource limitations, critical patient conditions, and the imperative for rapid, independent decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the level of moral sensitivity among Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and identify key influencing factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023, encompassing 245 EMTs selected through cluster random sampling. Data were collected using the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) and analyzed employing correlation tests and regression analysis. The findings revealed a mean moral sensitivity score of (39.45 ± 7.13) among participants, indicating a moderate-to-high level of ethical awareness. A significant correlation was observed between moral sensitivity and specific demographic and professional characteristics. Notably, work experience emerged as a key determinant (P < 0.001). Regression analysis further emphasized work experience (β = 0.08, P < 0.001) as a strong predictor, demonstrating that increased exposure to clinical and ethical challenges over time enhances moral sensitivity. Enhancing ethical sensitivity among pre-hospital emergency personnel is paramount to improving their ability to identify and address complex ethical challenges and deliver high-quality patient care. Given the unique demands of emergency situations, including time constraints, resource limitations, and the need for immediate action, it is crucial to equip personnel with the tools necessary to recognize and navigate ethical dilemmas. Implementing comprehensive training programs that emphasize ethical awareness and reasoning can empower EMTs to make more informed and empathetic decisions. Furthermore, cultivating a supportive organizational culture that prioritizes ethical performance and provides ongoing training can further enhance their confidence and competence in managing ethically sensitive situations.

Exploring Advance Directives and End-of-Life Preferences in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Aydin Feyzi, Amirali Soheili, Samira Chaibakhsh, Fidan Shabani, Shiva Khaleghparast,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract
Advance directives (ADs) are legal instruments that enable individuals to express their healthcare preferences in anticipation of a future loss of decision-making capacity. These directives are particularly important in the context of chronic conditions such as heart failure (HF), a disease marked by progressive functional decline and unpredictable medical crises. ADs help safeguard patient autonomy by ensuring that care aligns with personal values and preferences, especially at the end of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to examine the preferences of patients with heart failure regarding life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life decision-making. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering publications up to March 2024. Search terms included "advance directive," "advance care planning," "heart failure," and "end-of-life decision-making." Studies were included if they were original, peer-reviewed, full-text articles focusing on HF patients aged 18 and older. Non-peer-reviewed works and inaccessible full texts were excluded. A total of 25 eligible studies were identified and appraised using the NIH quality assessment tool. Extracted data included demographic characteristics, preferences for treatment, surrogate decision-making, and educational interventions. Findings from the reviewed literature reveal consistently low levels of awareness and completion of ADs among HF patients. Completion rates varied significantly across studies, reflecting potential cultural and systemic influences. Preferences for surrogate decision-makers overwhelmingly favored family members over healthcare professionals. A notable finding from Jawahri et al. (2016) indicated that patients who received video-based education were significantly less inclined to choose cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation compared to those receiving only verbal information. Additional qualitative insights, such as those from Formiga et al. (2004), showed that patients prioritized maintaining dignity, independence, and meaningful relationships over merely extending life. These patterns highlight the necessity of aligning care with patients’ broader goals and values. Across the 25 studies included, a total of 4,091 heart failure patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 68.22 years. Meta-analytic findings demonstrated diverse preferences regarding life-sustaining interventions: approximately 53.73% of patients favored such treatments, while 45.37% declined CPR. These statistics underscore a substantial variability in end-of-life preferences, further reinforcing the need for individualized care planning. In conclusion, patients with heart failure display heterogeneous preferences concerning end-of-life care, shaped by cultural context, personal values, and the type of information provided. Despite the established importance of ADs, significant deficits in awareness, understanding, and documentation persist. These findings point to a critical need for tailored educational interventions, improved provider-patient communication, and culturally sensitive approaches to advance care planning. Future research should focus on designing and integrating standardized AD facilitation tools into routine clinical practice to support truly patient-centered care.

Moral Courage in Intensive Care Nurses: Exploring the Predictors of a Professional Virtue
Ali Akbari, Alireza Arman, Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract
Moral courage is essential for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to navigate complex ethical dilemmas and advocate for patient rights. Despite its importance, the factors that influence the expression of moral courage remain poorly understood. This review aims to identify key predictors of moral courage in ICU nurses, offering valuable insights to enhance ethical decision-making and improve patient care in critical care settings. This review followed the Cochrane systematic review principles and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using both English and Persian keywords related to "moral courage," "ICU nurses," and "predictors." International databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched, along with grey literature from Google Scholar. No time frame restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria included observational studies that focused on predictors of moral courage in ICU nurses, while studies such as clinical trials, reviews, opinion pieces, and those lacking primary data were excluded. Two authors independently screened and extracted data, resolving discrepancies through consensus with a third author. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality, and relevant data were systematically organized into an extraction table. A total of 136 articles were initially identified, with 24 observational studies included after screening. The final selection consisted of 4 cross-sectional studies and 8 cohort studies. Key predictors of moral courage in ICU nurses were identified, including age, gender, professional experience, ethical training, and workplace support. Older and female nurses were more likely to demonstrate moral courage, while nurses with more years of experience and formal ethical training exhibited a stronger ability to confront ethical challenges. Additionally, a supportive work environment and personal ethical beliefs were found to significantly influence the likelihood of nurses advocating for patients and addressing unethical practices. These findings emphasize the importance of both individual and organizational factors in fostering moral courage. This review identifies age, gender, professional experience, ethical training, and workplace support as significant predictors of moral courage in ICU nurses. These findings highlight the critical role of individual characteristics and organizational support in promoting ethical behavior and moral courage in critical care settings.

The Strategy of Nursing Managers in Ethical Decision-Making: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Mostafa Roshanzadeh, Ali Taj, Somayeh Mohammadi,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
In the current health system conditions, the strategies adopted by nursing managers in their ethical decision-making can lead to different results for patients, nurses, and health systems. Therefore, the present study aimed to explain ethical decision-making strategies implemented by nursing managers. The present study was conducted using qualitative content analysis in 2022 at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. A total of 18 nursing managers were selected through purposive sampling and were interviewed using in-depth unstructured individual interviews. Data were analyzed using the method proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. The results revealed one main category (human-centeredness) and three subcategories (customer-centeredness, valuing employees’ dignity, and the conflict between respecting the rights of patients and employees and adhering to organizational policies). Nursing managers attempted to make their ethical decisions based on the principle of humanism by using customer-centeredness strategies, valuing employees’ dignity, and prioritizing the rights of individuals and employees over organizational rules. The results of the present study showed nursing managers make decisions in line with respecting the rights of patients and employees. However, sometimes these decisions conflict with the interests of organizations. In this regard, the existing obstacles that create the conditions for such conflicts should be identified. Increasing organizational commitment in managers can also be effective in decisions that benefit different groups of customers, personnel, and health organizations.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb