Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Voidable

Abbas Yadollahi Baghlooei, Seyed Mohammad Azin, Reza Omani Samani,
Volume 8, Issue 1 (5-2015)
Abstract

Any contract in the Iranian legal system contains features that need to be explained in order to better understand the exact terms of agreement. Some such features are related to whether the contract is irrevocable or voidable, gratuitous or with considerations, and may bear upon accountability and suspension, formality or contentment, and so on. In surrogacy, the sperm and egg of an infertile couple are fertilized and then transferred to another woman's uterus to carry till birth, when the child is delivered to the owners of the sperm and egg. The specific features and uncertain nature of surrogacy specify the standing of this type of contract among others. The present article is aimed to examine the features of surrogacy agreements from ethical and legal perspectives


Mamak Tahmasebi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (12-2024)
Abstract

Avoidable suffering at the end of life refers to the unnecessary pain and distress experienced by individuals with terminal illnesses—pain that can often be alleviated through effective palliative care practices. Addressing this issue is critical for improving the quality of life for both patients and their families during this challenging period. The recognition of holistic care, which considers physical, emotional, spiritual, and social needs, has fueled efforts to enhance end-of-life care to reduce suffering and uphold patients' autonomy. Numerous studies indicate that many terminally ill patients endure avoidable physical and emotional pain as they approach death, highlighting gaps in healthcare delivery. For instance, research from the National Center for Health Statistics reveals that a significant number of hospice patients report unmanaged pain despite the availability of effective interventions. Psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, is also prevalent among terminally ill patients, underscoring the need for comprehensive care that integrates mental health support. Furthermore, neglecting spiritual and social needs can leave patients feeling isolated and despairing, exacerbating their suffering. Ethical considerations in pain management at the end of life remain a subject of debate, particularly concerning the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. The principle of double effect, which permits actions to relieve suffering even if they may unintentionally hasten death, continues to spark controversy among healthcare providers, patients, and families. Additionally, ethical dilemmas arise in advanced care planning, particularly in respecting patient autonomy while navigating complex end-of-life decisions. Addressing avoidable suffering at the end of life requires a multidisciplinary approach that honors patients' values and preferences while striving to minimize unnecessary distress. As research and clinical practices advance, healthcare systems must prioritize strategies to reduce avoidable suffering and ensure patients' dignity during their final days.
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb