Volume 12 - Special Issue Vol.12                   irje 2017, 12 - Special Issue Vol.12: 55-64 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mehrolhassani M, Emami M, Haghdoost A, Dehnavieh R, Amanpour S, Sabbah F et al . Performance Assessment of Medical Universities using Balanced Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process; 2013. irje 2017; 12 :55-64
URL: http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5640-en.html
1- دانشیار مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی درمانی، مرکز تحقیقات انفورماتیک پزشکی، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
2- دانشجوی دکترای تخصصی پژوهشی علوم مدیریت (سیاستگذاری در سلامت)، مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت ارائه خدمات سلامت، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
3- استاد گروه اپیدمیولوژی، مرکز تحقیقات مدلسازی در سلامت، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
4- دانشیار مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی درمانی، مرکز تحقیقات مدلسازی در سلامت، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
5- استادیار پاتولوژی دهان و دندان، دانشکده دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
6- کارشناس ارشد مدیریت دولتی، مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت ارائه خدمات سلامت، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
7- کارشناس ارشد مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی درمانی، مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت ارائه خدمات سلامت، پژوهشکده آینده پژوهی در سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران , mitra.Bazrafshan@gmail.com
Abstract:   (9029 Views)

Background and Objectives: Universities of medical sciences play a vital role in promoting population health and without a doubt, their performance should be measured and evaluated.

Methods: The study was a mixed method study (consecutive combination) and the universities were examined by census. In the qualitative phase of the study, by examining the documents and focused group discussions, the basic framework of the performance evaluation model and its associated challenges were elicited. Then, the policies, objectives, and strategies related to each dimension were extracted and finally, key indicators were selected. Finally, by running Analytic Hierarchy Process method, the weight of dimensions and their key aspects were calculated and the model was implemented.

Results: BSC was designed in accordance with the universities. In this model, four main aspects including population health, services, finance, and development were identified. Then, by reviewing the documents, key policies and strategies, key policies and criteria, primary and secondary strategies were extracted. 13 key indicators were chosen as the final indexes. Moreover, 3 main challenges and 11 secondary challenges were identified. The results of the AHP-BSC model indicated that categorizing (ranking) universities had an impact on their functional status.

Conclusion: The main challenge for evaluating the performance of universities was the presence of a logical connection between policies, strategies, and criteria to have comprehensive and concise indexes for evaluation and ranking.

Full-Text [PDF 1796 kb]   (2658 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/02/22 | Accepted: 2017/02/22 | Published: 2017/02/22

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb