Volume 16, Issue 4 (Vol.16, No.4 2021)
irje 2021, 16(4): 296-304 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khashayar P, Keshtkar A, Ostovar A, Larijani B, Johansson H, Harvey N, et al . Designing an Iran FRAX Model and Defining Intervention and Assessment Thresholds for Osteoporosis. irje 2021; 16 (4) :296-304
URL: http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6865-en.html
URL: http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6865-en.html
P Khashayar1 
, A Keshtkar2 , A Ostovar3 , B Larijani * 4, H Johansson5 , N Harvey6 , M Lorentzon7 , U Mc Closkey8 , J A Kanis9
, A Keshtkar2 , A Ostovar3 , B Larijani * 4, H Johansson5 , N Harvey6 , M Lorentzon7 , U Mc Closkey8 , J A Kanis9
1- Postdoc, Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Center for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, Gent-Zwijnaarde 9052, Belgium
2- Assistant Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Education Development, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor of Epidemiology, Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Professor of Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,larijanib@tums.ac.ir
5- PhD, Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK
6- Professor, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
7- Professor, Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, and Region Västra Götaland, Geriatric Medicine Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Swede
8- Professor, Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK; Centre for Integrated research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
9- Professor, Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK; Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
2- Assistant Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Education Development, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor of Epidemiology, Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Professor of Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
5- PhD, Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK
6- Professor, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
7- Professor, Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, and Region Västra Götaland, Geriatric Medicine Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Swede
8- Professor, Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK; Centre for Integrated research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
9- Professor, Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK; Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
Abstract: (2426 Views)
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to adopt and calibrate the fracture risk assessment algorithm FRAX® for the Iranian population and to provide the required guidance on how to apply it in clinical practice.
Methods: The age-specific ten-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures was calculated in women with an average BMI to determine the fracture probability at two potential intervention thresholds. The first threshold was the age-specific fracture probability associated with a femoral neck T-score of -2.5 SD and the other was age-specific fracture probability in women with a history of fracture without BMD. Current Iranian guidelines were used to define these thresholds. The effect of adding BMD values to the assessment of these thresholds was also evaluated separately.
Results: Similar to women with a previous fracture, the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture increased from 4.9% at the age of 50 years to 17% at the age of 80 years. When using a BMD T-score of ≤−2.5 SD as the intervention threshold, the FRAX probability was twice as high in women aged 50 years as in women of the same age with an average BMD and no risk factor. The FRAX probability increased with age but a T-score of -2.5 SD was actually protective after 80 years or age.
Conclusion: Intervention thresholds based on BMD alone cannot effectively identify high-risk women for fracture, particularly in advanced ages. Using fracture probability based on ‘fracture threshold’ can help to improve the identification of these women.
Methods: The age-specific ten-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures was calculated in women with an average BMI to determine the fracture probability at two potential intervention thresholds. The first threshold was the age-specific fracture probability associated with a femoral neck T-score of -2.5 SD and the other was age-specific fracture probability in women with a history of fracture without BMD. Current Iranian guidelines were used to define these thresholds. The effect of adding BMD values to the assessment of these thresholds was also evaluated separately.
Results: Similar to women with a previous fracture, the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture increased from 4.9% at the age of 50 years to 17% at the age of 80 years. When using a BMD T-score of ≤−2.5 SD as the intervention threshold, the FRAX probability was twice as high in women aged 50 years as in women of the same age with an average BMD and no risk factor. The FRAX probability increased with age but a T-score of -2.5 SD was actually protective after 80 years or age.
Conclusion: Intervention thresholds based on BMD alone cannot effectively identify high-risk women for fracture, particularly in advanced ages. Using fracture probability based on ‘fracture threshold’ can help to improve the identification of these women.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Epidemiology
Received: 2021/05/18 | Accepted: 2021/03/5 | Published: 2021/03/5
Received: 2021/05/18 | Accepted: 2021/03/5 | Published: 2021/03/5
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
