H Soori, A Ansarifar, F Mubasheri, A Mahmoudlou, Z Noorafkan, M Bakhtiari,
Volume 7, Issue 4 (16 2012)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
The relationship between
two things if one is another originator or creator, called causality. Although this
concept is not specified to Medical Sciences and Epidemiology, the importance
of this issue is more highlighted in the field of epidemiology. Causation is
the most basic concepts in empirical sciences and is still under discussion
because it is dependent on the basis of any scientific laws without acceptance
something cease causality is impossible. With the increasing development of
science as well as epidemiology, causality has found a broader concept and its
application in analytical studies and logical interpretation of the results of
this type of study, has a wider dimension. Due to developing new epidemiology
courses at medical universities and increase the number of students, it is felt
to talk more about the causality concept. In this review causality concepts in
the humanities is overviewed, its history is briefly described, the causality
of Medical Epidemiology and also Islamic religion is considered, then the
causality framework, and models to interpret the conventional causality will be
discussed.
B Eshrati, R Emroozi, Es Mousavi, Ms Azimi, A Esmaeeli, H Bakhtiari, Ssh Hosseini, M Ramezani ,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (2-2014)
Abstract
Background & Objectives:: To assess inequity of childhood health care package provision according to the distance of health houses from the town and the provincial capital in Markazi province (Iran).
Methods: We used 4 measures of childhood health care provision by family medicine program in randomly selected health houses in Markazi province. The measures included were monitoring of the childhood health by the GP (General Practitioner), childhood disease management according to the Iranian MOHME guidelines, good knowledge of the GP about the content of the guidelines and good knowledge of the GP about the 1-59 month death registration system. These measures were estimated by a predefined, interviewer administered questionnaire. The distance of each selected health house was determined in each district health center. To assess the inequity of the measures we estimated concentration index and its 95% confidence interval using covariance method. P Values of greater than 0.05 were considered as statistically insignificant.
Results: About 46 health house were randomly selected. All of the estimated concentration indices about the childhood care measures were less than 0.1 and their differences with zero score were insignificant
( p value> 0.05 ).
Conclusion: according to the data of our study it seems there is no inequity between different health houses in accordance of their distance from district center and provincial capital. It seems necessary to measure other health indices to assess the inequity of the whole of the health care providing system.
