E Pourbakhtyaran, Mh Sowlat, A Rashidian, P Pasalar, N Rastkari, M Yunesian,
Volume 8, Issue 4 (9 2013)
Abstract
Background & Objectives: In the last decade, there have been some claims about hazards of Sodium bicarbonate in bread, in public and scientific sites. Currently, the use of sodium bicarbonate in bread processing is forbidden in Iran. Therefore, the present study sought to assess the current evidence on the adverse effects of sodium bicarbonate use from oral route on public health.
Methods: Different databases, including Scopus, Pubmed, and Ovid were searched for hazards of sodium bicarbonate in baking.
Results: Based on this systematic review, there was no study showing any adverse effects of Sodium bicarbonate when used in producing bread. However, we found many studies about the use and medical application of it. The reported adverse effects mostly included gastrointestinal and electrolytes implications at medical doses which are significantly higher than those used in bakery, or some complications due to accidental or excessive oral ingestion of sodium bicarbonate.
Conclusion: Not only was there no evidence on the adverse effects of sodium bicarbonate on public health, but at medical doses, many useful effects were also reported in clinical trial studies. Therefore, it is assumed that the use of Sodium bicarbonate at normal doses does not have any adverse effects on human and can be used for bakery in Iran.
A Rashidian, M Soofi,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (Vol 11, No 1 2015)
Abstract
financial protection against health expenditures is a major goal of health system policymaking. governments have focused on the risk that high health expenditures pose to the financial security of deprived and vulnerable populations. Health systems need to be sure that people receive health services and are protected from the financial burden of health costs. There is no accepted standard for measuring the degree of financial protection. In the literature, there are different approaches to measure the degree of financial protection. Measuring the extent of financial risk is complicated by the fact that the significance of a given risk depends on both the size of the risk and the economic status of the person incurring the risk. Another reason for this complication is that financial risk can also affect the health status. The seriously ill may not receive adequate care if the financial burden on them contributes to a decision not to seek care. Their injury from a lack of risk protection, therefore, may show up as diminished health status and not as a financial loss. The aim of this article is to provide the methodology of the assessment of financial protection against health costs with focus on catastrophic health expenditures. First, we describe and explaine the methodology of measuring the expenditures (based on the WHO approach). Then, we interpret variables used in estimating these costs. Finally, overall discussion and conclusions will be provided in relation to the subject.
V Yazdi Feyzabadi, M Bahrampour, A Rashidian, Aa Haghdoost, M Abolhallaje, B Najafi, Mr Akbari Javar , Mh Mehrolhassani,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (Special Issue Vol.12 2017)
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) is a key indicator for measuring households' financial protection in the health system. This study was conducted to measure the incidence and intensity of CHE in Iranian provinces 2008-2014.
Methods: When the out-of-pocket (OOP) spending of each household amounts to at least 40% of the household's capacity to pay, it is called a catastrophe. The incidence of CHE in Iranian provinces was estimated using the data obtained from household-expenditure-and-income-surveys. The intensity was calculated as the average extent to which OOPs exceeded the 40% threshold. Descriptive statistics and Mann-WhitneyU test were used for data analysis. The index of disparity(ID) was also calculated for geographical disparities across the provinces.
Results: On average, the lowest and highest CHE incidence and intensity were seen in Fars and South Khorasan provinces respectively. However, the highest and lowest rate for CHE households that actually experienced catastrophe at the 40% threshold belonged to Fars and Kurdistan provinces. The incidence of CHE in rural was more than urban areas. ID of CHE incidence for targeted amount was high and had no constant trend.
Conclusion: CHE incidence had a remarkable difference in different provinces and in the rural area compared to the urban area. Due to the importance of this index in promoting health financial protection, like indexes such as OOP, its distribution in rural and urban areas as well as in different provinces is considerable. It requires a structured format to identify the disadvantaged and low-income groups and provide financial-support and insurance for them.
