Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Improvement

M Baniasadi, Mr Aflatoonian, R Rooholamini, B Aflatoonian, R Abbasi,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (6-2014)
Abstract

  Background & Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. Numerous factors are effective in the improvement of patients undergoing surgery in terms of preventing relapse or need for repeated treatment during 6 months after the surgery. This study aimed to determine the factors affecting improvement of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer using a logistic regression model.

  Methods: In this study information of 150 patients were extracted from the surgical records of patients underwent surgery at the Cancer Institute of Tehran Imam Khomeini Hospital. Data were analyzed through SPSS software and using logistic regression models .

  Results: Of 150 studied patients, 18 patients (12%) were not fully recovered while 132 (88%) had complete remission. The mean age of the patients was 43 ± 7.5 years, 92.8% were married, and 87.3% had children. According to the results, the odds of non recovery increased by 1.26 times with each one-year increase in age, 5.3 times with each one lymph node involvement, and 8.67 times in the case of metastasis. Other variables, such as marital status, number of children, tumor size, and location of the metastasis showed no significant relationship.

  Conclusion : The Results showed that age at diagnosis, due to its relationship with metastases and number of involved lymph nodes can be directly or indirectly affect the outcome. Therefore, increasing the women's awareness about breast cancer seems to be necessary for early diagnosis which requires planning a sufficient screening program by health policy makers of the country.


Aa Haghdoost, M Emami, M Hossienpour, F Rakhshani, Mh Mehrolhasani,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2018)
Abstract

Background and Objectives: Promoting health indicators is a key issue in most societies. In this regard, health deputies, through stewardship, monitoring, and coordination, take meassures to promote these indicators. The aim of the present study was to design a model for ranking the performance of the deputies.
 
Methods: This applied qualitative study was conducted in 2012. The research team included 12 health experts who were selected according to management records and long experience in the health deputy. In this study, a review of the literature and documents was done and then, with the focus group discussions and expert opinions, key indicators were defined.
 
Results: a model consisting of 9 process criteria (13 general indicators and 15 specific indicators) was identified for ranking of health deputies. The general processes included leadership and management, programs and strategies, resources and partnerships, manpower, and comprehensive information and statistics system And specific processes included primary health care (PHC), family physician (FP), social determinants of health (SDH) and pilot national plans. The range of indicators scores was between 1-8, which were compared with the zero indicator.
 
Conclusion: The findings showed that the process components and indicators were more effective in determining the status of the health deputies’ performance, and the proposed model is based on the matter. So, it is recommended that the Ministry of Health ranks health deputies every two years to improve process components and criteria of the model based on practical results.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb