Journal of

Background and Aim: Warts are benign tumors caused by different types of human papillomavirus. Different methods are used in the treatment of warts. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness, side effects and number of treatment sessions of CO₂ laser and cryotherapy in the treatment of plantar warts

Methods: Seventy patients (140 feet) with plantar warts on both feet who referred to the dermatology clinic of Farshchian (Sina) Hospital in Hamadan during 2019-2020 were selected by convenience sampling method. The warts were randomly treated with either CO₂ laser or cryotherapy on each foot. After treatment, patients were evaluated every two weeks for up to five sessions for requirement of treatment repetitions and assessment the extent of healing. In the cases with
non-healing lesion, treatment was repeated once every two weeks for up to five sessions. 

Results: The mean age of the patients was 22.11±8.73 years, and 35.7% were male and 64.3% were female. In the CO₂ laser and cryotherapy groups, the frequency of recovery rate was 81.4% and 41.4%, (P<0.001), and the mean number of treatment sessions was 1.90±0.84 and 3.55±0.69 (P<0.001) respectively. Frequency and type of side effects in the CO₂ laser and cryotrapy group was pain 25.7% and 94.3% (P<0.001), itching zero and 32.9% (P<0.001), blisters 2.9% and 82.9% (P<0.001) and hyperpigmentation with zero and 12.9% (P=0.003), respectively.

Conclusion: CO₂ laser is more effective than cryotherapy in less number of sessions and with less side effects for the treatment of plantar warts

Background and Aim: Undesirable appearance of the scar tissue after aesthetic surgery can affect the outcomes and patient satisfaction. In recent years, early laser therapy had been encouraged to reduce the scar tissue formation. However, the available evidence regarding the outcomes of laser therapy utilizing combined lasers are limited. In the current study, the effects of combined laser therapy using pulsed dye laser (PDL) and fractional CO2 laser on the appearance of the scar tissue after aesthetic surgeries were investigated.

Methods: There were 15 patients enrolled in the current study including 13 mammoplasty and 2 abdominoplasty patients. In mammoplasty, each breast was randomly assigned to the laser therapy or control group. In abdominoplasty, split scar design was used. In laser therapy group, at the end of the third postoperative week, PDL 585 nm was radiated. Furthermore, at the end of the sixth week, fractional CO2 laser was radiated. The patients were followed for 6 months after the last laser therapy session. Visual analogue scale was used to rate the appearance of the scar tissues by 3 surgeons blinded to the treatment of scars. The appearance of the scars was determined as poor, fair, good or excellent. 

Results: VAS averaged 5.5±0.8 in laser therapy group and 4.8±0.8 in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant (P=0.057). There was no scar with excellent appearance in the current study. All of the scars were fair and good in the laser therapy group. In the control group, 13 scars were fair. The difference was not significant (P=0.227).

Conclusion: Early combined laser therapy using PDL and fractional CO2 laser was associated with improved appearance of the scar tissue in short-term follow up, however, the effects were not statistically significant.