Mogharrabi S, Ahmadzadeh A, Ghodsi S, Bazmi F, Valizadeh S. Measuring the thickness of buccal cortical bone of maxillary premolar teeth by cone beam computed tomography technique. jdm 2020; 33 (1) :38-45
URL:
http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5983-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Dentist, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4417 Views)
Background and Aims: Immediate implant placement following tooth extraction is a treatment with many advantages. Alveolar bone preservation after immediate implant, need minimum of 2 mm thickness in buccal bone plate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thickness of buccal cortical bone of maxillary premolars by Cone Beam Computational Tomography (CBCT) technique.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive epidemiological study, Cone Beam Computed Tomography image was obtained from 29 patients (male and female) referred to the radiology department of Jundi Shapoor dental school of Ahvaz from 1393 (Mehr) to 1394 (Shahrivar) for implant insertion insertion. The thickness of buccal cortical bone was measured in 3 and 5 mm apical to the CEJ and root apex, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. All the measurements were done by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists, separately. Data were analyzed by SPSS22 software, using descriptive statistics, and T-test.
Results: The thickness of buccal cortical bone in second premolar was significantly more than 1 mm (P=0.001), but in first premolar, the thickness was close to 1 mm with a non-significant difference (P=0.29).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that immediate implant insertion could be done in the maxillary second premolar area with more predictability compared to the first premolar area.
Type of Study:
Research |
Subject:
operative dentistry Received: 2020/08/22 | Accepted: 2020/08/31 | Published: 2020/08/31