Journal of Dental Medicine

Background and Aims: Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) is challenging due to the difficulty of adhesion of dental tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three methods of surface treatments using diamond bur, Er: YAG laser and sandblasting on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to the noncarious dentin in cervical lesions.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 48 canine and premolar extracted human teeth with NCCLs at the buccal surface were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups of twelve each: control group without any treatment, Er: YAG laser group, diamond bur group and sandblasting group. For all groups, the bonding agent used was Clearfil SE Bond and then the cavities were filled with
the Filtek Z250 resin-composite. After this step, the teeth were cut and then subjected to the microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis test.
Results: According to the obtained results, the microtensile bond strength, from the highest to the lowest values were in the sandblast group (24.57±10.24 MPa), the diamond bur group (19.19±10.8 MPa), laser group (18.59±9.05 MPa) and the control group (18.56±9.27 MPa), respectively. Although, no statistically significant difference was found between any of the groups (P=0.266).
Conclusion: It seems that in teeth with NCCLs, the sandblasting method had a much better effect on the bond strength, although no statistically difference between surface treatment methods was found.

Background and Aims: Different factors play a role in causing tooth decay. Modern dentistry is looking for a way to prevent tooth decay and suggests different ways to increase remineralization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nanohydroxyapatite toothpaste and mouthwash on remineralization of primary enamel lesions and obstruction of tubules.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 90 human extracted central teeth were used. Artificial decay was induced by placing the specimens for 72 hrs in a demineralization solution in an incubator at 37 °C. Hardness of the specimens was determined by a microhardness test before any surface treatment. The specimens were then divided randomly into 6 groups of 15. For 1-6 groups, the specimens were subjected to a pH cycling for 14 days, which included 3 hrs of demineralization and 21 hrs of remineralization. At the same time, 1-3 groups were in contact with diluted toothpaste in a ratio of 1:3 with deionized water at a rate of 5 ml twice a day for two min. Eac specimen of 4-6 groups was exposed to 5 ml of three types of mouthwashes for one min. Then, the specimens were cut in the buccolingual direction in order to simultaneously evaluate the dentinal tubules and Vickers microhardness test was performed again and the before and after microhardness values were compared. Then, the percentage of deposition on the surface and tubule obstruction were analyzed using SEM (Scanning electron microscope) (P=0.006). Data were analyzed using SPSS24 software bu the descriptive statistics, ANOVA analysis of variance, and multiple Tukey comparisons.
Results: The results of analysis of variance test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the microhardness changes between study groups (P=0.006). Also, in-group analysis of microhardness changes, there was a significant difference (P<0.0001). Besides, only in the group containing 0.5% nanohydroxyapatite toothpaste, more than 50% tubule deposition and obstraction was observed (P<0.05).
Conclusion: According to the present study, nanohydroxyapatite can be one of the treatment strategies to repair incipient lesions of teeth and the addition of nanohydroxyapatite, preferably to toothpaste, increases the dental microhardness.

Background and Aims: Recently, the addition of nanoparticles into the restorative materials and tooth preparation by laser for improving the bond strength have been concidered by researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of the bioactive glass ionomer containing titanium particles and a conventional glass ionomer with two surface treatments by Er-YAG laser and conventional methods.
Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, 64 sound extracted premolars were collected. For conventional method, the specimens were prepared in such a way that dentin surfaces with a depth of 0.5 millimeter created at distance of 2 mm from the joint of CEJ at the root or crown.  In the laser group, after preparing the teeth, the surface area was prepared by Er-YAG laser. Then, in the middle part of the buccal surface, a cylindrical mold with dimensions of 3.5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height was placed and for each group was filled with its own glass ionomers. The  specimens  were divided into 8 groups by simple random sampling (n=8): A (laser, conventional glass ionomer, coronal dentin)/ B (laser, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle, coronal dentin)/C (conventional, conventional glass ionomer, coronal dentin)/ D (conventional, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle, coronal dentin)/ E (laser, conventional glass ionomer, root dentin)/ F (laser, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle, root dentin)/ G (conventional, conventional glass ionomer, root dentin)/ H (conventional, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle, coronal dentin). Finally, the shear bong strength by a universal testing machine was measured at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. For data analysis, Two-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate the effect of each variable and their interaction on the shear bond strength and Tukey test was used to compare the two groups.
Results: There was significant difference only between groups B with C (P=0.002), E (P=0.007), G (P=0.001) and H (P=0.01). The highest bond strength was found for group B (laser, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle, coronal dentin) and the lowest bond strength for group G (conventional, conventional glass ionomer, root dentin).
Conclusion: All three factors of Er-YAG laser, glass ionomer containing titanium nanoparticle and coronal dentin had a positive effect on the improvement of the bond strength.

Background and Aims: Insufficient adhesion between fiber post and root canal is the main reason for the failure of the restoration and the fiber post surface treatment can imprive the bond strength. Additionally, there is disagreement about the ideal method of preparation to achieve the desired bond. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two surface treatment methods on push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root canals.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 45 healthy incisor teeth underwent root canal treatment. After preparing the post space, they were divided into 3 groups of 15, based on the surface treatment methods of the fiber post. In the first group as control group, no surface treatment was done on the fiber post. In the second and third groups, sandblasting with Cojet sand particles and 810 nm diode laser were used for surface treatment, respectively. Then, fiber posts were placed in all root channels by a self-adhesive resin cement. Then, the roots were cut in such a way that from each, 3 pieces with a thickness of 1.5 mm were obtained. Finally, the push-out bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software. The level of significance was considered at P<0.05.
Results: The average bond strengths in three groups were as follows: control group, 2.877 ±1.430, sandblast group 6.318±3.444, and laser 4.224 ±1.890 MPa ± SD. The difference in the bond strength between the sandblast group and the control group was significant (P=0.001). However, the average of the bond strength of laser group was not significantly different from the control group. (P=0.03).
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that unlike diode laser radiation, the use of Cojet sand particles for sandblasting the fiber post surfaces significanlty improved the bond strength.