Mohammad Mehdi Alishahi, Hemmat Gholinia, Meisam Moradi,
Volume 39, Issue 0 (3-2026)
Abstract
Background and Aims: Despite the functional and aesthetic benefits, orthodontic treatment is often associated with pain and discomfort that can adversely affect patients’ quality of life. Given the growing emphasis on the patient-reported outcomes in clinical care, this study aimed to investigate the association between the pain intensity caused by orthodontic treatment and orthodontic-related quality of life in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022 on patients receiving fixed orthodontic treatment with a metallic MBT system (slot 0.022 inch) at a private clinic in Babol, Iran. A total of 85 patients aged 15–25 years were selected using convenience sampling. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. Quality of life was evaluated using the persian version of the Orthodontic Quality of Life questionnaire, with a scoring range of 22 to 88. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient in SPSS, with a significance level set at P<0.05.
Results: Among the participants, 72.9% were female, 68.2% were under the age of 20, and 31.8% were aged between 20 and 25 years. The mean pain score was 4.75 ± 1.91, and the mean Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) score was 37.95 ± 9.51. A significant negative correlation was found between the pain intensity and overall OHRQoL, as well as all of its subdomains (oral function, social impact, dentofacial aesthetics, and self-awareness of appearance) (P≤0.001). No statistically significant differences in pain or OHRQoL scores were observed based on gender or age group (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Orthodontic pain has a significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life. Early pain management strategies and supportive interventions during the initial phases of orthodontic treatment can enhance patients’ overall treatment experience and improve compliance.
Kosar Gharehkhan, Reza Faraji, Valiollah Arash, Hemmat Gholinia,
Volume 39, Issue 0 (3-2026)
Abstract
Background and Aims: Bolton ratios—the anterior and overall ratios—are important indicators for assessing the dental proportionality between the maxilla and mandible, playing a crucial role in achieving ideal occlusion and successful orthodontic outcomes. Given individual variations in facial growth patterns and their potential influence on these ratios, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Bolton ratios and vertical skeletal patterns in the population from northern Iran, as well as to investigate the effect of gender on these ratios.
Materials and Methods: In this observational-analytical study, 173 Class I orthodontic patients
(121 females and 52 males) with a mean age of 16.02 ± 4.51 years were evaluated. Based on the vertical facial pattern using the Jarabak index, the subjects were categorized into three groups: short face (n=52), normal face (n=67), and long face (n=54). The anterior and overall Bolton ratios, and overbite were measured from dental casts. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, ANOVA, t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient in SPSS ver. 26, with a significance level set at 0.05.
Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the anterior and overall Bolton ratios among the three vertical facial groups (P=0.062 and P=0.36, respectively) or between genders (P=0.53 and P=0.42, respectively). In contrast, the mean overbite significantly differed among the groups (P<0.001). Comparison of the anterior (79.16 ± 3.88%) and overall (90.09 ± 6.89%) Bolton ratios with the original Bolton standards revealed statistically significant differences (P=0.001 and P=0.02, respectively).
Conclusion: According to the findings, neither the vertical skeletal pattern nor gender had a significant effect on Bolton ratios. Nevertheless, the observed differences between the ratios in this northern Iranian population and the original Bolton standards underscore the importance of using population-specific norms in orthodontic treatment planning.
Marjan Mohsenpour, Sara Arianian, Reza Ghorbanipour, Sedigheh Sheykhzadeh, Valiolah Arash, Hemmat Gholinia Ahangar,
Volume 39, Issue 0 (3-2026)
Abstract
Background and Aims: Post-treatment relapse is one of the common challenges in maintaining orthodontic results, and the selection of the type and characteristics of retainers plays a crucial role in treatment stability. Vacuum-formed retainers (Essix) are widely used due to their ease of fabrication, esthetics, and high patient acceptance. However, the effect of different thicknesses of these retainers on the preservation of occlusal characteristics has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Essix retainer thickness on maintaining occlusal characteristics.
Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 2025 on 30 patients (23 females and 7 males) who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups receiving Essix retainers of different thicknesses (1.5 mm and 1 mm) under similar retention protocols. The variables of overjet, overbite, inter-canine width, inter-molar width, upper arch length, and the dental irregularity index were measured immediately after debonding at 6 and 9 months of the retention phase. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, and comparisons were made between the two groups.
Results: The results demonstrated that the use of 1.5 mm thickness of Essix retainers led to a significant increase in overjet over time (p=0.04), whereas the 1 mm thickness showed no significant change (p=0.22). Changes in overbite were not significant in either group (p=0.60) and the difference between the two groups at 9 months was also not significant (p=0.23). Inter-canine width (p=0.38) and inter-molar width (p=0.13) did not change significantly over time and the difference between groups at 9 months was not significant (p>0.05). Regarding the arch length, the 1.5 mm thickness showed significant changes (p=0.04), whereas the 1 mm thickness did not (p=0.16). However, the difference between groups at 9 months was not significant (p=0.44). The dental irregularity index decreased significantly in both groups (p≤0.001), but the degree of change between groups was not significant (p=0.35).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, clinically, the thinner Essix retainers did not result in greater relapse compared to the thicker Essix retainers. Therefore, the selection of Essix retainer thickness can be based on the patient preference and clinician judgment, without a need to recommend a specific thickness definitively. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods are suggested to evaluate the long-term stability of treatment outcomes.
