Journal of Dental Medicine

Background and Aims: In the field of orthodontics, gaining comprehensive information around dento-skeletal complex is necessary to choose the best treatment plan for each patient. The aim of this study was to investigate the linear and angular parameters in panoramic radiographs to find a path to correlate transvers to sagittal dimensions.

Materials and Methods: Total number of sixty two, 8-14 years old children who sought for orthodontic therapy were selected (32 skeletal Class III and 30 skeletal Class I). They were exposed to x-ray to obtain the panoramic and lateral views in a controlled condition. Various linear and angular parameters were measured after tracing the landmarks on the panoramic radiograph. Data were obtained and analyzed using T-test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (P<0.05).

Results: Linear parameters of Co-Co, Go-Go and PTM-PTM were significantly lower in class III patients than class I ones (P=0.04, 0.04, 0.02, respectively). The ramus width value was also lower in class III patients. Angular parameters of  Me^˄ and N^˄ also showed the same results (P<0.001). Go^˄ angle was significantly lower in the class I than class III patients (P=0.002, 0.007).

Conclusion: Some traceable linear and angular parameters were found in the panoramic radiographs which had the potential to correlate the transverse with sagittal dimension.

Background and Aims: Considering the extensive connections of anatomical components in the head and neck region, it is expected that a change in one of the components of this functional unit will have effects on other parts. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of correction of class III skeletal relationship with orthognathic surgery on the angles between cervical vertebrae.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical retrospective study was conducted in 1403 at the orthodontic department of Babol Dental School. 30 patients with class III skeletal malformations in the age group of 18 to 48 years who underwent orthognathic surgery (single jaw or double jaw) and had a good quality lateral cephalometric radiography were randomly selected and available based on entry and exit criteria. Dependent variables including 13 parameters in the cranial (angles of SNA, SNB, ANB and Wits App), cervical (the angle between the OPT and CVT lines with each other and with the true perpendicular line) and craniocervical area (the angle of the OPT and CVT lines with the horizontal planes of the head, including the mandibular and palatal plane) of the head and neck were used to evaluate the angles between the cervical vertebrae. The data were analyzed using SPSS22 software and independent t-test, and in case of non-normality, Will-Coxon test was used.
Results: In this study, a total of 30 samples were examined. None of the measured parameters of the cervical area before and after surgery showed a statistically significant change (P<0.05). By comparing the angles between the cervical vertebrae, the PP/CVT angle in the craniocervical region showed statistically significant changes (P=0.024). The values of PP/OPT, MP/OPT, SN/CVT, and MP/CVT angles increased slightly after surgery, but they were not statistically significant (P≥0.05), which showed a relative increase in the tension of the head on the upper part of the cervical spine.
Conclusion: Changing the position of the jaw following orthognathic surgery could cause head extension, but it had no effect on the position of the first 4 cervical vertebrae.