Journal of Dental Medicine

Background and Aim: Intrabony periodontal defects are important problems in periodontology and up to now several ways have been suggested for their treatment .Treatment with enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) has been shown to enhance periodontal regeneration. There is limited information available from clinical trials regarding the performance of EMD in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic effects of EMD treatment to that of open flap debridment (OFD) for two and three walled intrabony defects.

Materials and Methods: 18 patients were included in this clinical trial which have 24 two and/ or three intrabony defects. Defects were randomly divided into two groups (test and control). Defects in test group were treated with flap surgery plus EMD and in control group with open flap debridment. At baseline and at 3 and 6 months follow up, clinical and radiographic measurements were performed. Data were analyzed using Greenhouse-Geisser test with p<0.05 as the limit of significance.

Results: At 3 and 6 months, mean probing pocket depth reduction was greater in the test group (EMD) (4.33 mm and 4.70 mm) compared to the OFD group (2.54 mm and 3.09 mm). Mean values for clinical attachment gain in the EMD group after 3 and 6 months were 4.29 mm and 4.98 mm, and in OFD group were 2.83 and 2.82 mm respectively. Radiographic bone gain measured by radiovisiography technique was greater in the EMD group compared to the OFD group (4.66 mm in EMD and 1.11 mm in OFD group after 3 months and 5.78 mm in EMD and 1.39 mm in OFD group after 6 months).

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, treatment with flap surgery and EMD compared to open flap debridment, produced more favorable clinical improvements in two and three walled intrabony defects.

Background and Aim: Improving esthetics is a major goal in periodontal treatments and specially reconstruction of dental papilla is of great importance. Different techniques have been developed, however the results are not completely predictable. The aim of the present study was to compare the possibility of papilla reconstruction using connective tissue graft with and without Emdogain.

Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, 40 class II lost interdental papilla (Nordland- Tarnow classification) in 18 patients (4 male and 14 female) were studied. Samples were randomly devided into two groups. Case group was treated by connective tissue graft and emdogain (Straumann-USA) and controls were treated using connective tissue graft only. Periodontal parameters including papilla height (PH), periodontal pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured before surgery, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. At the tenth days and 1 month after treatment only the papilla height was measured. Repeated measures analysis was used for data analysis with p<0.05 as the level of significance.

Results: In the control group the mean papilla height changed from 3.38 0.89 to 2.85 0.93 on the 3rd month and 2.90 0.95 on the 6th month. The mean PPD changed from 2.8  0.68 to 2.55 0.70 on the 3rd month and 3.06 1.25 on the 6th month. The mean CAL changed from 3.88 1.29 to 3.79 1.25 on the 3rd month and 4.11 1.44 on the 6th month. In test group the mean papilla height changed from 2.98 0.91 to 2.45 1.55 on the 3rd month and 2.55 1.48 on the 6th month. The mean PPD changed from 2.75 1.49 to 2.63 1.38 on the 3rd month and 2.88 1.39 on the 6th month. The mean CAL changed from 3.75 1.24 to 4.01 1.45 on the 3rd month and 4.28 1.63 on the 6th month. These differences were not significant between the studied groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, use of connective tissue with or without emdogain is not effective in interdental papilla reconstruction.