Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Microtensile Bond Strength

Abdolrahim Davari, Alireza Danesh Kazemi, Majid Mousvinasab, Ali Nadaf,
Volume 24, Issue 4 (1-2012)
Abstract

Background and Aims: Composite restorative materials and dental adhesives are usually cured with light sources. The light direction may influence the bond strength of dental adhesives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of light direction on the microtensile bond strength of fifth and sixth generation dental adhesives.

Materials and Methods: Prime & Bond NT and Clearfil SE bond were used with different light directions. Sixty human incisor teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=15). In groups A and C, Clearfil SE bond with light curing direction from buccal was used for bonding a composite resin to dentin. In groups B and D, Prime & Bond NT with light curing direction from composite was used. After thermocycling the specimens were subjected to tensile force until debonding occurred and values for microtensile bond strength were recorded. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.

Results: The findings showed that the bond strength of Clearfil SE bond was significantly higher than that of Prime&Bond NT (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between light curing directions (P=0.132).

Conclusion: Light curing direction did not have significant effect on the bond strength. Sixth generation adhesives was more successful than fifth generation in terms of bond strength to dentin.


Abdolrahim Davari, Alireza Daneshkazemi, Farnaz Frahat, Fatemeh Kohestani,
Volume 32, Issue 1 (7-2019)
Abstract

Background and Aims: Despite patient’s demand increased for tooth color restorations, the stable bond between dentin and composite is a challenge in dentistry. Dentin protease activation is responsible for dentin-resin bond failure. The aim of this study was to determine the best pretreatment agent to inhibit matrix metalloproteinase and increase resin-dentin bond durability.
Materials and Methods: After collecting 24 intact third molars, the dentin surfaces were exposed immediately under DEJ. After acid etching of dentin rewetting was done with CHX 2%, EDC 0.3 M for 60 and water (control group). Then the adhesive (Single bond, 3M ESPE, USA) and composite (Filtek Z250 XT, 3M ESPE, USA) were applied. 48 sectioned dentinal specimens were prepared. The specimens were divided into 3 groups. Each group was divided into 2 sub groups (n=8). In half of each group, the micro tensile bond strength test was done immediately and another part half 6 months. Then, the specimens were evaluated by stereomicroscope and SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS23 software, two-way ANOVA and multiple Tukey and T-test comparisons. P<0.05 was considered as a significant level.
Results: There were not significant differences between immediate micro tensile bond strength of CHX, EDC and control groups (P=0.97). However, there was significant differences between CHX, EDC compared with the control group (P≤0.0001). Comparison between the immediate and 6-month bond strengths in each group, only in EDC group, there was no significant after 6 months’ difference (P=0.64).
Conclusion: EDC and CHX t did not have any effect on the immediate microtensile bond strength. After 6 months, EDC prevented bond strength deterioration, but the bond strength was decreased after CHX usage.

Abdolrahim Davari, Farnaz Farahat, Sanaz Abbasi,
Volume 34, Issue 0 (5-2021)
Abstract

Background and Aims: Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) is challenging due to the difficulty of adhesion of dental tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three methods of surface treatments using diamond bur, Er: YAG laser and sandblasting on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to the noncarious dentin in cervical lesions.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 48 canine and premolar extracted human teeth with NCCLs at the buccal surface were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups of twelve each: control group without any treatment, Er: YAG laser group, diamond bur group and sandblasting group. For all groups, the bonding agent used was Clearfil SE Bond and then the cavities were filled with
the Filtek Z250 resin-composite. After this step, the teeth were cut and then subjected to the microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis test.
Results: According to the obtained results, the microtensile bond strength, from the highest to the lowest values were in the sandblast group (24.57±10.24 MPa), the diamond bur group (19.19±10.8 MPa), laser group (18.59±9.05 MPa) and the control group (18.56±9.27 MPa), respectively. Although, no statistically significant difference was found between any of the groups (P=0.266).
Conclusion: It seems that in teeth with NCCLs, the sandblasting method had a much better effect on the bond strength, although no statistically difference between surface treatment methods was found.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb