Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Obturation
Comparison of the apical leakage of root canals filled with MTA with those filled with gutta percha and lateral condensation technique
M. Tabrizizadeh , Z. Mohammadi , Mj. Barzegar Bafruyi ,
Volume 20, Issue 4 (1-2008)
Abstract

Background and Aim: Sealing the root canal system is of great importance in endodontic treatment especially in infected teeth. Several materials have been introduced for this purpose. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sealing ability of MTA as an orthograde root filling material and compare it with laterally condensed gutta-percha with sealer.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted human maxillary central and canine teeth were used in this experimental study. After preparation and surface disinfection with 1% NaOCl solution, the crowns of the teeth were cut at cemento-enamel junction.Roots were randomly divided into four groups: two experimental groups  of 15 roots each (gutta-percha with AH26 sealer and MTA) and two control groups of 3 roots each (positive and negative). After root canal preparation and filling, the sealing ability of each technique was assessed by immersion in 1% methylene blue dye for 72 hours. Then the teeth were cleared and the extent of dye penetration was measured with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by T-test with P<0.05 as the level of significance.

Results: The results showed that the mean microleakage was 1.1mm (SD=2.1) in the gutta percha group and 3.4mm (SD= 2.1) in the MTA group.This difference was statistically significant (P=0.013).

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, canal obturation with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer may provide a better apical seal compared with MTA. However, further studies on microbial leakage are needed for more precise evaluation of the sealing ability of MTA.


Maxillary first molar with two palatal roots: a case report
M. Salapoor, N. Farhad Mollashahi,
Volume 23, Issue 3 (12-2010)
Abstract

 The goal of each root canal therapy is cleaning and obturating the entire root canal system. A thorough knowledge of root and root canal morphology and a good anticipation of their possible morphologic variations are essential and will help to reduce endodontic failure caused by incomplete root canal preparation and obturation. In this study, one case of maxillary molar with two palatal roots has been reported in a a 40-year-old woman is reported..


Evaluation of gutta-percha adaptation in curved canals prepared with M3 and Neoniti files by CBCT
Robab Farhang, Mehrnoosh Kaviani, Maedeh Aminian, Aziz Kamran, Mahdi Fathi, Zahra Heidarpour,
Volume 38, Issue 0 (4-2025)
Abstract
Background and Aims: The foundations of a successful root canal treatment are adequate adaptation of the gutta-percha to the canal wall and the establishment of an impermeable apical seal. Despite the common use of M3 and Neoniti rotary files by dentists, no study has been conducted to examine the compliance of gutta-percha in curved canals prepared with M3 and Neoniti files using CBCT. The present study was designed and compiled with the aim of investigating the adaptation of gutta-percha in curved canals prepared with M3 and Neoniti files by CBCT.
Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled laboratory study was conducted ex vivo on 30 permanent human first molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups (the first group with M3 and the second group with neoniti), after finding and fixing the appropriate canal path with the examined rotary files. All groups were filled with Single Cone method using F2 gutta-percha and AH26 sealer. Then, the gutta adaptation was assessed using clinical criteria (visual and radiographic) and after the specimens were evaluated using CBCT. All the images obtained from CBCT were converted into the JPEG format and then entered into image J software. The gap between the canal walls and gutta was measured in each canal, and the obtained data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Results: The results showed that the average and standard deviation of gap in M3 files (0.181 ± 0.089) was higher than that of Neoniti file (0.173 ± 0.033). However, no significant difference in the gutta-percha adaptation in curved canals prepared between the M3 and Neoniti files  was observed (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Considering the acceptable adaptation of gutta-percha in canals prepared with M3 and Neoniti files, the use of these two files is recommended in curved canals.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb