Journal of Dental Medicine

---

Background and Aim: Formocresol (FC) has been a popular pulpotomy medicament for primary dentition in recent decades. Concerns have been raised about the toxicity and potential carcinogenicity of FC, and alternatives have been proposed. Recently, the physical and biological properties of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) have been described in many studies. The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of pulpotomy with MTA (made in Iran) and FC in primary molars.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, 30 primary molars needing pulpotomy treatment were selected and randomly divided into two groups: (15 teeth in FC and 15 in MTA group). The teeth were then pulpotomized and restored. Clinical and radiographic results were recorded at 1-3-6-9 and 12 months and success rates of two groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test with p<0.05 as the level of significance.
Results: After 12 months, there was no statistical significant difference between MTA group (85.8%) and FC group (93.3%) (P 1.0). The only observed radiographic failure was internal resorption.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, MTA can be used as an alternative to formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomy.

---

Background and Aim: The role of applying rotary instruments in reducing preparation time and proper root canal preparation have been approved in permanent teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the rotary instruments (Hero642) and K-files in root canal preparation of primary molars. Time and canal transportation were compared.

Materials and Methods: In this experimental, invitro study, 30 human extracted primary molars with 8 mm length were selected and divided into two equal groups. After preparing access cavity, group 1was prepared by K-files and group 2 by Hero642 systems. Before canal preparation, with # 15 K-file and after canal preparation, with master apical file, canal curvature was evaluated by Weine technique using Radiovisiography. Apical transportation was calculated. Time taken for preparation was recorded by chronometer. The results were analyzed with T-test and Mann-Whitney. P<0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Results: The average canal transportation angle was 3.42 for Hero642 group and 7.33 for K-file group (p<0.04). The mean instrumentation time was 4.28 for Hero642 group and 8.76 minutes for K-file group (p<0.001). There was a significant difference between two groups.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested to apply Hero642 rotary instrument for primary molar canal preparation due to less preparation time and less canal transposition.