Volume 23, Issue 2 (8-2024)
jhosp 2024, 23(2): 141-170 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Heydari Baghdad Abadi S M M, Maetoofi A, Farhadi Mahali A, Tabari M. Presentation of The Evaluation Model of Hospital Accreditation Policy: Expanding The Process of Paradigmatic Phenomenology. jhosp 2024; 23 (2) :141-170
URL: http://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6689-en.html
URL: http://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6689-en.html
Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi Heydari Baghdad Abadi1 
, Alireza Maetoofi * 2, Ali Farhadi Mahali3 , Mojtaba Tabari4
, Alireza Maetoofi * 2, Ali Farhadi Mahali3 , Mojtaba Tabari4
1- PhD Student in Public Administration, Majoring in Decision-Making and Public Policy, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. *Corresponding Author Email: Alirezamaetoofi@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. *Corresponding Author Email: Alirezamaetoofi@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran.
Abstract: (44 Views)
Background and purpose: Hospitals play a critical role in promoting public health and well-being in social contexts. This necessitates codified standards aimed at maintaining treatment quality and enhancing social satisfaction. Hospital accreditation policy evaluation is considered a systematic process that can have significant social and functional implications for hospitals. This study aims to present an evaluation model of hospital accreditation policy based on the process of paradigmatic phenomenology.
Methods: Using Husserl's (1970) phenomenological approach, this study developed a paradigmatic evaluation model in five analytical steps. First, through interviews with experts and open coding, propositional themes related to the phenomenon under study were identified. A focus group was then formed to discuss and analyze these propositions. Each proposition was scored using the Q-method checklist, with scores ranging from +6 to -6, to identify paradigmatic clusters.
Results: During the qualitative analysis, 16 interviews resulted in 138 open codes. After eliminating redundancies and overlapping codes, 50 propositional themes were finalized. These themes were organized into conceptual clusters within the framework of paradigmatic phenomenology, following Husserl's methodological steps.
Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the formation of a hospital accreditation policy evaluation model structured around causal, intervening, contextual conditions, strategies, and outcomes. This model has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare service delivery and improve the overall quality of treatment in society.
Methods: Using Husserl's (1970) phenomenological approach, this study developed a paradigmatic evaluation model in five analytical steps. First, through interviews with experts and open coding, propositional themes related to the phenomenon under study were identified. A focus group was then formed to discuss and analyze these propositions. Each proposition was scored using the Q-method checklist, with scores ranging from +6 to -6, to identify paradigmatic clusters.
Results: During the qualitative analysis, 16 interviews resulted in 138 open codes. After eliminating redundancies and overlapping codes, 50 propositional themes were finalized. These themes were organized into conceptual clusters within the framework of paradigmatic phenomenology, following Husserl's methodological steps.
Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the formation of a hospital accreditation policy evaluation model structured around causal, intervening, contextual conditions, strategies, and outcomes. This model has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare service delivery and improve the overall quality of treatment in society.
Keywords: Hospital Accreditation, Policy Evaluation, Paradigmatic Phenomenology, Q-Scale, Healthcare Quality
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
سیاست گذاری ، برنامه ریزی و رهبری و مدیریت در بیمارستان
Received: 2024/08/16 | Accepted: 2024/12/29 | Published: 2025/02/11
Received: 2024/08/16 | Accepted: 2024/12/29 | Published: 2025/02/11
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
